A Very Average Bunch Of Numbers

Algebra Level 5

Let x 0 , x 1 , x 2 , x_0, x_1, x_2,\ldots be a sequence of a numbers satisfying the recursion,

x n = x n 1 + x n + 1 2 , x_n =\dfrac{x_{n-1} + x_{n+1}}2 ,

for n = 1 , 2 , 3 , n = 1,2,3,\ldots .

Given that x 343434 x_{343434} and x 515151 x_{515151} are non-negative real numbers whose sum is 5 5 , find the number of possible integral values of x 0 x_0 .


The answer is 26.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

3 solutions

Relevant wiki: Induction - Recurrence Relations

The recursion relation implies that x n x_n is an arithmetic progression. I choose not to use this fact but go for a more elementary approach:

Lemma : 2 x n = x n a + x n + a 2x_n = x_{n-a} + x_{n+a} .

Proof by induction on a a . The case a = 0 a = 0 is trivial, and a = 1 a = 1 is the given recursion relation. Now assume the relation is true up to some value of a 1 a \geq 1 . Then x n ( a + 1 ) + x n + ( a + 1 ) = 2 x n a x n ( a 1 ) + 2 x n + a x n + ( a 1 ) = 2 ( x n a + x n + a ) ( x n ( a 1 ) + x n + ( a 1 ) ) = 4 x n 2 x n = 2 x n , x_{n-(a+1)} + x_{n+(a+1)} \\ = 2x_{n-a} - x_{n-(a-1)} + 2x_{n+a} - x_{n+(a-1)} \\ = 2(x_{n-a}+x_{n+a}) - (x_{n-(a-1)} + x_{n+(a-1)}) \\ = 4x_n - 2x_n = 2x_n, Q.E.D.

Taking n = 343434 n = 343434 and a = 171717 a = 171717 we conclude that x 171717 + x 515151 = 2 x 343434 x 171717 = 2 x 343434 x 515151 ; x_{171717} + x_{515151} = 2x_{343434}\ \ \ \therefore\ \ \ x_{171717} = 2x_{343434} - x_{515151}; similarly, x 0 + x 343434 = 2 x 171717 x 0 = 2 x 171717 x 343434 = 3 x 343434 2 x 515151 , x_0 + x_{343434} = 2x_{171717}\ \ \ \therefore\ \ \ x_0 = 2x_{171717} - x_{343434} = 3x_{343434} - 2x_{515151}, and since x 343434 + x 515151 = 5 x_{343434} + x_{515151} = 5 , we can write this as x 0 = 5 x 343434 10 or x 0 = 15 5 x 515151 . x_0 = 5x_{343434} - 10\ \ \ \text{or}\ \ \ x_0 = 15 - 5x_{515151}. Since x 343434 0 x_{343434} \geq 0 we have x 0 10 x_0 \geq -10 ; since x 515151 0 x_{515151} \geq 0 we have x 0 15 x_0 \leq 15 .

Thus x 0 x_0 can take all integer values in the range x 0 { 10 , 9 , , 14 , 15 } , x_0 \in \{ -10, -9, \dots, 14, 15 \}, showing that there are 15 ( 10 ) + 1 = 26 15 - (-10) + 1 = \boxed{26} possible values for x 0 x_0 .

Nice approach!

Geoff Pilling - 4 years, 9 months ago
Geoff Pilling
Jul 30, 2016

The first recursion relation implies an arithmetic progression.

  • x 0 , m i n = 10 x_{0,min} = -10 for x 343434 = 0 x_{343434} = 0 and x 515151 = 5 x_{515151}=5
  • x 0 , m a x = 15 x_{0,max} = 15 for x 343434 = 5 x_{343434} = 5 and x 515151 = 0 x_{515151}=0

So, x 0 x_0 has the range from 10 -10 to 15 15 .

So it has 26 \boxed{26} possible integral values.

Although @Pi Han Goh pointed out that this solution is a little unsatisfying and somewhat incomplete. Can anyone think of a more straightforward way to explain the solution?

Perhaps it helps to consider that the numbers 343434 343434 and 515151 515151 have little relevance other than that 343434 343434 is 2 3 \frac{2}{3} of 515151 515151 . So, the problem is essentially the same as if you said x 2 x_2 and x 3 x_3 , a much simpler problem to visualize/solve.

The way that I would phrase it is:

x 0 + 2 x 515151 = 3 x 343434 x_0 + 2 x_{515151} = 3x_{343434} by properties of arithmetic progressions. (You can show it via the a + ( n 1 ) d a + (n-1) d substitution.)
Hence, x 0 = 3 x 343434 2 x 515151 = 15 5 x 515151 x_0 = 3x_{343434} - 2x_{515151} = 15 - 5 x_{515151} .
Since 0 x 515151 5 0 \leq x_{515151} \leq 5 , it follows that 15 x 0 10 15 \geq x_0 \geq -10 , and so there are 26 possible values for x 0 x_0 .

