Let P be a point (other than the origin) on the curve y = x 4 . Let Q be the point where the normal line to the given curve at P intersects the x -axis.
With point O being the origin, form the triangle O P Q . Over all such triangles, what is the minimum value of the ratio of the base length O Q to the height of Δ O P Q ?
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
@Deepanshu Gupta Exactly the same!!!! :)
Let P have coordinates ( p , p 4 ) . (We can assume without loss of generality that p > 0 , since whatever result we find with P in the first quadrant will be the same with P in the second quadrant.) The slope of the tangent line to the curve y = x 4 at P will be 4 p 3 , and thus the equation of the normal line to the curve at P will be
y − p 4 = ( − 4 p 3 1 ) ( x − p ) .
To find point Q we substitute y = 0 to find that that the x -coordinate of Q is x = 4 p 7 + p . The ratio R of O Q to the height of Δ O P Q is then
R = p 4 4 p 7 + p = 4 p 3 + p 3 1 .
Now d p d R = 1 2 p 2 − p 4 3 = 0 when p 6 = 4 1 ⟹ p 3 = 2 1 .
This gives a minimum value for R of 4 ∗ 2 1 + 2 1 1 = 4 .
(Note that we know this will be the minimum since d p 2 d 2 R > 0 for p > 0 ).
That's interesting, Δ O P Q forms an isosceles triangle with base angles of 3 0 degrees.
That is interesting, although I'm getting a different value for the base angles. In general, looking just at the first quadrant, for the curve y = x n for integers n ≥ 2 I have that the minimum ratio Δ O P Q has a base length 2 p and sides each of length
p ∗ 1 + n 1 ,
where P ( p , p n ) is such that
p 2 n − 2 = n 1 .
The minimum ratio is R = 2 ∗ n .
The base angles θ are such that
θ = sec − 1 ( 1 + n 1 ) .
For n = 4 I get θ = sec − 1 ( 2 5 ) , which is 2 6 . 5 6 5 degrees to 5 significant figures.
Is it intuitively obvious that the minimum ratio Δ O P Q would be isosceles?
Log in to reply
I'll check this again, but it looked like to me that it's an isosceles.
Log in to reply
Yes, it's isosceles for sure, I just got a different value for the base angles, which made me wonder if I messed up somewhere.
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
L e t p o i n t P ( x , y ) s o e q u a t i o n o f n o r m a l i s : Y − y = − d y d x ( X − x ) N o w f o r P o i n t Q ( X , 0 ) Y = 0 ⟹ X = y d x d y + x ⟹ X = 4 x 7 + x s o Q ( 4 x 7 + x , 0 ) S o H i g h t o f △ P O Q = y = x 4 A n d B a s e O Q = 4 x 7 + x L e t E = H i g h t B a s e = x 4 4 x 7 + x = 4 x 3 + x 3 1 N o w F o r T o M i n i m i z e s E w e u s e F a m o u s i n e q u a l i t y f o r P o s i t i v e v a r i a b l e s i . e ( T o a v o i d C a l c u l u s ) A M ≥ G M T a k e T w o c a s e s o n ′ x ′ C a s e 1 : x > 0 ⟹ 2 4 x 3 + x 3 1 ≥ 4 x 3 . x 3 1 ⟹ E ≥ 4 ⟹ E m i n = 4 C a s e 2 : x < 0 2 ( − 4 x 3 ) + ( − x 3 1 ) ≥ ( − 4 x 3 ) . ( − x 3 1 ) ( − E m i n ) = 4 B u t P h y s i c a l l y E i s t h e R a t i o o f s i d e s S o w e t a k e m o d u l u s o f ′ E ′ ⟹ ∣ − E m i n ∣ = ∣ E m i n ∣ = 4 S o r e q u i r e d A n s w e r i s 4 .
Note: You don't need to solve These Two cases. Because By Logically thinking we conclude that There are Two such Triangles Possible for given condition. One in 1st quadrant and other in 2nd Quadrant. Both gives Same Minima so we have To calculate only For one case i.e. x>0 directly By AM-GM inequality for positive variables.