Actuarial Science - Part 1

There are two types of driver. Good drivers make up 75 % 75\text{\%} of the population and in one year have zero claims with probability 0.7 0.7 , one claim with probability 0.2 0.2 , and two claims with probability 0.1 0.1 . Bad drivers make up the other 25 % 25\text{\%} of the population and have zero, one, or two claims with probabilities 0.5 , 0.3 , 0.5,\,0.3, and 0.2 0.2 , respectively. For a particular policyholder suppose that an actuary has first observation zero claims and second observation one claim. The probability that the third observation more than or equal to one claim given that the previous observations can be expressed as p q \,\dfrac{p}{q} . Calculate p + q p+q .


Details and assumptions :


The answer is 257.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

2 solutions

Tunk-Fey Ariawan
Mar 27, 2014

Let N \text{N} be the random variable that denote the number of claims. Let G \text{G} and B \text{B} be random variable that denote our sample come from good drivers and bad drivers, respectively. Hence Pr [ G ] = 0.75 Pr [ B ] = 0.25 Pr [ N = 0 G ] = 0.7 Pr [ N = 1 G ] = 0.2 Pr [ N = 2 G ] = 0.1 Pr [ N = 0 B ] = 0.5 Pr [ N = 1 B ] = 0.3 Pr [ N = 2 B ] = 0.2 \begin{aligned} &\text{Pr}[\text{G}]=0.75\\ &\text{Pr}[\text{B}]=0.25\\ &\text{Pr}[\text{N}=0|\text{G}]=0.7\\ &\text{Pr}[\text{N}=1|\text{G}]=0.2\\ &\text{Pr}[\text{N}=2|\text{G}]=0.1\\ &\text{Pr}[\text{N}=0|\text{B}]=0.5\\ &\text{Pr}[\text{N}=1|\text{B}]=0.3\\ &\text{Pr}[\text{N}=2|\text{B}]=0.2\\ \end{aligned} The marginal probability for N 1 = 0 \text{N}_1=0 and N 2 = 1 \text{N}_2=1 is Pr [ N 1 = 0 N 2 = 1 ] = Pr [ N = 0 G ] Pr [ N = 1 G ] Pr [ G ] + Pr [ N = 0 B ] Pr [ B = 1 B ] Pr [ B ] = 0.7 0.2 0.75 + 0.5 0.3 0.25 = 0.1425. \begin{aligned} \text{Pr}[\text{N}_1=0\cap\text{N}_2=1]&=\text{Pr}[\text{N}=0|\text{G}]\cdot\text{Pr}[\text{N}=1|\text{G}]\cdot\text{Pr}[\text{G}]+\text{Pr}[\text{N}=0|\text{B}]\cdot\text{Pr}[\text{B}=1|\text{B}]\cdot\text{Pr}[\text{B}]\\ &=0.7\cdot0.2\cdot0.75+0.5\cdot0.3\cdot0.25\\ &=0.1425. \end{aligned} The actuary want to observe that the third observation N 3 1 \text{N}_3\ge1 given that N 1 = 0 \text{N}_1=0 and N 2 = 1 \text{N}_2=1 . Therefore, the joint probability of all posibilities is Pr [ N 1 = 0 N 2 = 1 N 3 = 1 ] = Pr [ N = 0 G ] Pr [ N = 1 G ] Pr [ N = 1 G ] Pr [ G ] + Pr [ N = 0 B ] Pr [ B = 1 B ] Pr [ N = 1 B ] Pr [ B ] = 0.7 0.2 0.2 0.75 + 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.25 = 0.03225 , Pr [ N 1 = 0 N 2 = 1 N 3 = 2 ] = Pr [ N = 0 G ] Pr [ N = 1 G ] Pr [ N = 2 G ] Pr [ G ] + Pr [ N = 0 B ] Pr [ B = 1 B ] Pr [ N = 2 B ] Pr [ B ] = 0.7 0.2 0.1 0.75 + 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.25 = 0.01800. \begin{aligned} \text{Pr}[\text{N}_1=0\cap\text{N}_2=1\cap\text{N}_3=1]&=\text{Pr}[\text{N}=0|\text{G}]\cdot\text{Pr}[\text{N}=1|\text{G}]\cdot\text{Pr}[\text{N}=1|\text{G}]\cdot\text{Pr}[\text{G}]+\text{Pr}[\text{N}=0|\text{B}]\cdot\text{Pr}[\text{B}=1|\text{B}]\cdot\text{Pr}[\text{N}=1|\text{B}]\cdot\text{Pr}[\text{B}]\\ &=0.7\cdot0.2\cdot0.2\cdot0.75+0.5\cdot0.3\cdot0.3\cdot0.25\\ &=0.03225,\\ \text{Pr}[\text{N}_1=0\cap\text{N}_2=1\cap\text{N}_3=2]&=\text{Pr}[\text{N}=0|\text{G}]\cdot\text{Pr}[\text{N}=1|\text{G}]\cdot\text{Pr}[\text{N}=2|\text{G}]\cdot\text{Pr}[\text{G}]+\text{Pr}[\text{N}=0|\text{B}]\cdot\text{Pr}[\text{B}=1|\text{B}]\cdot\text{Pr}[\text{N}=2|\text{B}]\cdot\text{Pr}[\text{B}]\\ &=0.7\cdot0.2\cdot0.1\cdot0.75+0.5\cdot0.3\cdot0.2\cdot0.25\\ &=0.01800.\\ \end{aligned} Note that each number of claim is i.i.d. , then the probability that the third observation N 3 1 \text{N}_3\ge1 given that N 1 = 0 \text{N}_1=0 and N 2 = 1 \text{N}_2=1 is Pr [ N 3 1 N 1 = 0 N 2 = 1 ] = Pr [ N 3 = 1 N 1 = 0 N 2 = 1 ] + Pr [ N 3 = 2 N 1 = 0 N 2 = 1 ] = Pr [ N 1 = 0 N 2 = 1 N 3 = 1 ] Pr [ N 1 = 0 N 2 = 1 ] + Pr [ N 1 = 0 N 2 = 1 N 3 = 2 ] Pr [ N 1 = 0 N 2 = 1 ] = 0.03225 0.1425 + 0.01800 0.1425 = 0.05025 0.1425 = 67 190 . \begin{aligned} \text{Pr}[\text{N}_3\ge1|\text{N}_1=0\cap\text{N}_2=1]&=\text{Pr}[\text{N}_3=1|\text{N}_1=0\cap\text{N}_2=1]+\text{Pr}[\text{N}_3=2|\text{N}_1=0\cap\text{N}_2=1]\\ &=\frac{\text{Pr}[\text{N}_1=0\cap\text{N}_2=1\cap\text{N}_3=1]}{\text{Pr}[\text{N}_1=0\cap\text{N}_2=1]}+\frac{\text{Pr}[\text{N}_1=0\cap\text{N}_2=1\cap\text{N}_3=2]}{\text{Pr}[\text{N}_1=0\cap\text{N}_2=1]}\\ &=\frac{0.03225}{0.1425}+\frac{0.01800}{0.1425}\\ &=\frac{0.05025}{0.1425}\\ &=\frac{67}{190}. \end{aligned} Another way to solve this Pr [ N 3 1 N 1 = 0 N 2 = 1 ] = 1 Pr [ N 3 < 1 N 1 = 0 N 2 = 1 ] = 1 Pr [ N 3 = 0 N 1 = 0 N 2 = 0 ] , \begin{aligned} \text{Pr}[\text{N}_3\ge1|\text{N}_1=0\cap\text{N}_2=1]&=1-\text{Pr}[\text{N}_3<1|\text{N}_1=0\cap\text{N}_2=1]\\ &=1-\text{Pr}[\text{N}_3=0|\text{N}_1=0\cap\text{N}_2=0], \end{aligned} which yields the same result with the previous approach. Thus, p + q = 67 + 190 = 257 p+q=67+190=\boxed{\color{#3D99F6}{257}} .


