For any positive integer n , the following is true:
n is divisible by 1 .
n ( n + 1 ) is divisible by 1 × 2 .
n ( n + 1 ) ( n + 2 ) is divisible by 1 × 2 × 3 .
Is it true that n ( n + 1 ) ( n + 2 ) ( n + 3 ) must be divisible by 1 × 2 × 3 × 4 ?
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
I will prove the general case:
k ! ∣ m = 0 ∏ k − 1 ( n + m ) !
Note that the RHS is just ( n − 1 ) ! ( n + k − 1 ) ! .
Furthermore, since all binomial coefficients are integers, it follows that ( n − 1 n + k − 1 ) is an integer.
Thus, k ! ( n − 1 ) ! ( n + k − 1 ) ! is an integer, so
k ! ∣ ( n − 1 ) ! ( n + k − 1 ) !
Thus, proven.
Apply the pigeonhole principle. Since this is the product of 4 consecutive numbers, at least one of them must be divisible by 4. A similar argument states that it is divisible by 2 and 3, and hence we are done.
yes this is what I thought too!
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
To prove that n ( n + 1 ) ( n + 2 ) ( n + 3 ) is divisible by 1 × 2 × 3 × 4 = 2 4 , we need to check for divisibility by 8 and by 3.
Among any four consecutive positive integers, there is exactly one multiple of 4 and two multiples of 2 (including the multiple of 4). Thus, the product of any four consecutive positive integers must be divisible by 2 × 4 = 8 .
Among any four consecutive positive integers, at least one must be a multiple of 3. Thus, the product of any four positive consecutive must be divisible by 3.
Since the product of four consecutive positive integers is divisible by both 8 and 3, we conclude that it is also divisible by 24. ■