Some Abstract Calculus

Calculus Level 5

Let L ( x ) = k x L(x)=kx be a linear function for some k k , and let f ( x ) f(x) be a monic polynomial function of least degree such that for a fixed k k , the following conditions hold over x R : x \in \mathbb{R}:

  • f ( x ) f(x) is tangent to L ( x ) L(x) at some value x = p . x=p.
  • f ( x ) f(x) intersects L ( x ) L(x) perpendicularly at some value x = q . x=q.
  • p > q . p>q.

If the least possible value of p q p-q is d d , find d 2 . d^{2}.


The answer is 2.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

2 solutions

Brandon Monsen
Dec 1, 2016

First, let's look at the problem qualitatively in order to make a plan of attack, since the question doesn't give a clear-cut direction to go.

If we make an arbitrary line in the x , y x,y plane, we can begin looking for general polynomials to satisfy the conditions:

  • A line will only intersect another line once, so degree one is out
  • A parabola won't work either, since if monic it will be concave up over all x R x \in \mathbb{R} . Thus, if it is ever tangent to L ( x ) L(x) for some x = α x=\alpha , f ( x ) > L ( x ) f(x)>L(x) for x α x \neq \alpha , and will never intersect again.
  • A cubic polynomial will work, since it does have a change in concavity. We can see by drawing a sketch that if f ( x ) f(x) is monic, then k < 0 k<0 in order to satisfy all conditions and f ( x ) f(x) will touch L ( x ) L(x) from above.

Condition I: By the given conditions, we know that p , q p,q are the solutions to L ( x ) = f ( x ) L(x)=f(x) . More importantly, for tangent curves to occur at x = p x=p , then p p must be a double root. We can prove this by looking at why tangency occurs; f ( p ) L ( p ) = 0 f(p)-L(p)=0 , and for x x right around p p , f ( p ) L ( p ) > 0 f(p)-L(p)>0 .

We know that f ( x ) L ( x ) = ( x p ) ( x q ) ( x z ) f(x)-L(x)=(x-p)(x-q)(x-z) for an unknown z z . As x x increases and crosses p p , f ( x ) L ( x ) f(x)-L(x) will change sign unless z , q = p z,q=p , thus p p must be a double root for tangency to occur. It was stated that p > q p>q in the problem, so z = p z=p .

This gives f ( x ) L ( x ) = ( x p ) 2 ( x q ) f(x)-L(x)=(x-p)^{2}(x-q) , or adding L ( x ) = k x L(x)=kx to both sides, f ( x ) = ( x p ) 2 ( x q ) + k x f(x)=(x-p)^{2}(x-q)+kx .

Condition II: For f ( x ) f(x) to intersect L ( x ) L(x) perpendicularly at x = q x=q , we know that f ( q ) = L ( q ) f(q)=L(q) and f ( q ) = 1 L ( q ) f'(q)=-\frac{1}{L'(q)} .

The first condition is already met, since f ( q ) = L ( q ) = k q f(q)=L(q)=kq .

The second condition can be solved for. f ( x ) = k + ( p x ) ( p + 2 q 3 x ) = 1 L ( x ) = 1 k f'(x)=k+(p-x)(p+2q-3x)=\frac{-1}{L'(x)}=\frac{-1}{k} . Plugging in q q for x x gets 0 = q 2 2 p q + p 2 + k + 1 k 0=q^{2}-2pq+p^{2}+k+\frac{1}{k} . This is a quadratic in q q :

q = 2 p ± 4 p 2 ( 4 p 2 + 4 ( k + 1 k ) 2 = p ± ( k + 1 k ) q=\frac{2p \pm \sqrt{4p^{2}-(4p^{2}+4(k+\frac{1}{k})}}{2}=p \pm \sqrt{-(k+\frac{1}{k})}

q < p q<p , so keep the minus solution. Note that k < 0 k<0 , otherwise we don't get a real solution for q q . This supports our initial assessment that k < 0 k<0 for the conditions to be met.

Now p q = ( k + 1 k ) p-q=\sqrt{-(k+\frac{1}{k})} . The minimum value of this is 2 \sqrt{2} , thus d 2 = 2 d^{2}=\boxed{2}

Very interesting problem and solution!

A faster/cleaner presentation is to directly look at the roots of f ( x ) k x f(x) - kx . There is at least a double root at p p and a single root at q q , hence it has a degree at least 3. Hence, we can conclude that f ( x ) = ( x p ) 2 ( x q ) + k x f(x) = (x-p)^2(x-q) + kx .

