x → 0 lim x 1 ∫ x 2 x e − t 2 d t
Determine if the limit above exists or not. If it does exist, find its value.
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Well, I did exactly what you've done but then I thought of doing it in another manner. I assumed the same F(x) as you did. Then I thought, "The value of this integral is always positive, whether x tends to 0+ or 0- because it simply denotes the area underneath the graph of F(x). Now, when x tends to 0-, we're dividing a positive quantity by a negative quantity, which would yield a negative number (if the value of the limit is finite) and when x tends to 0+, we're dividing a positive quantity by a positive quantity, which would yield a positive number (again, if the limit is finite). I'm not able to understand where I went wrong. Could you please help?
Log in to reply
When x → 0 − , F ( x ) is actually a negative quantity, since 2 x < x in this case. That is, F ( x ) is only a positive when the lower bound is less than the upper bound, which is not the case when x < 0 . So whether we approach 0 from the left or the right, x F ( x ) will always be a positive quantity, since when x > 0 we are dividing a positive by a positive, and when x < 0 we are dividing a negative by a negative.
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Let F ( x ) = ∫ x 2 x e − t 2 d t . Then as e − x 2 is continuous (and differentiable) over R we see that x → 0 lim F ( x ) = 0 , and so the given limit x → 0 lim x F ( x ) is of the indeterminate form 0 / 0 . As such, we can apply L'Hopital's rule, along with the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, to find that
x → 0 lim x F ( x ) = x → 0 lim 1 F ′ ( x ) = x → 0 lim ( 2 e − ( 2 x ) 2 − e − x 2 ) = 2 − 1 = 1 .