Determine the sum of all the odd prime numbers satisfying:
for all prime number less than ,the integer is square-free.
Notation: denotes the floor function.
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Let f ( p , q ) = p − ⌊ q p ⌋ q . Then f ( p , q ) is just the remainder upon dividing p by q .
It's not hard to see that p = 3 , 5 , 7 , 1 3 have the given property and p = 1 1 does not (because f ( 1 1 , 7 ) = 4 is not squarefree). From now on, we will assume that p > 1 3 .
If q divides p − 4 and q > 4 , then f ( p , q ) = 4 and hence f ( p , q ) is not squarefree. Since p − 4 is odd (and larger than 1), this implies that p − 4 is only divisible by 3 ; that is, it's a power of 3 . So write p = 3 k + 4 for some k ≥ 3 .
If q divides p − 8 and q > 8 , then f ( p , q ) = 8 and hence f ( p , q ) is not squarefree. Since p − 8 is odd (and larger than 1), this implies that p − 8 = 3 k − 4 is only divisible by 3 , 5 , or 7 . But 3 is impossible, so it's only divisible by 5 or 7 .
If q divides p − 9 and q > 9 , then f ( p , q ) = 9 and hence f ( p , q ) is not squarefree. Since p − 9 is not divisible by 3 (and larger than 1), this implies that p − 9 = 3 k − 5 is only divisible by 2 , 5 , or 7 . But 5 is impossible, so it's only divisible by 2 or 7 .
If q divides p − 1 2 and q > 1 2 , then f ( p , q ) = 1 2 and hence f ( p , q ) is not squarefree. Since p − 1 2 is odd (and larger than 1), this implies that p − 1 2 = 3 k − 8 is only divisible by 3 , 5 , 7 , or 1 1 . But 3 is impossible, so it's only divisible by 5 , 7 , or 1 1 .
Now, 3 k − 5 ≡ 4 , 6 mod 8 for all k , so 3 k − 5 cannot be a power of 2 (since it's larger than 4). So it's divisible by 7 . So 3 k − 4 and 3 k − 8 can't be divisible by 7 . This implies that 3 k − 4 is divisible by 5 . This implies that 3 k − 8 is not divisible by 5 .
The upshot of the above paragraph is that 3 k − 8 must be divisible by 1 1 . (Note that we are using p > 1 3 here, because that gives 3 k − 8 > 1 , so it must have at least one positive prime divisor, and 1 1 is the only one left.)
But 3 k ≡ 3 , 9 , 5 , 4 , 1 mod 1 1 , so 3 k − 8 cannot be divisible by 1 1 .
Hence no p > 1 3 has the given property, so the full list is p = 3 , 5 , 7 , 1 3 , which sum to 2 8 .