# Q . E . D . # \text{\# }\mathbb{Q.E.D.}\text{ \#}


I came across this article last year. It talks about Why Safe drivers Aren't Always Charged The Lowest Insurance Rates , which seems counterintuitive.

Calvin Lin Staff - 7 years, 2 months ago

Log in to reply

Most of car insurers use linear model to model driver's behavior. That's all I can say to you Calvin, the rest...

Maybe linear model is also used by Brilliant to determine our rating.

Tunk-Fey Ariawan - 7 years, 2 months ago

Log in to reply

Awesome solution!

Joshua Ong - 7 years, 2 months ago
Kevin Bourrillion
Apr 26, 2014

Solve the problem intuitively by considering a pool of 4000* statistically idealized drivers.

3/4 of them, or 3000, are good drivers. Multiply by 0.7 to find that 2100 of them file zero claims in the first year. Multiply that by 0.2 to see that 420 of that group file one claim the next year, and finally by 0.3 to get 126 filing one or more claims in the third year.

Likewise, 1000 are bad drivers, 500 of which have zero claims in year 1, 150 of those having one claim in year 2, and finally 75 of those that have one or more in the last year.

The policyholder in question is one of the 420 + 150 = 570 who have zero then one claims, and we're asked to find whether she is also one of the 126 + 75 = 201 who file one or more in the third year as well.

201/570 = 67/190, so the answer is 257. No big scary formulas.

(* we get this number by thinking ahead and multiplying all the denominators of the probabilities we're going to be dealing with)

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...