S = 1 ⋅ 2 ⋅ 3 1 + 3 ⋅ 4 ⋅ 5 1 + 5 ⋅ 6 ⋅ 7 1 + 7 ⋅ 8 ⋅ 9 1 + 9 ⋅ 1 0 ⋅ 1 1 1 + ⋯
The sum S can be expressed in the form ln A − A 1 , where A is a prime number.
What is A ?
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
How did u get ln 2????
Use the identity ( 2 n − 1 ) 2 n ( 2 n + 1 ) 1 = 2 n − 1 1 / 2 − 2 n 1 + 2 n + 1 1 / 2 to rewrite as n = 1 ∑ ∞ ( 2 n − 1 ) 2 n ( 2 n + 1 ) 1 = ( 1 1 / 2 − 2 1 + 3 1 / 2 ) + ( 3 1 / 2 − 4 1 + 5 1 / 2 ) + ( 5 1 / 2 − 6 1 + 7 1 / 2 ) + ⋯ = 1 1 / 2 − 2 1 + 3 1 − 4 1 + 5 1 − ⋯ = − 2 1 + ( 1 − 2 1 + 3 1 − 4 1 + 5 1 − ⋯ ) = − 2 1 + ln 2 . So the answer is 2 .
Would you mind deriving the identity for the full solution?
S = 1 ⋅ 2 ⋅ 3 1 + 3 ⋅ 4 ⋅ 5 1 + 5 ⋅ 6 ⋅ 7 1 + ⋯ = 2 1 ( 1 1 − 2 2 + 3 1 + 3 1 − 4 2 + 5 1 + 5 1 − 6 2 + 7 1 + ⋯ ) = 2 1 ( 1 1 + 1 1 − 2 2 + 3 2 − 4 2 + 5 2 − 6 2 + 7 2 − ⋯ ) − 2 1 = ( 1 1 − 2 1 + 3 1 − 4 1 + 5 1 − 6 1 + 7 1 − ⋯ ) − 2 1 = ln 2 − 2 1 By partial fraction decomposition
Therefore, A = 2 .
How can we show that this infinite sum equals ln 2 − 2 1 ?
Log in to reply
Nope, the solution isnot complete yet ! I think its mistakenly been posted.
Sorry, I thought I have deleted it.
1/(1 2 3) + 1/(3 4 5) + 1/(5 6 7) + 1/(7 8 9) = 0.19007936507
ln(2)-1/2 = 0.19314718056
ln(3)-1/3 = 0.76527895533
At this point we can start guessing from 2, but we can just approximate the remaining terms by rounding down to a 10 power, 100 (1/10^3)+1000 1/(100^3)+10000*(1/1000^3)<0.2 so it will not reach ln(3)-1/3
I think showing the form of the solution is a big help, you should ask for the value.
Can someone explain to me why this doesn't work? LaTeX: n = 0 ∑ ∞ α n = 0 ∑ ∞ α e ∑ n = 0 ∞ α = ln A − ln [ e 1 / A ] = ln [ A e − 1 / A ] = A e − 1 / A Therefore comparing the coefficients, A = 1
where did the extra 1 come from in line 3?
Looking at the first term I noticed that S is slightly more than 6 1 . I mentally estimated that the value of ln A − A 1 would be sufficiently more than 6 1 if A = 3 since ln 3 − 3 1 > 1 − 3 1 = 3 2 . That meant I could confidently guess that the only prime left to be "a little more than 6 1 " would have to be A = 2 .
Not as elegant as some other solutions, but streightforward:
S = 1 ⋅ 2 ⋅ 3 1 + 3 ⋅ 4 ⋅ 5 1 + … = n = 0 ∑ ∞ ( 2 n + 1 ) ( 2 n + 2 ) ( 2 n + 3 ) 1 = n = 0 ∑ ∞ [ 2 ( 2 n + 1 ) 1 − 2 n + 2 1 + 2 ( 2 n + 3 ) 1 ] .
The last line can be obtained by partial fraction decomposition. By an index shift the last term can be rewritten in the form of the first,
n = 0 ∑ ∞ 2 ( 2 n + 3 ) 1 = n = − 1 ∑ ∞ 2 ( 2 n + 1 ) 1 − 2 ( − 2 + 1 ) 1 = n = 0 ∑ ∞ 2 ( 2 n + 1 ) 1 − 2 1 .
Therefore
S = n = 0 ∑ ∞ [ 1 1 + 3 1 + … 2 n + 1 1 − 2 1 − 4 1 − … − 2 n + 2 1 ] − 2 1 .
The denominator of the first fraction runs over all positive odd numbers, while the denominator of the second fraction runs over all positive even numbers. Since the sign is different, we find an alternating harmonic series,
S = ln 2 n = 1 ∑ ∞ n ( − 1 ) n + 1 − 2 1 .
So A = 2 .
I like you approach. Upvote. :)
Good for you lol
Plese split the the terms into some partial fractions and then proceed
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
S = 1 ⋅ 2 ⋅ 3 1 + 3 ⋅ 4 ⋅ 5 1 + 5 ⋅ 6 ⋅ 7 1 + 7 ⋅ 8 ⋅ 9 1 + 9 ⋅ 1 0 ⋅ 1 1 1 + ⋯ S = 1 ⋅ 2 ⋅ 3 3 − 2 + 3 ⋅ 4 ⋅ 5 5 − 4 + 5 ⋅ 6 ⋅ 7 7 − 6 + 7 ⋅ 8 ⋅ 9 9 − 8 + 9 ⋅ 1 0 ⋅ 1 1 1 1 − 1 0 + ⋯ S = 2 ⋅ 3 1 + 3 ⋅ 4 1 + 5 ⋅ 6 1 + ⋯ − ( 3 ⋅ 5 1 + 5 ⋅ 7 1 + 7 ⋅ 9 1 + ⋯ ) S = 2 1 − 3 1 + 3 1 − 4 1 + ⋯ − 2 1 ( 3 1 − 5 1 + 5 1 − 7 1 + 7 1 + ⋯ ) S = 1 − 1 + 2 1 + 3 1 − 4 1 + ⋯ − 3 1 − 2 1 × 3 1 S = ln 2 − 3 1 ( 1 + 2 1 ) = ln 2 − 2 1
Hence, ln A − A 1 = ln 2 − 2 1 ⟹ A = 2 .