Algebra Busters

Algebra Level 5

Find the number of solutions to the system of equations:

{ k 1 + k 2 + k 3 + + k n = 5 n 4 1 k 1 + 1 k 2 + 1 k 3 + + 1 k n = 1 \begin{cases} k_1+k_2+k_3+ \dots +k_n=5n-4 \\ \dfrac 1{k_1}+\dfrac 1{k_2} + \dfrac 1{k_3}+ \dots +\dfrac 1{k_n}=1 \end{cases}

where k 1 , k 2 , k 3 . . . , k n k_1,k_2, k_3..., k_n , and n n are positive integers.


The answer is 8.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

3 solutions

Mohammed Imran
Mar 25, 2020

By Cauchy-Schwarz inequality, ( k 1 + k 2 + . . . + k n ) ( 1 k 1 + 1 k 2 + . . . + 1 k n ) n 2 (k_{1}+k_{2}+...+k_{n})(\frac{1}{k_{1}}+\frac{1}{k_{2}}+...+\frac{1}{k_{n}}) \geq n^2 so, we have 5 n 4 n 2 5n-4 \geq n^2 . So, we have ( n 1 ) ( n 4 ) 0 (n-1)(n-4) \leq 0 . This implies that 1 n 4 1 \leq n \leq 4 .Equality holds for n = 1 , 4 n=1,4 .From here, we will take 3 cases.

Case 1: n = 1 , 4 n=1,4 .

It implies that k 1 = 1 k_{1}=1 is the only possibility for n = 1 n=1 and k 1 = k 2 = k 3 = k 4 = 4 k_{1}=k_{2}=k_{3}=k_{4}=4 is the only possibility for n = 4 n=4 .

Case 2: n = 2 n=2

It implies that k 1 + k 2 = 6 , k 1 k 2 = 6 k_{1}+k_{2}=6, k_{1}k_{2}=6 . So, k 1 , k 2 k_{1}, k_{2} are the roots of the equation t 2 6 t + 6 = 0 t^2-6t+6=0 but this equation has no integer solutions.So no solution in this case.

Case 3: n = 3 n=3

It implies that k 1 + k 2 + k 3 = 11 , 1 k 1 + 1 k 2 + 1 k 3 = 1 k_{1}+k_{2}+k_{3}=11, \frac{1}{k_{1}}+\frac{1}{k_{2}}+\frac{1}{k_{3}}=1 . WLOG, we can assume that k 1 k 2 k 3 k_{1} \leq k_{2} \leq k_{3} . Then doing case bashing, we will get that ( k 1 , k 2 , k 3 ) (k_{1},k_{2},k_{3}) are ( 2 , 3 , 6 ) (2,3,6) and its permutations.So, total number of solutions are 2 + 6 = 8 2+6=\boxed 8

Great approach

Vijay Simha - 1 year, 2 months ago

Thank you very much !!!

Mohammed Imran - 1 year, 2 months ago

nice problem, similar to a Putnam problem i believe.(+1)

Aareyan Manzoor - 1 year, 2 months ago

Log in to reply

Oh really, I don't think so!!Thankyou!!!

Mohammed Imran - 1 year, 2 months ago

I did the same way, and got the same answers but I didn't take into account the permutations for n = 3 . :(

Nikola Alfredi - 1 year, 2 months ago

There is one mistake: First inequality is not because of Cauchy-Schwarz : But because Arithmetic mean of n numbers is greater than Harmonic mean on n numbers : AM >= HM.

Please correct that part.

Vijay Simha - 1 year, 2 months ago

Log in to reply

Hello Vijay! The first part can be done using Cauchy-Schwarz inequality as well. Please note that!!

