Let N be the integer whose decimal representation is a 1, followed by 2 0 0 1 2 's, and then followed by a 1. Let M = 1 1 k be the highest power of 1 1 that divides N . What is M ?
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
And I gave the answer as 3. Thinking they were asking the power - Damn !
Log in to reply
Same here bro! I though ALL Brilliant answers were from 0 to 999.
I don't see how 1 0 1 0 … 0 1 ≡ 1 0 0 1 ( m o d 1 1 ) establishes that 1 0 1 0 … 0 1 is only divisible by 1 1 once...
Log in to reply
I agree, more explanation is needed at the end. I would suggest, to deal with 1 0 2 0 0 0 + . . . + 1 0 0 + 1 use
1 0 0 n = 1 + ( 1 0 0 − 1 ) ( 1 0 0 n − 1 + . . . + 1 0 0 + 1 ) ≡ 1 + 9 9 n m o d 1 1 2
for each term. After that it's easy.
Log in to reply
P.S. That's not how I personally did it, that's just something I worked out after reading Atul Anand Sinha's solution. My way was to write 9 N / 1 1 with a binomial expansion.
I did it this way. Divide 121 by 11 you get 11^2 as the divisor divide 1221 by 11 and you get 11 as the divisor following the pattern whenever there are an even no of 2s you get 11as the divisor and when odd no of 2s u get 11^2as the divisor please verify this thank you
clarification on the last step: even powers of ten are always remainder 1 when divided by 11, because the divisibility test of 11 on a string of even numbers of 9's always work. 9-9=0, 9-9+9-9=0, etc
Your reasoning here is slightly incorrect. I'll show you how.
Suppose T = 1 0 1 0 ⋯ 1 0 1 with 1 0 0 1 ones & 1 0 0 0 zeros. You claimed T ≡ 1 0 0 1 ≡ 0 ( m o d 1 1 ) . This is fine, so let T = 1 1 k . Now you said 1 1 2 doesn't divide 1 0 0 1 , but 1 0 0 1 was evaluated ( m o d 1 1 ) & not ( m o d 1 2 1 ) . Also 1 0 0 1 ≡ 0 ( m o d 1 1 ) . So you cannot use the argument: 1 2 1 doesn't divide 9 1 .
As an explicit example, 2 7 ≡ 0 ≡ 3 ( m o d 3 ) . But 9 doesn't divide 3 lets you to conclude 9 doesn't divide 2 7 which is false.
If you add 9 1 1 = 1 . 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 . . . to the number, the result is 9 1 1 shifted over by 2 0 0 2 places. That is, x + 9 1 1 = 1 0 2 0 0 2 9 1 1 So x = 9 1 1 ( 1 0 2 0 0 2 − 1 ) It remains to find out how many times 1 1 divides 1 0 2 0 0 2 − 1 . By binomial theorem, 1 0 2 0 0 2 − 1 = i = 0 ∑ ∞ ( i 2 0 0 2 ) 1 1 i ( − 1 ) 2 0 0 2 − i − 1 = i = 0 ∑ ∞ ( − 1 ) i ( i 2 0 0 2 ) 1 1 i − 1 = i = 1 ∑ ∞ ( − 1 ) i ( i 2 0 0 2 ) 1 1 i = − ( 1 2 0 0 2 ) 1 1 1 + ( 2 2 0 0 2 ) 1 1 2 − ( 3 2 0 0 2 ) 1 1 3 + ⋯ + ( 2 0 0 2 2 0 0 2 ) 1 1 2 0 0 2 But we need only look at the first few terms. 2 0 0 2 contains exactly one factor of 1 1 , which means − ( 1 2 0 0 2 ) 1 1 1 contains two factors of 1 1 and ( 2 2 0 0 2 ) 1 1 2 contains three. All the remaining terms are clearly divisible by 1 1 3 , so everything but the first term is divisible by 1 1 3 . This means the sum is divisible by 1 1 2 but not by 1 1 3 .
Coming back to the original number, [ \frac{11}{9} 1 0 2 0 0 2 − 1 ] is therefore divisible by 1 1 exactly 3 times; the answer is 1 1 3 = 1 3 3 1 .
I boxed the wrong thing. The answer is 1 1 3 = 1 3 3 1 .
The summation must run from 0 to 2 0 0 2 , not ∞ . Apart from that, the method is quite standard. Good job!
Log in to reply
It doesn't matter whether it's to 2 0 0 2 or ∞ ; standard convention is that ( b a ) = 0 when b > a or b < 0 .
I don't understand how it gets shifted by 2002 places.What number are we adding 11/9 to?
Log in to reply
11/9 is 1.2222... We are adding this to the original number N, which is a 1 followed by a bunch of 2s and then ending in a 1. The result will be a 1 followed by a bunch of 2s followed by a decimal point and followed by 2 repeating.
Let's use the notation ( a b c ) n to denote a string of n repetitions of a b c . So, N = 1 ( 2 ) 2 0 0 1 1 .
N = 1 ( 2 ) 2 0 0 1 1 = 1 1 × ( 1 ) 2 0 0 2 .
