Don't leave it blank

Logic Level 1

18 12 4 5 = 59 \large 18 \ \square \ 12 \ \square \ 4 \ \square \ 5 = 59

Replace each \square with one of + , , × , ÷ +,-,\times,\div to make the equation true.

Submit your answer as a 3 digit number, where:

  • 1 1 represents + +
  • 2 2 represents -
  • 3 3 represents × \times
  • 4 4 represents ÷ \div

Example : If your answer is + , , × +, -, \times then enter the answer as 123 123 .


The answer is 341.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

9 solutions

Debmeet Banerjee
Nov 12, 2015

X, ÷,+ makes it true. Hence, 341 is the solution. 18X12÷4+5. Guys this was an easy question. This is my first solution since I joined brilliant. Please upvote!!!

Thanks for ans

suchit s - 5 years, 7 months ago

Log in to reply

Always welcome!!

Debmeet Banerjee - 5 years, 7 months ago

PEMDAS makes the answer wrong so this question is poorly written

Adan Garcia - 5 years, 6 months ago

Log in to reply

No try GEMS

Mxjd Ultimate - 1 week, 3 days ago

Using PEMDAS it does work. 18*12=216 216/4=54 54&5=59

Zach Hyde - 5 years, 6 months ago

132 would make it work as well but for some reason it claims it's wrong. 18+12x4-5=59 follow bedmas. 12x4=48 48-5=43 43+18=59

Bryce Bevans - 5 years, 7 months ago

Log in to reply

43 + 18 59 , but 61. 43 + 18 \not = 59,\text{ but 61.}

Anish Harsha - 5 years, 7 months ago

That's what I had. Told me it was wrong. I call bull.

Lee Wroblewski - 5 years, 6 months ago

you are so wrong

TaraLee Haddock - 5 years, 6 months ago
Ricky Kurniawan
Nov 13, 2015

59 is a prime number, so that we know there will be addition/substraction somewhere. Also, 59 is odd number. The only odd number available is 5, so it must be + or - before 5.

So far we have to get 54 or 64 from those 3 numbers. We know we need × to get that high. Then, the rest is quite obvious

× ÷ +

Great, I went by the same logic to :)

Rt 001 - 5 years, 6 months ago
Akshat Sharda
Nov 11, 2015

18 × 12 ÷ 4 + 5 = 59 \large 18 \ × \ 12 \ ÷ \ 4 \ + \ 5 = 59

Ervyn Manuyag
Nov 17, 2018

There is one solution and I plugged in the numbers and got the right answer which is 341

Vino Vishwa
Dec 4, 2015

18×12÷4+5=59 This is the answer

Vishal Yadav
Nov 15, 2015

Something that can be made out is as 59 59 is an integer, therefore division is only possible between 12 and 4. Again adding or subtracting 5 can only return a odd number. So, X is left. This is just getting the idea.

Moderator note:

I disagree that "the only way to get an integer is to divide by 4". For example, we could have 18 ÷ 12 × 4 + 5 18 \div 12 \times 4 + 5 to obtain an integer.

I meant to say it is only possible with respect to the answer.(You know this question is just a hit and trial.)

Vishal Yadav - 5 years, 6 months ago
Zachary Maneja
Nov 13, 2015

Numbers 4 and 5 can't be factored to equal any number with the digit 9. So I thought of using those for add or subtract. This decision wasn't final. I new the 18 and 12 can be sued factored all that together but divide. At first I added to see how big a number I or low I got nope didn't work. I kept experimenting until I got a reasonable number like 216 from multiplying. I thought I wonder what dividing by 4 might get me. I did that then boom got it. This might not always work but somehow it worked for me.

Kranthi Prabhu
Nov 13, 2015

It's such an easy question.ryt. ...using bodmas rule. ..v can solve it 18×12÷4+5

Stevan Markovic
Nov 12, 2015

Once you mutiply the first 2 numbers, i.e. 18 and 12, you get 216. From then it is easy to notice that by dividing the number with 5 you would approach the 50s levels and once you actually do it you will see it makes complete sense as you only need to add 5 to the result to reach the final number, i.e. 59.

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...