Calvin Lin Staff - 4 years, 10 months ago

Log in to reply

Ah yes... That's the verbiage I was looking for! :)

Geoff Pilling - 4 years, 10 months ago

oh my god, i forgot about zero, damn it !! i was going mad why 25 is wrong , i would have had been level 5 in algebra.

A Former Brilliant Member - 4 years, 9 months ago
James Pohadi
Aug 5, 2016

x n = x n 1 + x n + 1 2 2 x n = x n 1 + x n + 1 x n + x n = x n 1 + x n + 1 x n x n 1 = x n + 1 x n \begin{aligned} x_n & =\dfrac{{x}_{n-1} + {x}_{n+1}}{2} \\ 2{x}_{n} & ={x}_{n-1} + {x}_{n+1} \\ {x}_{n}+{x}_{n} & ={x}_{n-1} + {x}_{n+1} \\ {x}_{n}-{x}_{n-1} & ={x}_{n+1} - {x}_{n} \end{aligned}

Let x n x n 1 = x n + 1 x n = k {x}_{n}-{x}_{n-1}={x}_{n+1} - {x}_{n}=k , then x n 1 = x n k {x}_{n-1}={x}_{n}-k and x n + 1 = x n + k {x}_{n+1}={x}_{n}+k

x n 1 , x n , x n + 1 x n k , x n , x n + k {x}_{n-1},{x}_{n},{x}_{n+1} \Leftrightarrow {x}_{n}\color{#3D99F6}{-k}, {x}_{n}, {x}_{n}\color{#3D99F6}{+k} (it shows us that x n {x}_{n} follow aritmetical progression)

Then, we can get that x n = x 0 + n k {x}_{n}={x}_{0}+nk

n = 343434 x 343434 = x 0 + 343434 k n=343434 \implies {x}_{343434}={x}_{0}+343434k

n = 515151 x 515151 = x 0 + 515151 k n=515151 \implies {x}_{515151}={x}_{0}+515151k

x 343434 + x 515151 = ( x 0 + 343434 k ) + ( x 0 + 515151 k ) 5 = x 0 + 343434 k + x 0 + 515151 k 5 = 2 x 0 + 858585 k 5 2 x 0 = 858585 k k = 5 2 x 0 858585 \begin{aligned} {x}_{343434}+{x}_{515151} & =({x}_{0}+343434k)+({x}_{0}+515151k) \\ 5 & ={x}_{0}+343434k+{x}_{0}+515151k \\ 5 & =2{x}_{0}+858585k \\ 5-2{x}_{0} & =858585k \\ k & =\dfrac{5-2{x}_{0}}{858585} \end{aligned}

x 343434 0 x 0 + 343434 k 0 x 0 + 343434 × 5 2 x 0 858585 0 x 0 + 2 5 ( 5 2 x 0 ) 0 x 0 + 2 4 5 x 0 0 1 5 x 0 2 x 0 10 \begin{aligned} {x}_{343434} & \geq 0 \\ {x}_{0}+343434k & \geq 0 \\ {x}_{0}+343434 \times \dfrac{5-2{x}_{0}}{858585} & \geq 0 \\ {x}_{0}+\dfrac{2}{5}(5-2{x}_{0}) & \geq 0 \\ {x}_{0}+2-\dfrac{4}{5} {x}_{0} & \geq 0 \\ \dfrac{1}{5}{x}_{0} & \geq -2 \\ {x}_{0} & \geq -10 \end{aligned}

x 515151 0 x 0 + 515151 k 0 x 0 + 515151 × 5 2 x 0 858585 0 x 0 + 3 5 ( 5 2 x 0 ) 0 x 0 + 3 6 5 x 0 0 3 1 5 x 0 15 x 0 x 0 15 \begin{aligned} {x}_{515151} & \geq 0 \\ {x}_{0}+515151k & \geq 0 \\ {x}_{0}+515151 \times \dfrac{5-2{x}_{0}}{858585} & \geq 0 \\ {x}_{0}+\dfrac{3}{5}(5-2{x}_{0}) & \geq 0 \\ {x}_{0}+3-\dfrac{6}{5} {x}_{0} & \geq 0 \\ 3 & \geq \dfrac{1}{5}{x}_{0} \\ 15 & \geq {x}_{0} \\ {x}_{0} & \leq 15 \end{aligned}

10 x 0 15 \implies -10 \leq {x}_{0} \leq 15

So, the number possible integral values of x 0 {x}_{0} is 26 \boxed{26}

Nice write up, James! (cc'ing @Pi Han Goh who will likely be interested)

Geoff Pilling - 4 years, 10 months ago

Log in to reply

Thanks Sir @Geoff Pilling, it's a nice question too, I like it!

James Pohadi - 4 years, 10 months ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...