Is the expression above true?
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
The denominators of the terms in the summation is of the form k ( 2 0 1 4 − k ) . If we let x = k and y = 2 0 1 4 − k , then the condition x + y = s or k + 2 0 1 4 − k = 2 0 1 4 , where s is a constant, is met. Therefore, we can use the theorem (see proof below) above. We note that the absolute difference ∣ 2 k − 2 0 1 4 ∣ of the denominator decreases from the two ends (first and last) inward. That is { ∣ 2 k − 2 0 1 4 ∣ } = { 2 0 1 2 , 2 0 1 0 , 2 0 0 8 , . . . , 2 0 1 2 } . This means that all the denominators within is greater than the first and last denominators which is 2013. This means that all the terms within is smaller the first and last terms which is 2 0 1 3 1 .
S = 1 ⋅ 2 0 1 3 1 + 2 ⋅ 2 0 1 2 1 + 3 ⋅ 2 0 1 1 1 + ⋯ + 2 0 1 3 ⋅ 1 1 < 2013 terms 2 0 1 3 1 + 2 0 1 3 1 + 2 0 1 3 1 + ⋯ + 2 0 1 3 1 =
Yes, the sum is smaller than 1.
Proof
Let x + y = s , where s is a constant, and p = x y . Also let d = x − y , then x = 2 s + d and x = 2 s − d and p = x y = 2 s + d × 2 s − d = 4 s 2 − d 2 . As s is constant, p increases as d 2 or ∣ x − y ∣ decreases. □