Divisibility by 11

Let N N be the integer whose decimal representation is a 1, followed by 2001 2001 2 2 's, and then followed by a 1. Let M = 1 1 k M = 11^k be the highest power of 11 11 that divides N N . What is M M ?


The answer is 1331.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

3 solutions

Atul Anand Sinha
Feb 2, 2014

Use the divisibility by 11 11 criterion: The decimal number N N is divisible by 11 11 if and only if the sum of the 1st, 3rd, 5th, \dots digits minus the sum of the 2nd, 4th, 6th, \dots digits is divisible by 11 11 .

The criterion shows that the given N N is divisible by 11 11 . A simple division yields 122 21 ÷ 11 = 111 1 122\dots 21 \div 11=111\cdots1 , a number of 2002 2002 ones. Again by the criterion, this number is divisible by 11 11 . Now 11 11 ÷ 11 = 1010 101 11\dots11\div11=1010\cdots101 , a number with 1001 1001 ones and 1000 1000 zeros. 1001 1001 is divisible by 11 11 , hence N N is divisible by 1 1 3 11^3 . Now 1010 01 = 1 0 2000 + 1 0 1998 + + 1 0 2 + 1 1 + 1 + + 1 = 1001 ( m o d 11 ) 1010\dots01=10^{2000}+10^{1998}+\cdots+10^2+1\equiv1+1+\cdots+1=1001\pmod {11} . Also 1001 ÷ 11 = 91 1001\div11=91 , which is not divisible by 11 11 . So 1 1 3 11^3 is the largest power of 11 11 that divides N N .

1 1 3 11^3 = 1331 \boxed{1331}

And I gave the answer as 3. Thinking they were asking the power - Damn !

Abhishek Mangal - 7 years, 4 months ago

Log in to reply

Same here bro! I though ALL Brilliant answers were from 0 to 999.

Sam Thompson - 7 years, 4 months ago

I don't see how 1010 01 1001 ( m o d 11 ) 1010\ldots01 \equiv 1001 \pmod{11} establishes that 1010 01 1010\ldots01 is only divisible by 11 11 once...

Michael Tang - 7 years, 4 months ago

Log in to reply

I agree, more explanation is needed at the end. I would suggest, to deal with 1 0 2000 + . . . + 100 + 1 10^{2000}+ ... +100+1 use

10 0 n = 1 + ( 100 1 ) ( 10 0 n 1 + . . . + 100 + 1 ) 1 + 99 n m o d 1 1 2 100^{n} =1+ (100-1)(100^{n-1}+...+100+1) \equiv 1+99n \mod {11^2}

for each term. After that it's easy.

Peter Byers - 7 years, 4 months ago

Log in to reply

P.S. That's not how I personally did it, that's just something I worked out after reading Atul Anand Sinha's solution. My way was to write 9 N / 11 9N/11 with a binomial expansion.

Peter Byers - 7 years, 4 months ago

I did it this way. Divide 121 by 11 you get 11^2 as the divisor divide 1221 by 11 and you get 11 as the divisor following the pattern whenever there are an even no of 2s you get 11as the divisor and when odd no of 2s u get 11^2as the divisor please verify this thank you

saksham bisht - 7 years, 4 months ago

clarification on the last step: even powers of ten are always remainder 1 when divided by 11, because the divisibility test of 11 on a string of even numbers of 9's always work. 9-9=0, 9-9+9-9=0, etc

Benjamin Wong - 7 years, 3 months ago

Your reasoning here is slightly incorrect. I'll show you how.

Suppose T = 1010 101 T = 1010 \cdots 101 with 1001 1001 ones & 1000 1000 zeros. You claimed T 1001 0 ( m o d 11 ) T \equiv 1001 \equiv 0 \pmod{11} . This is fine, so let T = 11 k T = 11k . Now you said 1 1 2 11^2 doesn't divide 1001 1001 , but 1001 1001 was evaluated ( m o d 11 ) \pmod{11} & not ( m o d 121 ) \pmod{121} . Also 1001 0 ( m o d 11 ) 1001 \equiv 0 \pmod{11} . So you cannot use the argument: 121 121 doesn't divide 91 91 .

