Let's reiterate about Ackerman function .
Unlike what's suspected , this function actually doesn't grow as quickly as Ackermann function!
Let . It turns out that is a polynomial for all sufficiently large ; that is, there exists some integer and a polynomial such that for all integer , . The sum of the coefficients of can be expressed as for some positive integers that are relatively prime. Compute .
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Firstly we check S ( n ) function from n = 1 , 2 , . . . , 1 1 from this problem using this ackermann:
We get
S ( 0 ) = 1
S ( 1 ) = 7
S ( 2 ) = 2 1
S ( 3 ) = 4 7
S ( 4 ) = 8 8
S ( 5 ) = 1 4 9
S ( 6 ) = 2 3 4
S ( 7 ) = 3 4 7
S ( 8 ) = 4 9 2 ,
S ( 9 ) = 6 7 3
S ( 1 0 ) = 8 9 4
S ( 1 1 ) = 1 1 5 9
Now, analyze this sequence using wolframalpha.com
This is graphic analyze:
alt text
This graphic analyze given 3rd differences. S ( 3 ) , S ( 4 ) , S ( 4 ) . . . have a patern in 3 rd differences.
alt text
Now, we using mathematic for solve this series:
P ( n ) = 3 2 n 3 + 2 n 2 + 3 7 n + 4
now, only check for S ( 1 2 ) , and I get S ( 1 2 ) = P ( 1 2 )
So the b a = P ( 1 ) = 9
a = 9 , b = 1 and the answer is a + b = 1 0