Find the number of solutions to the system of equations:
⎩ ⎨ ⎧ k 1 + k 2 + k 3 + ⋯ + k n = 5 n − 4 k 1 1 + k 2 1 + k 3 1 + ⋯ + k n 1 = 1
where k 1 , k 2 , k 3 . . . , k n , and n are positive integers.
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Great approach
Thank you very much !!!
nice problem, similar to a Putnam problem i believe.(+1)
I did the same way, and got the same answers but I didn't take into account the permutations for n = 3 . :(
There is one mistake: First inequality is not because of Cauchy-Schwarz : But because Arithmetic mean of n numbers is greater than Harmonic mean on n numbers : AM >= HM.
Please correct that part.
Log in to reply
Hello Vijay! The first part can be done using Cauchy-Schwarz inequality as well. Please note that!!
Consider the n -dimensional vectors a , b where a j = k j b j = k j 1 1 ≤ j ≤ n Then ∣ ∣ a ∣ ∣ = 5 n − 4 , ∣ ∣ b ∣ ∣ = 1 and a ⋅ b = n . By the Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality, n ≤ 5 n − 4 , which simplifies to read ( n − 1 ) ( n − 4 ) ≤ 0 , so that 1 ≤ n ≤ 4 .
Thus there are 1 + 6 + 1 = 8 solutions.
Nice solution sir
Combining two rows in the following manner we get ,
∑ i = 1 n K i = 5 n − 4 ........(a)
∑ i = 1 n ( 2 5 ) 2 K i 1 = 4 2 5 ....(b)
Subtracting (b) from (a) and subtracting 5 n from both sides of the new equation of (a)-(b) we get the following equation...
∑ i = 1 n ( K i − 2 ∗ 2 5 + K i ( 2 . 5 ) 2 ) = 4 2 5 − 4 = 2 . 2 5
∑ i = 1 n ( K i − K i 2 . 5 ) 2 = 2 . 2 5 .........(1) And say, A i = ( K i − K i 2 . 5 ) 2 .
A 1 = 2 . 2 5 , A 2 = 0 . 1 2 5 , A 3 = 0 . 0 8 3 3 3 3 . . . . , A 4 = 0 . 5 6 2 5 , A 5 = 1 . 2 5 , A 6 = 2 . 0 4 1 6 6 6 8 and A K > 2 . 2 5 for all K ≥ 7 .
Now, we shall find the maximum how many times one natural number can be there in the solution tuple. Number of permitted appearance of some integer , n ( K ) is as below
Upper bounds of K from (1)
{ n ( 2 ) ≤ 1 8 , n ( 3 ) ≤ 2 7 , n ( 4 ) ≤ 4 , n ( 5 ) ≤ 1 , n ( 6 ) ≤ 1 , n ( k ) = 0 for all k ≥ 7 }
Upper bounf of k from "the reciprocal equation "
{ n ( 2 ) ≤ 2 , n ( 3 ) ≤ 3 , n ( 4 ) ≤ ( 4 ) , n ( 5 ) ≤ ( 5 ) , n ( 6 ) ≤ ( 6 ) , . . . . }
And from both of these, we get { n ( 2 ) ≤ 2 , n ( 3 ) ≤ 3 , n ( 4 ) ≤ ( 4 ) , n ( 5 ) ≤ ( 1 ) , n ( 6 ) ≤ ( 1 ) , n ( k ≥ 7 ) = 0 }...(2). But 5 is of no use because it needs other multiples of 5 to satisfy the reciprocal equation.
So, K i can only be 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 6 . And from (2) we get ∑ 1 n K i ≤ 2 ∗ 2 + 3 ∗ 3 + 4 ∗ 4 + 6 = 3 5 ⇒ n ≤ 7 .
And from this little field we can easily find that the solutions exist for n = 1 , n = 3 , n = 4 and these are {( 1 )} ; { ( 2 , 3 , 6 ) having 6 permutations} ; { ( 4 , 4 , 4 , 4 ) }. So, there are total 8 solutions.
Note : For n = 5 , 6 , 7 we need terms like 4 , 6 more than their available quantity and more 2 , 3 to make the sum equal to 5 n − 4 , but we can't use all the available 2 , 3 because make the reciprocal sum more than 1 , and overall there is a critical situation. So, n can be only 1 , 3 , 4 .
Can you please mention which 2 rows in which following manner and how you got to the first step and all this
Log in to reply
ok i am editing fro clearence.
Ok, I have edited this and made this clear.
but where is the start of first step?
WOW. Now It is an awesome solution
Bounding is a good way to go isn't it?
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
By Cauchy-Schwarz inequality, ( k 1 + k 2 + . . . + k n ) ( k 1 1 + k 2 1 + . . . + k n 1 ) ≥ n 2 so, we have 5 n − 4 ≥ n 2 . So, we have ( n − 1 ) ( n − 4 ) ≤ 0 . This implies that 1 ≤ n ≤ 4 .Equality holds for n = 1 , 4 .From here, we will take 3 cases.
Case 1: n = 1 , 4 .
It implies that k 1 = 1 is the only possibility for n = 1 and k 1 = k 2 = k 3 = k 4 = 4 is the only possibility for n = 4 .
Case 2: n = 2
It implies that k 1 + k 2 = 6 , k 1 k 2 = 6 . So, k 1 , k 2 are the roots of the equation t 2 − 6 t + 6 = 0 but this equation has no integer solutions.So no solution in this case.
Case 3: n = 3
It implies that k 1 + k 2 + k 3 = 1 1 , k 1 1 + k 2 1 + k 3 1 = 1 . WLOG, we can assume that k 1 ≤ k 2 ≤ k 3 . Then doing case bashing, we will get that ( k 1 , k 2 , k 3 ) are ( 2 , 3 , 6 ) and its permutations.So, total number of solutions are 2 + 6 = 8