Mohammed Imran - 1 year, 2 months ago
Mark Hennings
Mar 25, 2020

Consider the n n -dimensional vectors a , b \mathbf{a},\mathbf{b} where a j = k j b j = 1 k j 1 j n a_j \; = \; \sqrt{k_j} \hspace{1cm} b_j \; = \; \frac{1}{\sqrt{k_j}} \hspace{2cm} 1 \le j \le n Then a = 5 n 4 ||\mathbf{a}|| = \sqrt{5n-4} , b = 1 ||\mathbf{b}|| = 1 and a b = n \mathbf{a}\cdot\mathbf{b} = n . By the Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality, n 5 n 4 n \le \sqrt{5n-4} , which simplifies to read ( n 1 ) ( n 4 ) 0 (n-1)(n-4) \le 0 , so that 1 n 4 1 \le n \le 4 .

  • If n = 1 n=1 , we must have k 1 = 1 k_1=1 , leading the the singleton solution ( 1 ) (1) .
  • If n = 2 n=2 , the only solution of the equation k 1 1 + k 2 1 = 1 k_1^{-1} + k_2^{-1} = 1 is k 1 = k 2 = 2 k_1=k_2=2 , and 2 + 2 6 2 + 2 \neq 6 . There are no solutions in this case.
  • If n = 3 n=3 , suppose for definiteness that k 1 k 2 k 3 k_1 \le k_2 \le k_3 . If k 1 3 k_1 \ge 3 then we must have k 1 = k 2 = k 3 = 3 k_1=k_2=k_3=3 , but since 3 + 3 + 3 11 3+3+3 \neq 11 , this is not a solution. Thus we must have k 1 = 2 k_1=2 . The only solutions of k 2 1 + k 3 1 = 1 2 k_2^{-1} + k_3^{-1} = \tfrac12 with 2 k 2 k 3 2 \le k_2 \le k_3 are k 2 = k 3 = 4 k_2=k_3=4 and k 2 = 3 , k 3 = 6 k_2=3,k_3=6 . Only the second of these gives k 1 + k 2 + k 3 = 11 k_1+k_2+k_3=11 . Thus we have 6 more solutions: ( 2 , 3 , 6 ) , ( 2 , 6 , 3 ) , ( 3 , 2 , 6 ) , ( 3 , 6 , 2 ) , ( 6 , 2 , 3 ) , ( 6 , 3 , 2 ) (2,3,6),(2,6,3),(3,2,6),(3,6,2),(6,2,3),(6,3,2) .
  • If n = 4 n=4 , then the Cauchy=-Schwarz inequality at the start is an equality, so that a \mathbf{a} and b \mathbf{b} are proportional, and hence k 1 = k 2 = k 3 = k 4 k_1=k_2=k_3=k_4 . Thus the only solution in this case is ( 4 , 4 , 4 , 4 ) (4,4,4,4) .

Thus there are 1 + 6 + 1 = 8 1 + 6 + 1 = \boxed{8} solutions.

Nice solution sir

Mohammed Imran - 1 year, 2 months ago
Alapan Das
Mar 25, 2020

Combining two rows in the following manner we get ,

i = 1 n K i = 5 n 4 \sum_{i=1}^{n} K_i= 5n-4 ........(a)

i = 1 n ( 5 2 ) 2 1 K i = 25 4 \sum_{i=1}^{n} (\frac{5}{2})^2\frac{1}{K_i} = \frac{25}{4} ....(b)

Subtracting (b) from (a) and subtracting 5 n 5n from both sides of the new equation of (a)-(b) we get the following equation...

i = 1 n ( K i 2 5 2 + ( 2.5 ) 2 K i ) = 25 4 4 = 2.25 \sum_{i=1}^{n} ({K_i} - 2*\frac{5}{2} + \frac{(2.5)^2}{K_i}) = \frac{25}{4} -4 = 2.25

i = 1 n ( K i 2.5 K i ) 2 = 2.25 \sum_{i=1}^{n}(\sqrt{K_i}-\frac{2.5}{\sqrt{K_i}})^2 = 2.25 .........(1) And say, A i = ( K i 2.5 K i ) 2 A_i= (\sqrt{K_i}-\frac{2.5}{\sqrt{K_i}})^2 .