Since 2 0 0 2 = 2 × 7 × 1 1 × 1 3 , the string of 2002 1's can be split in several ways. To mention a few:
( 1 ) 2 0 0 2 = ( 1 1 ) 1 0 0 1 = 1 1 × ( 0 1 ) 1 0 0 1 , formula (I)
( 1 ) 2 0 0 2 = ( 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ) 2 8 6 = 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 × ( 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 ) 2 8 6 , formula (II)
( 1 ) 2 0 0 2 = ( 1 ) 1 0 0 1 ( 1 ) 1 0 0 1 = ( 1 ) 1 0 0 1 × 1 ( 0 ) 1 0 0 0 1 , formula (III).
The 11-test looks like the 9-test. Where the 9-test adds all digits repeatedly and shows divisibility by 9 if the result equals 0, the 11-test alternates adding and subtracting digits: e.g. 3 7 2 3 7 6 4 gives 4 − 6 + 7 − 3 + 2 − 7 + 3 , or ( 4 + 7 + 2 + 3 ) − ( 6 + 3 + 7 ) = 0 so 3 7 2 3 7 6 4 is divisable by 11.
If a number exists of 1's (and 0's) only, in the 11-test, all 1's in odd positions will cancel out 1's in even positions.
I choose formula (I) to progress:
( 0 1 ) 1 0 0 1 is divisable by 11 because it consists of 1001 ones on the '+1 position' and the 11-test gives 1 0 0 1 ≡ 0 ( m o d 1 1 ) .
( 0 1 ) 1 0 0 1 = ( 0 1 ) 1 1 × ( 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 ) 9 1 . The number ( 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 ) 9 1 cannot be divisable by 11, using the 11-test.
So, possible extra divisors of 11 have to be found in ( 0 1 ) 1 1 .
( 0 1 ) 1 1 = 1 1 × ( 9 1 8 2 7 3 6 4 5 5 4 6 3 7 2 8 1 9 1 ) , where I added blanks to enhance reading.
Now using the 11-test, 9 1 8 2 7 3 6 4 5 5 4 6 3 7 2 8 1 9 is symmetrical, cancelling out everyting, leaving the trailing 1 to give an 11-test resulting in 1.
Concusion: N = 1 ( 2 ) 2 0 0 1 1 =
= 1 1 × ( 1 ) 2 0 0 2
= 1 1 × 1 1 × ( 0 1 ) 1 0 0 1
= 1 1 × 1 1 × ( 0 1 ) 1 1 × ( 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 ) 9 1 = 1 1 × 1 1 × 1 1 × 9 1 8 2 7 3 6 4 5 5 4 6 3 7 2 8 1 9 1 × ( 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 ) 9 1 = 1 1 3 × 9 1 8 2 7 3 6 4 5 5 4 6 3 7 2 8 1 9 1 × ( 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 ) 9 1 = N = 1 3 3 1 × 9 1 8 2 7 3 6 4 5 5 4 6 3 7 2 8 1 9 1 × ( 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 ) 9 1 .
Hi Ron Van den Burg. Interesting method ... and mostly clear, except this: Are you proving that M is exactly 1 3 3 1 , or that M is at least 1 3 3 1 ?
Followed the same approach but wrongly gave the answer as 3. And to answer Peter Byers, from the last expression, it is clear that the trailing number is not divisible by eleven because the repetition happens 91 times. That is, you get 91 1's. And 91 is not divisible by 11.
Hi Peter, I proved that M is exactly 1331, as Ishant explained (thanks). Where I wrote "... cannot be divisable by 11, using the 11-test", I proved that the last term cannot be divided by 11. Where I wrote "... leaving the trailing 1 to give an 11-test resulting in 1", I proved that the middle term in the box cannot be divided by 11.
Log in to reply
Alright, I can accept that.
This is not the easiest way to do this problem. ;)
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Use the divisibility by 1 1 criterion: The decimal number N is divisible by 1 1 if and only if the sum of the 1st, 3rd, 5th, … digits minus the sum of the 2nd, 4th, 6th, … digits is divisible by 1 1 .
The criterion shows that the given N is divisible by 1 1 . A simple division yields 1 2 2 … 2 1 ÷ 1 1 = 1 1 1 ⋯ 1 , a number of 2 0 0 2 ones. Again by the criterion, this number is divisible by 1 1 . Now 1 1 … 1 1 ÷ 1 1 = 1 0 1 0 ⋯ 1 0 1 , a number with 1 0 0 1 ones and 1 0 0 0 zeros. 1 0 0 1 is divisible by 1 1 , hence N is divisible by 1 1 3 . Now 1 0 1 0 … 0 1 = 1 0 2 0 0 0 + 1 0 1 9 9 8 + ⋯ + 1 0 2 + 1 ≡ 1 + 1 + ⋯ + 1 = 1 0 0 1 ( m o d 1 1 ) . Also 1 0 0 1 ÷ 1 1 = 9 1 , which is not divisible by 1 1 . So 1 1 3 is the largest power of 1 1 that divides N .
1 1 3 = 1 3 3 1