Note: There are slight typos after "This is a quadratic in q q ". In particular, you are missing a negative sign in the square root.

Calvin Lin Staff - 4 years, 6 months ago

Log in to reply

Thanks for pointing out the typo! I think its fixed now.

My reasoning behind going in depth for the tangency is that I always try to take a "Explain like I'm five" approach to my solution so that my reasoning is clear, since especially on math team the solutions jump around so much and I was sometimes confused as to why certain things were happening.

I thought maybe jumping right from f ( x ) f(x) is tangent to L ( x ) L(x) right to p p is a double root might be confusing, since the reasoning isn't entirely obvious. Then again usually level 1-2s probably aren't attempting level 5 problems, so maybe I should stop with the hand holding so much. My solutions usually aren't very pretty to look at (so many words) :P

Brandon Monsen - 4 years, 6 months ago

Log in to reply

Yes, it's tricky to draw the line of "What can I assume the audience knows?". I wasn't intending it to be just a one-line expression, but instead to combine the presentation. Though, I see the value of "Let's walk through thinking about the least degree as if we don't know how to approach the problem. What happens with degree 1? degree 2? degree 3?

Calvin Lin Staff - 4 years, 6 months ago
Calvin Lin Staff
Dec 2, 2016

First, we have to figure out the least degree of the polynomial f f that satisfies the conditions. One way to do so is to consider the number of roots that it has. However, since the conditions involve the linear function L ( x ) = k x L(x) = kx , we don't have information that is purely about f ( x ) f(x) .

Instead, if we consider the function g ( x ) = f ( x ) k x g(x) = f(x) - kx , we observe that the conditions can be rewritten as:

  1. g ( x ) g(x) is tangent to the x-axis at some value x = p x =p .
  2. g ( q ) = 0 g(q) = 0 (along with some funky information that doesn't translate well as yet)

The first condition tells us that that g ( x ) g(x) has a double root at p p , and a single root at q q . Hence, g ( x ) g(x) must have degree at least 3, and is of the form g ( x ) = h ( x ) ( x p ) 2 ( x q ) g(x) = h(x) (x-p)^2 (x-q) for some polynomial h ( x ) h(x) . Since f ( x ) f(x) is of minimial degree, hence f ( x ) = g ( x ) + k x f(x) = g(x) + kx has degree exactly 3, and so h ( x ) h(x) is a constant. Since f ( x ) f(x) is monic, this implies that h ( x ) = 1 h(x) = 1 . Thus, f ( x ) = ( x p ) 2 ( x q ) + k x f(x) = (x-p)^2 (x-q) + kx .

Second, now that we know the form of f ( x ) f(x) , the only missing information is the "funky information that doesn't translate well as yet". Let's dig into it. (Taken mostly from Brandon's solution)

For f ( x ) f(x) to intersect L ( x ) L(x) perpendicularly at x = q x=q , we know that f ( q ) = L ( q ) f(q)=L(q) (which is met by our construction of f ( x ) f(x) and

f ( q ) = 1 L ( q ) k + ( p q ) ( p + 2 q 3 q ) = 1 k 0 = q 2 2 p q + p 2 + k + 1 k f'(q)=-\frac{1}{L'(q)} \Rightarrow k+(p-q)(p+2q-3q)=\frac{-1}{k} \\ \Rightarrow 0=q^{2}-2pq+p^{2}+k+\frac{1}{k}

Treating this as a quadratic in q q , we obtain

q = 2 p ± 4 p 2 ( 4 p 2 + 4 ( k + 1 k ) 2 = p ± ( k + 1 k ) . q=\frac{2p \pm \sqrt{4p^{2}-(4p^{2}+4(k+\frac{1}{k})}}{2}=p \pm \sqrt{-(k+\frac{1}{k})}.

Since q < p q<p , so we take the minus sign. Note that we must have k < 0 k<0 , otherwise we don't get a real solution for q q .

Now p q = ( k + 1 k ) p-q=\sqrt{-(k+\frac{1}{k})} . The minimum of this function is acheived at k = 1 k = - 1 , and we can set p = 0 p = 0 and q = 2 q = - \sqrt{2} which satisfy the original conditions. (In fact, the above shows that the conditions are satisfied whenever k = 1 , p q = 2 k = -1, p-q= \sqrt{2} .)

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...