Adjusting the Zero Point Energy

As students of quantum mechanics should know, the solution to the quantum harmonic oscillator Hamiltonian gives an elegant result:

E n = ( n + 1 2 ) ω E_n = (n+\frac{1}{2})\hbar\omega

There's a constant term in the energy when n n is zero. This is called the Zero Point Energy.

A student proposes that we get rid of this ridiculous term by simply redefining the Hamiltonian as

H = p 2 2 m + m ω 2 2 x 2 1 2 ω H=\frac{p^2}{2m}+\frac{m\omega^2}{2}x^2-\frac{1}{2}\hbar\omega

After all, we do this all the time with gravity problems simply by adjusting the reference point.

Is this student successful in removing this offset?

NO! YES!

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

1 solution

Max Yuen
Jun 10, 2019

Actually, the student is ignoring the finer details of why there's a non-zero energy in the first place.

If you apply the uncertainty principle for a particle in its ground state, say at the origin and with zero average momentum, it must be the case that

Δ x Δ p 2 \Delta x \Delta p \geq \frac{\hbar}{2} . Since the average x and p are zero, we have Δ x 2 = < x 2 > \Delta x ^2 = <x^2> and Δ p 2 = < p 2 > \Delta p^2 = <p^2> . Thus, the uncertainty principle implies that the first two terms of the Hamiltonian cannot be made simultaneously zero.

Thus, the kinetic and elastic terms are inversely proportional to each other. We all know how to minimize this type of function, and it's to make the terms equal to each other.

< p 2 2 m > = < m ω 2 2 x 2 > = A < p 2 2 m > < m ω 2 2 x 2 > = 1 4 ω 2 Δ x 2 Δ p 2 2 ω 2 16 \displaystyle \left<\frac{p^2}{2m}\right> = \left<\frac{m\omega^2}{2}x^2\right> = A \rightarrow \left<\frac{p^2}{2m}\right>\left<\frac{m\omega^2}{2}x^2\right>=\frac{1}{4}\omega^2\Delta x^2\Delta p^2\geq\frac{\hbar^2\omega^2}{16}

Thus, A = 4 A = \frac{\hbar}{4} so the Hamiltonian is ALWAYS 2 \frac{\hbar}{2} higher than any classical energy level added to the Hamiltonian.

Another problem is as the system becomes large and classical, there is no mechanism for justifying the proposed offset, and we're stuck with the same problem were started with and the classical oscillator will have an offset with quantum parameters: \hbar .

Accept the ZPE and realize that it's a natural consequence of the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle.

Additional Comment:

If we removed this ZPE, we also will not be able to derive the force law for the Casimir Effect .

Max Yuen - 2 years ago

Log in to reply

This is a bad argument. If this ZPE isnt supposed to be there, then claiming it as the explanation for something else just makes that explanation equally invalid. We should then modify our theory as needed.

Craig Dupree - 1 year, 11 months ago

I believe that removing the offset, temperature of every quantum system could be exactly zero, and we know that a small vibration exists, and therefore, temperature never reaches absolute zero.

Josep Maria Vallès - 1 year, 12 months ago

The adjustment for gravity is in how you define x. The adjustment for a SHO is also in x (ie, measure from the unstretched point) and not some arbitrary position.

Craig Dupree - 1 year, 11 months ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...