∫ 0 ∞ sin ( x n ) d x
For all positive rationals, n > 1 , I n denotes the integral as above.
If P n denotes the product, r = 1 ∏ n − 1 I ( r n ) , then evaluate the following limit L .
L = n → ∞ lim ( n P n ) n 1
Enter the value of ⌊ 1 0 0 0 L ⌋ .
Details and Assumptions:
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Great answer, Jon.
You could have taken l n both sides of the limit and then the product simplifies into an easy Riemann sum.
Solving the integral 0 ∫ ∞ sin ( x n ) d x = sin ( 2 n π ) γ ( n n + 1 )
Given P n = ∏ r = 1 n − 1 I ( r n )
Solving the limit:
Let y = lim n → ∞ ( n P n ) 1 / n
l o g ( y ) = lim n → ∞ n 1 l o g n P n
l o g ( y ) = lim n → ∞ n l o g n + lim n → ∞ n 1 ∑ r = 1 n − 1 l o g ( sin ( 2 n π r ) γ ( 1 + n r )
l o g ( y ) = ∫ 0 1 l o g ( sin ( 2 π x ) γ ( 1 + x ) ) d x
I get
l o g ( y ) = − 0 . 7 7 4 2 0 8 6
y = 0 . 4 6 1 0 6 8
1 0 0 0 y = 4 6 1 . 0 6 8
The greatest integer value is 4 6 1 , which is the required answer.
I think you need to check your integration. I get l o g ( y ) = ∫ 0 1 l o g ( s i n ( 2 π x ) Γ ( 1 + x ) ) d x = l o g ( e 2 π ) ≈ − 0 . 7 7 4 2 0 8 6 4 7 3 5 5 2 7 3
Log in to reply
I got the same answer as you (461). I also worked out a case to check and found it was below the answer while the limit is approached from above...
Could another person who solved the problem explain why 652 is the answer?
Could U tell me how U got this answer ?
@D G you know I also made the same mistake! You should see that you take the antilogarithms after getting the limit
Can U tell me how U integrated ∫ 0 1 l o g ( s i n ( 2 π x ) Γ ( 1 + x ) ) d x ?
This is actually not a bad way to work this out. But unfortunately, even when using your approach, y works out to 0 . 4 6 1 0 6 8 5 . . . , not 0 . 6 5 2 0 4 9 . . . , and so the correct answer is still 4 6 1 .
What I'd like to know, how did 8 other solvers come up with the exact same erroneous answer 0 . 6 5 2 0 4 9 . . . ?
I will share my solution on how
∫ 0 ∞ s i n ( x n ) d x = s i n ( 2 n π ) Γ ( n n + 1 )
Okay, let's start.
First of all, we must notice some things that since,
s i n ( x ) = k = 0 ∑ ∞ ( 2 k + 1 ) ! ( − 1 ) k x 2 k + 1
Then, x s i n ( x ) = k = 0 ∑ ∞ ( 2 k + 1 ) ! ( − x ) k = k = 0 ∑ ∞ Γ ( 2 k + 2 ) Γ ( k + 1 ) k ! ( − x ) k
Well, that is the exponential generating function and it might be obvious now that I will use Ramanujan Master Theorem.
∫ 0 ∞ s i n ( x n ) d x = 2 n 1 ∫ 0 ∞ u s i n ( u ) u 2 n n + 1 − 1 d u [As we substitute u = x n ]
= 2 n 1 M ( u s i n ( u ) ; 2 n n + 1 ) where M ( f ; a n ) means Mellin Transform of f at a n .
Now, using Ramanujan Master Theorem,
= 2 n 1 Γ ( 2 n n + 1 ) Γ ( 2 − 2 2 n n + 1 ) Γ ( 1 − 2 n n + 1 )
= 2 n 1 s i n ( 2 n π ( n + 1 ) ) π Γ ( n n − 1 ) 1
= 2 n 1 c o s ( 2 n π ) π π Γ ( n 1 ) s i n ( n π )
= n Γ ( n 1 ) s i n ( 2 n π )
Using basic definition of Gamma function (factorial),
= Γ ( n n + 1 ) s i n ( 2 n π )
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
An outline that shows the main steps: We have that ∫ 0 ∞ sin ( x n ) d x = sin ( 2 n π ) Γ ( n n + 1 ) . (For example, see http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/453811/integral-of-int-limits-0-infty-frac-sin-xn-xndx .) Then r = 1 ∏ n − 1 I n / r = r = 1 ∏ n − 1 sin 2 n π r ⋅ r = 1 ∏ n − 1 Γ ( n n + r ) .
It can be shown that r = 1 ∏ n − 1 sin 2 n π r = 2 n − 1 n and r = 1 ∏ n − 1 Γ ( n n + r ) = ( 2 π ) ( n − 1 ) / 2 ⋅ n 1 / 2 − n ⋅ ( n − 1 ) ! , so L = n → ∞ lim ( 2 n − 1 n ⋅ ( 2 π ) ( n − 1 ) / 2 ⋅ n 1 / 2 − n ⋅ ( n − 1 ) ! ) 1 / n . This works out to L = 2 e 2 π .