A late 2020 Easter math problem (No calculators, Python, or WolframAlpha!)

Let d ( n ) d\left(n\right) represent the sum of the digits of n in base 10

Find d ( d ( d ( 41 2 2020 ) ) ) d\left(d\left(d\left(412^{2020}\right)\right)\right)


The answer is 7.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

1 solution

Chris Lewis
Apr 14, 2020

Let n = 41 2 2020 n=412^{2020} . We first want to find how many digits n n has. We could estimate some powers of 412 412 and compare these to powers of ten, but we don't actually even need to do that.

Since 412 < 1 0 3 412<10^3 , we have 41 2 2020 < 1 0 6060 412^{2020}<10^{6060} , so that n n has at most 6060 6060 digits.

The largest possible d ( n ) d(n) would be obtained if all these digits were equal to 9 9 ; in other words d ( n ) 9 × 6060 = 54540 d(n)\le9\times 6060=54540 .

This has 5 5 digits. So d ( d ( n ) ) 9 × 5 = 45 d(d(n))\le 9 \times 5=45 (we could be more careful bounding this, but again we don't need to be in this case).

The largest digit sum of any positive integer less than or equal to 45 45 is d ( 39 ) = 12 d(39)=12 . Therefore d ( d ( d ( n ) ) ) 12 d(d(d(n)))\le12 .

Now, note that d ( x ) x ( m o d 9 ) d(x) \equiv x \pmod9 for any positive integer x x .

We have 412 7 ( m o d 9 ) 412 \equiv 7 \pmod9 , and that 7 3 1 7^3 \equiv 1 .

So 41 2 2019 1 412^{2019}\equiv 1 (since 2019 2019 is a multiple of 3 3 ).

Finally, n = 41 2 2020 7 n=412^{2020}\equiv 7 , so d ( d ( d ( n ) ) ) 7 ( m o d 9 ) d(d(d(n))) \equiv 7 \pmod9 as well. This, together with the fact d ( d ( d ( n ) ) ) 12 d(d(d(n)))\le12 , means that we must have d ( d ( d ( n ) ) ) = 7 d(d(d(n)))=\boxed7 .

I said no calculators! How did you get log of 412?

Math Nerd 1729 - 1 year, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

Er...just...knew it? OK, OK, time to use some shakier bounds!

Chris Lewis - 1 year, 1 month ago

I'm glad to see you edited it! After all, the whole point was to use no calculators! 🙂

Math Nerd 1729 - 1 year, 1 month ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...