There are two types of driver. Good drivers make up
of the population and in one year have zero claims with probability
, one claim with probability
, and two claims with probability
. Bad drivers make up the other
of the population and have zero, one, or two claims with probabilities
and
, respectively. For a particular policyholder suppose that an actuary has first observation zero claims and second observation one claim. The probability that the third observation more than or equal to one claim given that the previous observations can be expressed as
. Calculate
.
Details and assumptions :
Each number of claims is independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) random variable.
After solving this problem, you may want to solve Actuarial Science - Part 2
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Let N be the random variable that denote the number of claims. Let G and B be random variable that denote our sample come from good drivers and bad drivers, respectively. Hence Pr [ G ] = 0 . 7 5 Pr [ B ] = 0 . 2 5 Pr [ N = 0 ∣ G ] = 0 . 7 Pr [ N = 1 ∣ G ] = 0 . 2 Pr [ N = 2 ∣ G ] = 0 . 1 Pr [ N = 0 ∣ B ] = 0 . 5 Pr [ N = 1 ∣ B ] = 0 . 3 Pr [ N = 2 ∣ B ] = 0 . 2 The marginal probability for N 1 = 0 and N 2 = 1 is Pr [ N 1 = 0 ∩ N 2 = 1 ] = Pr [ N = 0 ∣ G ] ⋅ Pr [ N = 1 ∣ G ] ⋅ Pr [ G ] + Pr [ N = 0 ∣ B ] ⋅ Pr [ B = 1 ∣ B ] ⋅ Pr [ B ] = 0 . 7 ⋅ 0 . 2 ⋅ 0 . 7 5 + 0 . 5 ⋅ 0 . 3 ⋅ 0 . 2 5 = 0 . 1 4 2 5 . The actuary want to observe that the third observation N 3 ≥ 1 given that N 1 = 0 and N 2 = 1 . Therefore, the joint probability of all posibilities is Pr [ N 1 = 0 ∩ N 2 = 1 ∩ N 3 = 1 ] Pr [ N 1 = 0 ∩ N 2 = 1 ∩ N 3 = 2 ] = Pr [ N = 0 ∣ G ] ⋅ Pr [ N = 1 ∣ G ] ⋅ Pr [ N = 1 ∣ G ] ⋅ Pr [ G ] + Pr [ N = 0 ∣ B ] ⋅ Pr [ B = 1 ∣ B ] ⋅ Pr [ N = 1 ∣ B ] ⋅ Pr [ B ] = 0 . 7 ⋅ 0 . 2 ⋅ 0 . 2 ⋅ 0 . 7 5 + 0 . 5 ⋅ 0 . 3 ⋅ 0 . 3 ⋅ 0 . 2 5 = 0 . 0 3 2 2 5 , = Pr [ N = 0 ∣ G ] ⋅ Pr [ N = 1 ∣ G ] ⋅ Pr [ N = 2 ∣ G ] ⋅ Pr [ G ] + Pr [ N = 0 ∣ B ] ⋅ Pr [ B = 1 ∣ B ] ⋅ Pr [ N = 2 ∣ B ] ⋅ Pr [ B ] = 0 . 7 ⋅ 0 . 2 ⋅ 0 . 1 ⋅ 0 . 7 5 + 0 . 5 ⋅ 0 . 3 ⋅ 0 . 2 ⋅ 0 . 2 5 = 0 . 0 1 8 0 0 . Note that each number of claim is i.i.d. , then the probability that the third observation N 3 ≥ 1 given that N 1 = 0 and N 2 = 1 is Pr [ N 3 ≥ 1 ∣ N 1 = 0 ∩ N 2 = 1 ] = Pr [ N 3 = 1 ∣ N 1 = 0 ∩ N 2 = 1 ] + Pr [ N 3 = 2 ∣ N 1 = 0 ∩ N 2 = 1 ] = Pr [ N 1 = 0 ∩ N 2 = 1 ] Pr [ N 1 = 0 ∩ N 2 = 1 ∩ N 3 = 1 ] + Pr [ N 1 = 0 ∩ N 2 = 1 ] Pr [ N 1 = 0 ∩ N 2 = 1 ∩ N 3 = 2 ] = 0 . 1 4 2 5 0 . 0 3 2 2 5 + 0 . 1 4 2 5 0 . 0 1 8 0 0 = 0 . 1 4 2 5 0 . 0 5 0 2 5 = 1 9 0 6 7 . Another way to solve this Pr [ N 3 ≥ 1 ∣ N 1 = 0 ∩ N 2 = 1 ] = 1 − Pr [ N 3 < 1 ∣ N 1 = 0 ∩ N 2 = 1 ] = 1 − Pr [ N 3 = 0 ∣ N 1 = 0 ∩ N 2 = 0 ] , which yields the same result with the previous approach. Thus, p + q = 6 7 + 1 9 0 = 2 5 7 .
# Q . E . D . #