This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Simple standard approach.
Amazing @Abdur Rehman Zahid
Ramanujan's nested radical formula (equation 21) is as follows:
x + n + a = a x + ( n + a ) 2 + x a ( x + n ) + ( n + a ) 2 + ( x + n ) a ( x + 2 n ) + ( n + a ) 2 + ( x + 2 n ) . . .
Substitute x = 2 0 1 6 , n = 1 and a = 0 , we have:
2 0 1 6 + 1 + 0 = 1 + 2 0 1 6 1 + 2 0 1 7 1 + 2 0 1 8 1 + 2 0 1 9 1 + . . .
Therefore, S = 2 0 1 7
Ramanujan told us that: 3 = 1 + 2 1 + 3 . . . . Through manipulation, it is easy to see that: y = 1 + x 1 + ( x + 1 ) . . . , where y = x + 1 . So then x = 1 + 2 0 1 6 1 + 2 0 1 7 . . . x = 2 0 1 7
More of a hint than solution, refer Ramanujan's infinite nested radicals.
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Let's start by forming a nested radical expession for ∣ x ∣ : ∣ x ∣ = x 2 ∣ x ∣ = 1 + ( x − 1 ) 1 + x ( x + 2 ) ∣ x ∣ = 1 + ( x − 1 ) 1 + x 1 + ( x + 1 ) ( x + 3 ) ⋮ ∣ x ∣ = 1 + ( x − 1 ) 1 + x 1 + ( x + 1 ) 1 + ( x + 2 ) ⋯ Simply putting x = 2 0 1 7 gives us: 2 0 1 7 = 1 + 2 0 1 6 1 + 2 0 1 7 1 + 2 0 1 8 1 + 2 0 1 9 ⋯