1 8 □ 1 2 □ 4 □ 5 = 5 9
Replace each □ with one of + , − , × , ÷ to make the equation true.
Submit your answer as a 3 digit number, where:
Example : If your answer is + , − , × then enter the answer as 1 2 3 .
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Thanks for ans
PEMDAS makes the answer wrong so this question is poorly written
Log in to reply
No try GEMS
Using PEMDAS it does work. 18*12=216 216/4=54 54&5=59
132 would make it work as well but for some reason it claims it's wrong. 18+12x4-5=59 follow bedmas. 12x4=48 48-5=43 43+18=59
Log in to reply
4 3 + 1 8 = 5 9 , but 61.
That's what I had. Told me it was wrong. I call bull.
you are so wrong
59 is a prime number, so that we know there will be addition/substraction somewhere. Also, 59 is odd number. The only odd number available is 5, so it must be + or - before 5.
So far we have to get 54 or 64 from those 3 numbers. We know we need × to get that high. Then, the rest is quite obvious
× ÷ +
Great, I went by the same logic to :)
There is one solution and I plugged in the numbers and got the right answer which is 341
18×12÷4+5=59 This is the answer
Something that can be made out is as 5 9 is an integer, therefore division is only possible between 12 and 4. Again adding or subtracting 5 can only return a odd number. So, X is left. This is just getting the idea.
I disagree that "the only way to get an integer is to divide by 4". For example, we could have 1 8 ÷ 1 2 × 4 + 5 to obtain an integer.
I meant to say it is only possible with respect to the answer.(You know this question is just a hit and trial.)
Numbers 4 and 5 can't be factored to equal any number with the digit 9. So I thought of using those for add or subtract. This decision wasn't final. I new the 18 and 12 can be sued factored all that together but divide. At first I added to see how big a number I or low I got nope didn't work. I kept experimenting until I got a reasonable number like 216 from multiplying. I thought I wonder what dividing by 4 might get me. I did that then boom got it. This might not always work but somehow it worked for me.
It's such an easy question.ryt. ...using bodmas rule. ..v can solve it 18×12÷4+5
Once you mutiply the first 2 numbers, i.e. 18 and 12, you get 216. From then it is easy to notice that by dividing the number with 5 you would approach the 50s levels and once you actually do it you will see it makes complete sense as you only need to add 5 to the result to reach the final number, i.e. 59.
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
X, ÷,+ makes it true. Hence, 341 is the solution. 18X12÷4+5. Guys this was an easy question. This is my first solution since I joined brilliant. Please upvote!!!