A difference in maxima and minima

Algebra Level 5

Given that the real numbers a a , b b , c c , d d , and e e satisfy the equations:

a + b + c + d + e = 8 a + b + c + d + e = 8

a 2 + b 2 + c 2 + d 2 + e 2 = 16 , a^2 + b^2 + c^2 + d^2 + e^2 = 16,

the difference in the maximum and minimum values of a a can be written as A B \frac {A}{B} where A A and B B are positive, coprime integers. Find the value of A + B A + B .


The answer is 21.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

2 solutions

A familiar problem from USAMO....

b + c + d + e = 8 - a

b^2 + c^2 + d^2 + e^2 = 16 - a^2

Using Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality:

(1 + 1 + 1 + 1)(b^2 + c^2 + d^2 + e^2) >= (b + c + d + e)^2 4(16 - a^2) >= (8 - a)^2 5a^2 - 16a <= 0 and so..

0 <= a <= 16/5. Hence, the answer.

In your second to last line, where does the 4 come from in 4 ( 16 a 2 ) 4(16-a^2) and why is the first equation in that line useful if it doesn't even have an a in it.

Trevor Arashiro - 6 years, 10 months ago

Log in to reply

Using Schwartz inequality u can write. b as b.1 c as c.1. similarly....all...this add up to 1^2+ 1^2+1^2+1^2=4

Sady Stark - 6 years, 10 months ago

Really nyc solution :)

Ayush Garg - 6 years, 3 months ago

Cauchy Schwarz inequality is valid only for positive reals. Although I myself find this surprising that the answers do come by using the inequality even if the variables are not given to be positive. Can anyone tell why it works?

Vilakshan Gupta - 3 years, 1 month ago
Himanshu Arora
Jun 19, 2014

It is intuitive that at maximum and minimum values of a the other variables are equal, (by symmetry) Plugging back in the equation we get a + 4 b = 8 a 2 + 4 b 2 = 16 a+4b=8 \\ a^{2}+4b^{2}=16 \\ Solving these two we get the two values of a as 16/5 and 0. Hence the answer 21 \boxed{21}

I like this user for his quirky approaches which most of the time end up being right!!! So LOL!!!

Jayakumar Krishnan - 6 years, 10 months ago

this is not a rigorous proof.

mathh mathh - 6 years, 11 months ago

Log in to reply

This is not even a proof.

Peter Finn - 6 years, 10 months ago

this is valid if u consider the symmetry of the problem and the common observation that minimas and maximas occur usually with some special features

like a square has the largest area among all rectangles with common perimeter, or like the range of projectile thrown from any point to any other is maximum when the time taken for that is unique,,

but yes it is not rigorious

Mvs Saketh - 6 years, 8 months ago

U fkd the value of question bro but nice method

Satyam Tripathi - 4 years, 9 months ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...