A Permutation Teaser

Algebra Level 5

Let { a 1 , a 2 a 6 } \{a_1,a_2\ldots a_6\} be a permutation of { 1 , 2 , 6 } \{1,2,\ldots 6\} .

How many permutations satisfy that ( a 1 + 1 2 ) ( a 2 + 2 2 ) ( a 6 + 6 2 ) > 6 ! \left(\dfrac{a_1+1}{2}\right)\left(\dfrac{a_2+2}{2}\right)\cdots \left(\dfrac{a_6+6}{2}\right) > 6!


The answer is 719.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

3 solutions

Joel Tan
Oct 29, 2014

By AM-GM, a i + i 2 i a i a_{i}+i \geq 2\sqrt {ia_{i}} with equality only if a i = i , i = 1 , 2 , 3 , . . . , 6 a_{i}=i, i=1, 2, 3, ..., 6 . Hence the product is always greater than or equal to 1 × 2 × 3 × 4 × 5 × 6 × a 1 × a 2 × . . . × a 6 = 6 ! \sqrt {1×2×3×4×5×6×a_{1}×a_{2}×...×a_{6}}= 6!

However equality can occur (by AM-GM) iff a i = i a_{i}=i for i = 1 , 2 , . . . , 6 i=1, 2, ..., 6 . The other 6 ! 1 6!-1 permutations thus satisfy the condition and the answer is 6 ! 1 = 719 6!-1=719 .

The general answer for the number of permutations of { 1 , 2 , , n } \{1,2,\ldots,n\} that satisfy a 1 + 1 2 a n + n 2 > n ! \frac{a_1+1}{2}\cdots\frac{a_n+n}{2}\gt n! is n ! 1 n! -1 , and here is an inductive proof.

The solution is easily confirmed for n = 2 n=2 .

Assume the solution is correct for n = k 1 n=k-1 . For the n = k n=k case, division by k k shows that the inequality holds for all non-trivial permutations with a k = k a_{k}=k .

Next, assume we have a permutation where k = a i k=a_i with i < k i<k . Then by the above paragraph, it suffices to show that a 1 + 1 2 a k + k 2 > a 1 + 1 2 a k + i 2 k + k 2 \frac{a_1+1}{2}\cdots\frac{a_{k}+k}{2}\gt\frac{a_1+1}{2}\cdots \frac{a_{k}+i}{2}\cdots\frac{k+k}{2} where the second expression is gotten from the first by swapping a i a_i and a k a_{k} , and letting all other terms stay.

Cancelling equal terms and multiplying by 4 4 , this is equivalent to ( k + i ) ( a k + k ) > ( a k + i ) ( ( k + k ) (k+i)(a_{k} +k)\gt (a_{k}+i)((k+k) Distributing and simplifying gives k 2 + i a k > k a k + i k k^2+ia_k\gt ka_k + ik which is true by the rearrangement inequality.

Deepan Iim A
Nov 23, 2014

By simple observation, one could say that, smallest possible arrangement satisfying the condition is 123456 rest all permutations would result in a greater number hence the answer would be 6!-1

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...