Refresh your NT!

Take some time to read the following statements.

[ 1 ] [1] It is impossible to write 1 1 as the sum of the reciprocals of n n odd integers when n n is an even number.

[ 2 ] [2] If n n is an integer greater than 11 11 , then it is always possible to write n n as the sum of two composite numbers.

[ 3 ] [3] If a a is an irrational number, it is impossible for a 2 a^{\sqrt{2}} to be a rational number.

Which of these statements are correct?

Note : This problem is a part of the set "I Don't Have a Good Name For This Yet". See the rest of the problems here . And when I say I don't have a good name for this yet, I mean it. If you like problems like these and have a cool name for this set, feel free to comment here .

All of them are correct [ 1 ] [1] and [ 2 ] [2] [ 1 ] [1] and [ 3 ] [3] Only [ 1 ] [1]

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

1 solution

Sean Ty
Jul 30, 2014

1. 1. We first assume that 1 can be written as the sum of the reciprocals of n n odd integers when n n is an even number.

Let 1 a 1 + 1 a 2 + . . . . + 1 a n = 1 \displaystyle \dfrac{1}{a_1}+\dfrac{1}{a_2}+....+\dfrac{1}{a_n}=1 (Where a 1 , a 2 , . . . . a n a_1,a_2,....a_n are odd numbers and n n is even.)

Taking their sum, we get m a 1 + m a 2 + . . . . . + m a n m \displaystyle \dfrac{\dfrac{m}{a_1}+\dfrac{m}{a_2}+.....+\dfrac{m}{a_n}}{m} (Where m = i = 1 n a i \displaystyle m=\prod_{i=1}^{n}a_i )

Since a 1 , a 2 , . . . . a n a_1, a_2, ....a_n are all odd, then their product m m is also odd. By parity, the expression m a 1 + m a 2 + . . . . . + m a n m \displaystyle \dfrac{\dfrac{m}{a_1}+\dfrac{m}{a_2}+.....+\dfrac{m}{a_n}}{m} is even. And so it is impossible to obtain a 1 1 .

2. 2. Let a > 11 a>11 .

We can rewrite a = ( a 4 ) + 4 = ( a 6 ) + 6 = ( a 8 ) + 8 a=(a-4)+4=(a-6)+6=(a-8)+8 .

One of a 4 , a 6 , a 8 a-4,a-6,a-8 is divisible by 3.

So it is always possible to write n n as the sum of 2 2 composite numbers.

3. 3. I merely used the case of e i π = 1 e^{i\pi}=-1 . So pretty much a guess. Anyone has a proof for this?

(\sqrt{2}^\sqrt{2})^{\sqrt{2}}=2

lawrence Bush - 6 years, 10 months ago

I misread the third statement and thought it said it is POSSIBLE, not IMPOSSIBLE. Ugh.

For #3, I don't see what you mean by the e i π = 1 e^{i \pi} = -1 example. Care to explain what you mean? The most commonly known way to solve #3 is this:

Let P = 2 2 P = \sqrt{2}^{\sqrt{2}} . Then if P P is rational, we are done ( a = 2 a = \sqrt{2} ). If not, then P P is irrational, and P 2 = ( 2 ) 2 = 2 P^{\sqrt{2}} = (\sqrt{2})^2 = 2 and this is rational. Thus, the statement is proven.

Though unimportant to the proof, it has been proven that P P is irrational.

Michael Tong - 6 years, 10 months ago

@Sean Ty , I don't understand your argument for 3.

Mursalin Habib - 6 years, 9 months ago

Log in to reply

Haha, I'm sorry. It was meant to be a troll. Actually, from the choices I could already pick my answer. Sorry for the misconceptions!

Sean Ty - 6 years, 9 months ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...