John proposes that the number has the following rules:
1) If it is multiplied by a positive integer n, then the product uses the digits 0 to 9 only once.
2) If n is a multiple of 3 , then Rule 1 does not apply . Otherwise, Rule 1 applies.
3)The product has at least 10 digits. Any product that has less than 10 digits will have 0s added to the front until it reaches 10 digits.
Because he's a jerk, you want to prove him wrong. So, you search for a counterexample to his proposal. You are finding the smallest possible integer that disproves his proposal.
Does such a integer exist? If it does, what is it? If it doesn't, answer 0.
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
No explanations have been posted yet. Check back later!