As an explicit example, 27 0 3 ( m o d 3 ) 27 \equiv 0 \equiv 3 \pmod{3} . But 9 9 doesn't divide 3 3 lets you to conclude 9 9 doesn't divide 27 27 which is false.

A Brilliant Member - 7 years, 3 months ago
Caleb Stanford
Feb 8, 2014

If you add 11 9 = 1.22222222222... \frac{11}{9} = 1.22222222222... to the number, the result is 11 9 \frac{11}{9} shifted over by 2002 2002 places. That is, x + 11 9 = 1 0 2002 11 9 x + \frac{11}{9} = 10^{2002} \frac{11}{9} So x = 11 9 ( 1 0 2002 1 ) x = \frac{11}{9} (10^{2002} - 1) It remains to find out how many times 11 11 divides 1 0 2002 1 10^{2002} - 1 . By binomial theorem, 1 0 2002 1 = i = 0 ( 2002 i ) 1 1 i ( 1 ) 2002 i 1 = i = 0 ( 1 ) i ( 2002 i ) 1 1 i 1 = i = 1 ( 1 ) i ( 2002 i ) 1 1 i = ( 2002 1 ) 1 1 1 + ( 2002 2 ) 1 1 2 ( 2002 3 ) 1 1 3 + + ( 2002 2002 ) 1 1 2002 \begin{aligned} 10^{2002} - 1 &= \sum_{i=0}^\infty {2002 \choose i} 11^i (-1)^{2002-i} - 1\\ &= \sum_{i=0}^\infty (-1)^i {2002 \choose i} 11^i - 1\\ &= \sum_{i=1}^\infty (-1)^i {2002 \choose i} 11^i \\ &= - {2002 \choose 1} 11^1 + {2002 \choose 2} 11^2 - {2002 \choose 3} 11^3 + \cdots + {2002 \choose 2002} 11^{2002} \end{aligned} But we need only look at the first few terms. 2002 2002 contains exactly one factor of 11 11 , which means ( 2002 1 ) 1 1 1 - {2002 \choose 1} 11^1 contains two factors of 11 11 and ( 2002 2 ) 1 1 2 {2002 \choose 2} 11^2 contains three. All the remaining terms are clearly divisible by 1 1 3 11^3 , so everything but the first term is divisible by 1 1 3 11^3 . This means the sum is divisible by 1 1 2 11^2 but not by 1 1 3 11^3 .

Coming back to the original number, [ \frac{11}{9} 1 0 2002 1 10^{2002} - 1 ] is therefore divisible by 11 11 exactly 3 3 times; the answer is 1 1 3 = 1331 11^3 = \boxed{1331} .

I boxed the wrong thing. The answer is 1 1 3 = 1331 11^3 = \boxed{1331} .

Caleb Stanford - 7 years, 4 months ago

The summation must run from 0 0 to 2002 2002 , not \infty . Apart from that, the method is quite standard. Good job!

A Brilliant Member - 7 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

It doesn't matter whether it's to 2002 2002 or \infty ; standard convention is that ( a b ) = 0 {a \choose b} = 0 when b > a b > a or b < 0 b < 0 .

Caleb Stanford - 7 years, 3 months ago

I don't understand how it gets shifted by 2002 places.What number are we adding 11/9 to?

Weird Al - 7 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

11/9 is 1.2222... We are adding this to the original number N, which is a 1 followed by a bunch of 2s and then ending in a 1. The result will be a 1 followed by a bunch of 2s followed by a decimal point and followed by 2 repeating.

Caleb Stanford - 7 years, 1 month ago
Ron van den Burg
Feb 10, 2014

Let's use the notation ( a b c ) n (abc)_{n} to denote a string of n n repetitions of a b c abc . So, N = 1 ( 2 ) 2001 1 N=1(2)_{2001}1 .

N = 1 ( 2 ) 2001 1 = 11 × ( 1 ) 2002 N = 1(2)_{2001}1 = 11 \times (1)_{2002} .

