A calculus problem by Kushal Bose

Calculus Level 5

Evaluate:

0 ( ln x ) 2 e x d x = γ a + π b c \large \displaystyle \int_{0}^{\infty} \dfrac{(\ln x)^2}{e^x} \, dx = \gamma^a + \dfrac{\pi^b}{c}

If a , b , c a,b,c are positive integers then submit your answer as a + b + c a+b+c


The answer is 10.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

1 solution

Mark Hennings
Jun 9, 2017

We have 0 ( ln x ) 2 e x d x = d 2 d α 2 0 e x x α 1 d x α = 1 = Γ ( 1 ) = Γ ( 1 ) [ ψ ( 1 ) 2 + ψ ( 1 ) ] = ψ ( 1 ) 2 + ψ ( 1 ) = γ 2 + 1 6 π 2 \begin{aligned} \int_0^\infty \frac{(\ln x)^2}{e^x}\,dx & = \left.\frac{d^2}{d\alpha^2}\int_0^\infty e^{-x} x^{\alpha-1}\,dx \right|_{\alpha = 1} \\ & = \Gamma''(1) \; = \; \Gamma(1)\big[\psi(1)^2 + \psi'(1)\big] \; = \; \psi(1)^2 + \psi'(1) \\ & = \gamma^2 + \tfrac16\pi^2 \end{aligned} making the answer 2 + 2 + 6 = 10 2+2+6 = \boxed{10} .

Wow, this solution looks beast. It looks to me as if you multiplied the integrand by x^(alpha - 1) and differentiated twice w.r.t. alpha to get rid of the (ln(x)^2. But then shouldn't you have a double integral w.r.t. alpha and not a double derivative? Is there something I'm not getting here?

James Wilson - 3 years, 9 months ago

Log in to reply

No. If you start with x α 1 = e α ln x x x^{\alpha-1} = \frac{e^{\alpha \ln x}}{x} and differentiate it twice with respect to α \alpha , you obtain ( ln x ) 2 e α ln x x = ( ln x ) 2 x α 1 \frac{(\ln x)^2e^{\alpha \ln x}}{x} = (\ln x)^2 x^{\alpha-1} . Thus d 2 d α 2 0 e x x α 1 d x = 0 d 2 d α 2 e x x α 1 d x = 0 e x ( ln x ) 2 x α 1 d x \frac{d^2}{d\alpha^2}\int_0^\infty e^{-x}x^{\alpha-1}\,dx \; = \; \int_0^\infty \frac{d^2}{d\alpha^2}e^{-x}x^{\alpha-1}\,dx \; = \; \int_0^\infty e^{-x} (\ln x)^2 x^{\alpha-1}\,dx using the necessary theorems to let us bring the double differentiation through the integral sign. Then put α = 1 \alpha = 1 .

Mark Hennings - 3 years, 9 months ago

Log in to reply

I figured out where I was mistaken earlier. I wanted to post again but I couldn't find this problem for some reason. Thanks for clarifying anyway. I love seeing your solutions. They are always genius.

James Wilson - 3 years, 9 months ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...