A 1 = 2.25 , A 2 = 0.125 , A 3 = 0.083333.... , A 4 = 0.5625 , A 5 = 1.25 , A 6 = 2.0416668 A_1=2.25 , A_2= 0.125 , A_3 =0.083333.... , A_4 =0.5625 , A_5 = 1.25, A_6 = 2.0416668 and A K > 2.25 A_K > 2.25 for all K 7 K\geq 7 .

Now, we shall find the maximum how many times one natural number can be there in the solution tuple. Number of permitted appearance of some integer , n ( K ) n(K) is as below

Upper bounds of K from (1) \textbf {Upper bounds of K from (1)}

{ n ( 2 ) 18 , n ( 3 ) 27 , n ( 4 ) 4 , n ( 5 ) 1 , n ( 6 ) 1 , n ( k ) = 0 n(2)\leq{18} , n(3)\leq{27} ,n(4)\leq{4} ,n(5)\leq {1} , n(6)\leq{1} ,n(k)=0 for all k 7 k\geq{7} }

Upper bounf of k from "the reciprocal equation " \textbf {Upper bounf of k from "the reciprocal equation}"

{ n ( 2 ) 2 , n ( 3 ) 3 , n ( 4 ) ( 4 ) , n ( 5 ) ( 5 ) , n ( 6 ) ( 6 ) , . . . . n(2)\leq{2} , n(3)\leq{3} , n(4)\leq(4) ,n(5)\leq(5), n(6)\leq(6) ,.... }

And from both of these, we get { n ( 2 ) 2 , n ( 3 ) 3 , n ( 4 ) ( 4 ) , n ( 5 ) ( 1 ) , n ( 6 ) ( 1 ) , n ( k 7 ) = 0 n(2)\leq{2} , n(3)\leq{3} , n(4)\leq(4) ,n(5)\leq(1), n(6)\leq(1), n(k\geq7)=0 }...(2). But 5 5 is of no use because it needs other multiples of 5 5 to satisfy the reciprocal equation.

So, K i K_i can only be 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 6 1,2,3,4,6 . And from (2) we get 1 n K i 2 2 + 3 3 + 4 4 + 6 = 35 n 7 \sum_{1}^{n} K_i \leq 2*2+3*3+4*4+6={35} \Rightarrow n\leq7 .

And from this little field we can easily find that the solutions exist for n = 1 , n = 3 , n = 4 n=1, n=3, n=4 and these are {( 1 1 )} ; { ( 2 , 3 , 6 ) (2,3,6) having 6 6 permutations} ; { ( 4 , 4 , 4 , 4 ) (4,4,4,4) }. So, there are total 8 solutions.

Note : For n = 5 , 6 , 7 n=5,6,7 we need terms like 4 , 6 4,6 more than their available quantity and more 2 , 3 2,3 to make the sum equal to 5 n 4 5n-4 , but we can't use all the available 2 , 3 2,3 because make the reciprocal sum more than 1 1 , and overall there is a critical situation. So, n n can be only 1 , 3 , 4 1,3,4 .

Can you please mention which 2 rows in which following manner and how you got to the first step and all this

Mohammed Imran - 1 year, 2 months ago

Log in to reply

ok i am editing fro clearence.

Alapan Das - 1 year, 2 months ago

Ok, I have edited this and made this clear.

Alapan Das - 1 year, 2 months ago

but where is the start of first step?

Mohammed Imran - 1 year, 2 months ago

WOW. Now It is an awesome solution

Mohammed Imran - 1 year, 2 months ago

Bounding is a good way to go isn't it?

Mohammed Imran - 1 year, 2 months ago

Log in to reply

Yes. Bounding makes the world easier.

Alapan Das - 1 year, 2 months ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...