Define . Find the sum of all of the values of 'n' that makes g(x) differentiable over the real numbers.
)
(This was the last question in the CSAT Mathematics Type B from this year)
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
m is a natural number.
.
Let n = 2 m .
And let's divide ∑ k = 1 n ∣ ∣ f ( x k ) ∣ ∣ into two parts.
Like ∑ k = 1 m ∣ ∣ f ( x 2 k − 1 ) ∣ ∣ and ∑ k = 1 m ∣ ∣ f ( x 2 k ) ∣ ∣ .
Then let's take a closer look at ∑ k = 1 m ∣ ∣ f ( x 2 k ) ∣ ∣ . What's the minimum of f ( x 2 k ) ?
According to the question, f ( x 2 k ) = e x 2 k + 1 − 1 . And the smallest x 2 k + 1 can get is when x = 0 , since x 2 k = ( x 2 ) k and x 2 is always greater than or equal to 0 .
So naturally the minimum of f ( x 2 k ) is e − 1 , which is positive.
Then we can conclude that no matter the value of x , f ( x 2 k ) > 0 , and the function ∣ ∣ f ( x 2 k ) ∣ ∣ is always differentiable, so we can eliminate that from our calculation.
.
Now let n = 2 m − 1 .
And let's divide ∑ k = 1 n ∣ ∣ f ( x k ) ∣ ∣ into two parts.
Like ∑ k = 1 m ∣ ∣ f ( x 2 k − 1 ) ∣ ∣ and ∑ k = 1 m ∣ ∣ f ( x 2 k − 2 ) ∣ ∣ .
Then let's take a closer look at ∑ k = 1 m − 1 ∣ ∣ f ( x 2 k ) ∣ ∣ . What's the minimum of f ( x 2 k ) ?
Wait, this is the same thing as before. I'll gladly skip doing the whole thing again.
.
So whether n = 2 m − 1 or n = 2 m , you only get ∑ k = 1 m ∣ ∣ f ( x 2 k − 1 ) ∣ ∣ as influenceable over the differentiability of g ( x ) .
Then let's define p ( x ) = 1 0 0 ∣ f ( x ) ∣ − ∑ k = 1 m ∣ ∣ f ( x 2 m − 1 ) ∣ ∣ .
Hmm. In order for g(x) to be differentiable, lim h → + 0 h p ( x + h ) − p ( x ) = lim h → + 0 − h p ( x − h ) − p ( x ) has to be satisfied.
.
According to the question, f ( x 2 k − 1 ) = e x 2 k − 1 + 1 − 1 .
If x ≥ − 1 , you can see that x 2 k − 1 ≥ − 1 , which means x 2 k − 1 + 1 ≥ 0 . Therefore e x 2 k − 1 + 1 ≥ 1 and finally e x 2 k − 1 + 1 − 1 ≥ 0 . f ( x 2 k − 1 ) ≥ 0 .
Use a similar method to x < − 1 , and you get f ( x 2 k − 1 ) < 0 .
Substitute k = 1 .
If x ≥ − 1 , f ( x ) ≥ 0 , and if x < − 1 , f ( x ) < 0 .
.
So we can say that,
If x ≥ − 1 , p ( x ) = 1 0 0 f ( x ) − ∑ k = 1 m f ( x 2 k − 1 ) .
And if x < − 1 , p ( x ) = − 1 0 0 f ( x ) + ∑ k = 1 m f ( x 2 k − 1 )
.
lim h → + 0 h p ( − 1 + h ) − p ( − 1 ) = lim h → + 0 ( 1 0 0 × h f ( − 1 + h ) − f ( − 1 ) − h ∑ k = 1 m ( f ( ( − 1 + h ) 2 k − 1 ) − f ( ( − 1 ) 2 k − 1 ) ) )
= lim h → + 0 ⎝ ⎛ 1 0 0 × h e h − 1 − h ∑ k = 1 m ( e ( h − 1 ) 2 k − 1 + 1 − 1 ) ⎠ ⎞ = lim h → + 0 ( 1 0 0 − h ∑ k = 1 m ( ( h − 1 ) 2 k − 1 + 1 ) )
= lim h → + 0 ( 1 0 0 − h ∑ k = 1 m ( ( 2 k − 1 ) h + h 2 × ( ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ ) ) ) = 1 0 0 − ∑ k = 1 m ( 2 k − 1 )
= 1 0 0 − m 2
.
Apply the same method to lim h → + 0 − h p ( − 1 − h ) − p ( − 1 ) and you'll get lim h → + 0 − h p ( − 1 − h ) − p ( − 1 ) = − 1 0 0 + m 2 .
.
Nice, so we need to make the natural number m satisfy lim h → + 0 h p ( x + h ) − p ( x ) = lim h → + 0 − h p ( x − h ) − p ( x ) .
So the equation would be 1 0 0 − m 2 = − 1 0 0 + m 2 . Simplify that and we'll get m 2 = 1 0 0 .
∴ m = 1 0 .
.
∴ n = 2 m − 1 = 1 9 o r n = 2 m = 2 0 .
So the value we're trying to get is 1 9 + 2 0 = 3 9 .
.
Answer: 39