Take some time to read the following statements.
It is impossible to write as the sum of the reciprocals of odd integers when is an even number.
If is an integer greater than , then it is always possible to write as the sum of two composite numbers.
If is an irrational number, it is impossible for to be a rational number.
Which of these statements are correct?
Note : This problem is a part of the set "I Don't Have a Good Name For This Yet". See the rest of the problems here . And when I say I don't have a good name for this yet, I mean it. If you like problems like these and have a cool name for this set, feel free to comment here .
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
1 . We first assume that 1 can be written as the sum of the reciprocals of n odd integers when n is an even number.
Let a 1 1 + a 2 1 + . . . . + a n 1 = 1 (Where a 1 , a 2 , . . . . a n are odd numbers and n is even.)
Taking their sum, we get m a 1 m + a 2 m + . . . . . + a n m (Where m = i = 1 ∏ n a i )
Since a 1 , a 2 , . . . . a n are all odd, then their product m is also odd. By parity, the expression m a 1 m + a 2 m + . . . . . + a n m is even. And so it is impossible to obtain a 1 .
2 . Let a > 1 1 .
We can rewrite a = ( a − 4 ) + 4 = ( a − 6 ) + 6 = ( a − 8 ) + 8 .
One of a − 4 , a − 6 , a − 8 is divisible by 3.
So it is always possible to write n as the sum of 2 composite numbers.
3 . I merely used the case of e i π = − 1 . So pretty much a guess. Anyone has a proof for this?