Since 2002 = 2 × 7 × 11 × 13 2002 = 2 \times 7 \times 11 \times 13 , the string of 2002 1's can be split in several ways. To mention a few:

( 1 ) 2002 = ( 11 ) 1001 = 11 × ( 01 ) 1001 (1)_{2002} = (11)_{1001} = 11 \times (01)_{1001} , formula (I)

( 1 ) 2002 = ( 1111111 ) 286 = 1111111 × ( 0000001 ) 286 (1)_{2002} = (1111111)_{286} = 1111111 \times (0000001)_{286} , formula (II)

( 1 ) 2002 = ( 1 ) 1001 ( 1 ) 1001 = ( 1 ) 1001 × 1 ( 0 ) 1000 1 (1)_{2002} = (1)_{1001} (1)_{1001} = (1)_{1001} \times 1(0)_{1000}1 , formula (III).

The 11-test looks like the 9-test. Where the 9-test adds all digits repeatedly and shows divisibility by 9 if the result equals 0, the 11-test alternates adding and subtracting digits: e.g. 3723764 3723764 gives 4 6 + 7 3 + 2 7 + 3 4-6+7-3+2-7+3 , or ( 4 + 7 + 2 + 3 ) ( 6 + 3 + 7 ) = 0 (4+7+2+3) - (6+3+7) = 0 so 3723764 3723764 is divisable by 11.

If a number exists of 1's (and 0's) only, in the 11-test, all 1's in odd positions will cancel out 1's in even positions.

I choose formula (I) to progress:

( 01 ) 1001 (01)_{1001} is divisable by 11 because it consists of 1001 ones on the '+1 position' and the 11-test gives 1001 0 ( m o d 11 ) 1001 \equiv 0 \pmod {11} .

( 01 ) 1001 = ( 01 ) 11 × ( 0000000000000000000001 ) 91 (01)_{1001} = (01)_{11} \times (0000000000000000000001)_{91} . The number ( 0000000000000000000001 ) 91 (00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 01)_{91} cannot be divisable by 11, using the 11-test.

So, possible extra divisors of 11 have to be found in ( 01 ) 11 (01)_{11} .

( 01 ) 11 = 11 × ( 9 18 27 36 45 54 63 72 81 91 ) (01)_{11} = 11 \times (9 \: 18 \: 27 \: 36 \: 45 \: 54 \: 63 \: 72 \: 81 \: 91) , where I added blanks to enhance reading.

Now using the 11-test, 918273645546372819 918273645546372819 is symmetrical, cancelling out everyting, leaving the trailing 1 to give an 11-test resulting in 1.

Concusion: N = 1 ( 2 ) 2001 1 = N = 1(2)_{2001}1 =

= 11 × ( 1 ) 2002 = 11 \times (1)_{2002}

= 11 × 11 × ( 01 ) 1001 = 11 \times 11 \times (01)_{1001}

= 11 × 11 × ( 01 ) 11 × ( 0000000000000000000001 ) 91 = 11 \times 11 \times (01)_{11} \times (0000000000000000000001)_{91} = 11 × 11 × 11 × 9182736455463728191 × ( 0000000000000000000001 ) 91 = 11 \times 11 \times 11 \times 9182736455463728191 \times (0000000000000000000001)_{91} = 1 1 3 × 9182736455463728191 × ( 0000000000000000000001 ) 91 = 11^3 \times 9182736455463728191 \times (0000000000000000000001)_{91} = N = 1331 × 9182736455463728191 × ( 0000000000000000000001 ) 91 = \boxed{N = 1331 \times 9182736455463728191 \times (0000000000000000000001)_{91}} .

Hi Ron Van den Burg. Interesting method ... and mostly clear, except this: Are you proving that M M is exactly 1331 1331 , or that M M is at least 1331 1331 ?

Peter Byers - 7 years, 3 months ago

Followed the same approach but wrongly gave the answer as 3. And to answer Peter Byers, from the last expression, it is clear that the trailing number is not divisible by eleven because the repetition happens 91 times. That is, you get 91 1's. And 91 is not divisible by 11.

Ishant Goyal - 7 years, 3 months ago

Hi Peter, I proved that M M is exactly 1331, as Ishant explained (thanks). Where I wrote "... cannot be divisable by 11, using the 11-test", I proved that the last term cannot be divided by 11. Where I wrote "... leaving the trailing 1 to give an 11-test resulting in 1", I proved that the middle term in the box cannot be divided by 11.

Ron van den Burg - 7 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

Alright, I can accept that.

This is not the easiest way to do this problem. ;)

Peter Byers - 7 years, 3 months ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...