What is the limit of the following expression?
n → ∞ lim n ( 1 − 2 1 ) ( 1 − 4 1 ) ( 1 − 8 1 ) . . . ( 1 − 2 n 1 )
If you know this , you can solve this.
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
If you look at the form it is something tending towards 1 0 . Which is not an indeterminant form. Any finite no. When raised to zero gives 1 as output
@Efren Medallo Is this thought correct ?
Log in to reply
I may not be the right person to say this, but I think you are wrong in saying that the expression tends to a form 1 0 , as the number inside the radical doesn't approach 1 . The real problem here is proving the convergence of the said expression inside the radical, as only then can we say that the limit indeed exists (as if it does converge to some value k , then n → ∞ lim k n 1 = k 0 = 1 ).
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
We know that
n → ∞ lim k n 1 = 1
for any real number k .
Since our problem seeks for a limit similar to that, we just have to show whether the expression inside the exponential power n 1 actually converges.
The product
n = 1 ∏ ∞ ( 1 − 2 − n )
converges if and only if the sum
n = 1 ∑ ∞ ln ( 1 − 2 − n )
converges as well.
Now, note that n = 1 ∑ ∞ 2 − n converges. Furthermore, we can see that
n → ∞ lim 2 − n − ln ( 1 − 2 − n )
exists. (See note below)
So, by the limit comparison test, we can now say that n = 1 ∑ ∞ ln ( 1 − 2 − n ) converges, making the product
n = 1 ∏ ∞ ( 1 − 2 − n )
converge to some value k . Now that we have verified the convergence of the product in the radicand, we can now say that the limit of our original expression exists, and is 1 .
Note:
We have used − ln ( 1 − 2 − n ) for our series in the numerator of the limit comparison test, as the original sum is negative all throughout. Now, To find n → ∞ lim 2 − n − ln ( 1 − 2 − n ) , we first let x = 2 − n , simplifying our limit to
x → 0 lim x − ln ( 1 − x )
which is now solvable by L'hopital's rule, giving us 1 .