Physics Applied to Aristotle's Wheel

A 20 kg 20 \text{ kg} wheel consisting of a tire of radius R R and rim of radius r r makes contact with two rough surfaces. The coefficient of kinetic friction between the rim and the surface it contacts is μ k 1 = 0.2 \mu_{k_1} = 0.2 and the coefficient of static friction between these two surfaces is μ s 1 = 0.4 \mu_{s_1}= 0.4 . The coefficient of kinetic friction between the tire and the surface it contacts is μ k 2 = 0.3 μ_{k_2} = 0.3 and the coefficient of static friction between these two surfaces is μ s 2 = 0.6 \mu_{s_2} = 0.6 . The tire makes exactly one revolution as it moves at a constant speed between the positions shown in the figure. The normal forces, N 1 N_{1} and N 2 N_{2} , are equal and R = 2 r R=2r .

What is the magnitude of the force F F (in Newtons) that must be applied at the center of the wheel to keep it rolling at constant speed?

Give your answer to 1 decimal place.

Use g = 9.8 m/s 2 g = 9.8 \text{ m/s}^2 for the acceleration of gravity.


The answer is 9.8.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

1 solution

Dale Gray
Dec 29, 2016

Let f 1 f_{1} be the friction force on the rim and let f 2 f_{2} be the friction force on the tire. Since the center of the tire moves without acceleration, the net force on the tire is 0. Therefore, the vertical forces on the wheel must add to 0. Likewise, the horizontal forces on the wheel must add to 0. Thus, we have the equations

N 1 + N 2 m g = 0 and F + f 1 + f 2 = 0. N_1 + N_2 - mg = 0 \quad \text{ and } \quad F + f_1 + f_2 = 0 .

The equality of the normal forces gives

N 1 = m g 2 , N_1 = \dfrac{mg}2 ,

and the second equation above gives

F = f 1 f 2 . F = -f_1 - f_2 .

Let τ 1 \tau_{1} and τ 2 \tau_{2} be the torques produced by f 1 f_{1} and f 2 f_{2} , respectively, about the center of the wheel. Let τ net \tau_\text{net} be the net torque on the wheel. There is no angular acceleration, so we must have τ net = 0 \tau_\text{net}=0 . Since the only torques on the wheel are those produced by f 1 f_{1} and f 2 f_{2} , we have

τ net = τ 1 + τ 2 = 0. \tau_\text{net} = \tau_1 + \tau_2 = 0 .

Hence,

τ 1 = τ 2 . \tau_1 = -\tau_2 .

However,

τ 1 = f 1 r | \tau_1 | = |f_1| r and τ 2 = f 2 R |\tau_2 | = |f_2| R .

Therefore,

f 2 R = f 1 r . |f_2 | R = |f_1| r .

Since the center of the wheel covers a distance equal to the circumference of the tire, the tire rolls without slipping. However, the center of the rim moves a distance greater than the circumference of the rim and the rim must therefore slip on the surface it contacts. This means that the friction f 1 f_{1} is kinetic friction. Furthermore, f 1 f_{1} is to the left in the figure above. Letting the direction to the left be negative, we have, from the net torque equation above,

τ 2 = f 2 R = τ 1 = f 1 r = μ k 1 N 1 r . \tau_2 =f_2 R = -\tau_1 = -f_1 r = \mu_{k_1} N_1 r .

Thus,

f 2 = μ k 1 N 1 r R , f_2 = \mu_{k_1} N_1 \dfrac rR,

and consequently,

F = μ k 1 N 1 ( 1 r R ) = 0.2 m g 2 ( 1 r R ) = 9.8 Newtons . F = \mu_{k_1} N_1 \left(1 - \dfrac rR \right) = 0.2 \cdot \dfrac{mg}2 \left(1 - \dfrac rR \right) = \boxed{9.8} \text{ Newtons}.

simple,yet elegant :)

thanks for a nice problem!

Rohith M.Athreya - 4 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

I'm glad you enjoyed it.

Dale Gray - 4 years, 5 months ago

Nice one! Scratched my head for awhile thinking about the constraints. I find myself reflecting on the mantra below while solving things like this:

That which can't happen ......... won't
That which can happen ........... might
That which must happen ......... will

Steven Chase - 4 years, 5 months ago

The inspiration for this problem came from Aristotle's wheel paradox , in which Aristotle erroneously assumes both wheels (the tire and the rim here) can roll without slipping. He then makes the paradoxical conclusion that the circumference of the small wheel is equal to that of the large wheel!

Dale Gray - 4 years, 5 months ago

Why can we not take static friction instead of kinetic friction ? @Dale Gray

Anubhav Tyagi - 4 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

Because there is skidding between the rim and the surface it contacts. As far as the tire is concerned, there is no slipping, but we don't know that the static friction reaches the maximum value and therefore the coefficient of static friction and the normal force N 2 N_{2} can't be used to find the static friction force. One could, ex post facto, find the static friction force on the tire using Newton's second law with 0 acceleration.

Dale Gray - 4 years, 5 months ago

A simpler problem is to find the maximum force F such that the tire does not skid. Then you would use the kinetic friction for the rim and the maximum static friction for the tire.

Dale Gray - 4 years, 5 months ago

Thanks for the improvements of my drawing.

Dale Gray - 4 years, 5 months ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...