1 + r 1 + r 2 1 + r 3 1 + r 4 1 + ⋯ = 1 − s 1 + s 2 1 − s 3 1 + s 4 1 + ⋯
What is the relationship between r and s ?
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
I'm glad to see such sensible solutions. I was afraid someone would say compare the second term to get r 1 = − s 1 , but just that condition isn't sufficient.
Let s = − x . The alternating sum becomes the sum of all inverse powers of x , with no alternating signs; compare it with the series for r , and you can match every power of x with every power of r ; thus, r = x , which means r = − s , or r + s = 0 .
The common ratio for the L.H.S of the equation is r 1 ÷ 1 = r 1 , while that of the R.H.S of the equation is s − 1 ÷ 1 = s − 1 .
So, sum of the geometric infinite series in L.H.S of the equation= 1 − r 1 1 = r − 1 r .
And the sum of the series in the R.H.S= ( 1 + s 1 ) 1 = s + 1 s .
So, L . H . S = R . H . S
⇒ r − 1 r = s + 1 s
⇒ r s + r = r s − s
⇒ r + s = 0
The other answers are great, but I'll leave my two cents here as well.
1 + r 1 + r 2 1 + r 3 1 + … = 1 − s 1 + s 2 1 − s 3 1 + …
We can try to write the progression using sigma notation:
k
=
1
∑
∞
r
−
k
=
k
=
1
∑
∞
−
s
−
k
Then we use the formula for the sum of infinite geometric series:
1
−
r
−
k
1
=
1
+
s
−
k
1
Simplify a bit:
1
−
r
−
k
=
1
+
s
−
k
−
r
−
k
=
s
−
k
Transform it into logs:
lo
g
−
r
s
−
k
=
−
k
Use some log properties to simplify it even further:
−
k
⋅
lo
g
−
r
s
=
−
k
lo
g
−
r
s
=
1
−
r
=
s
And now we arrive at the answer:
r
+
s
=
0
Note that the parts after "Then we use the formula for the sum of infinite geometric series: " are incorrect. You will notice that there is no k in the original problem, so you should question how you arrived at 1 − r − k 1 = 1 + s − k 1 .
As a response to the Challenge's Master note:
I used
k
with sigma notation to show both infinite series, and then after that I used the formula for the sum of infinite series
1
−
r
a
, where
∣
r
∣
<
1
.
I don't see where's the error.
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Relevant wiki: Geometric Progression Sum
1 + r 1 + r 2 1 + r 3 1 + r 4 1 + … = 1 − s 1 + s 2 1 − s 3 1 + s 4 1 − …
Notice that the LHS is the sum of a geometric progression to infinity, where a = 1 and r = r 1
Similarly, notice that the RHS is also the sum of another geometric progression to infinity, where a = 1 and r = − s 1
Therefore, we can replace these two sides of the equation with the formula for sums of GP to infinity:
1 − r 1 1 = 1 − ( − s 1 ) 1 r r − 1 1 = s s + 1 1 r − 1 r = s + 1 s r ( s + 1 ) = s ( r − 1 ) r s + r = r s − s r + s = 0