Aaron just learned that and concludes that .
Is Aaron correct?
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Aaron knows that tan θ = cos θ sin θ . Therefore, tan θ = sin θ ∀ θ such that cos θ = 1 , or sin θ = 0 . He notes that this happens when θ = 0 . Since ∣ cos θ ∣ ≤ 1 ∀ θ , we see that the magnitude of tan θ is at least that of sin θ . As shown earlier, we know that sin 0 = tan 0 = 0 , however this also happens for sin θ = tan θ = 0 when θ = n π , n ∈ Z . Therefore, Aaron is incorrect because he didn't account for the fact that sin θ is a periodic function and has an infinite number of zeros. A correct statement would have been ∣ sin θ ∣ ≤ ∣ tan θ ∣ ∀ θ .