A number theory problem by Andrea Palma

How many divisors does the number 56 have?


The answer is 8.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

2 solutions

Andrea Palma
Feb 22, 2016

Using prime factorisation we have 56 = 2 3 7 56 = 2^3\cdot 7 . The exponents of the two primes that concur in the factorisation are 3 3 and 1 1 . So the number 56 56 has ( 3 + 1 ) ( 1 + 1 ) = 4 2 = 8 (3+1)\cdot (1 + 1) = 4 \cdot 2 = 8 divisors.

@Andrea Palma , also give the proof of this solution..??

sanyam goel - 5 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

Sure, I'll do my best! If you have a prime factorisation of a number, then is VERY easy to say how many divisor the number has. For istance 8 = 2 3 8 = 2^3 has 4 4 divisors, namely 1 , 2 , 4 , 8 1,2,4,8 . Note that the exponent of the factorisation in primes of 8 8 is 3 3 . You just have to increase this exponent by 1 1 . 3 + 1 = 4 3+1 = 4

This rule yelds for any power of prime. If n = p k n = p^k , p p prime, then the number of divisors is k + 1 k+1 . In fact the divisors of n n are 1 = p 0 , p = p 1 , p 2 , , p k 1=p^0, p=p^1, p^2, \ldots, p^k .

What happens when the number n n has a factorisation like n = p k q h n= p^k q^h with p , q p,q distinct primes? We have these all these divisors p a q b p^aq^b where a { 0 , 1 , , k } a \in \{0,1, \ldots, k\} and b { 0 , 1 , , h } b \in \{0,1, \ldots , h\} . So we have a divisor of n n for every couple ( a , b (a,b ) living in the cartesian product { 0 , 1 , , k } × { 0 , 1 , , h } \{ 0,1, \ldots, k\} \times \{0,1, \ldots , h\} that has ( k + 1 ) ( h + 1 ) (k+1) (h+1) elements.

Now we can generalize this procedure. Let n = p 1 k 1 p 2 k 2 p t k t n = p_1^{k_1}p_2^{k_2}\cdot \cdots \cdot p_t^{k_t} with p 1 , , p t p_1, \ldots , p_t pairwise distinct primes. We have a divisor of n n everytime we have a number like p 1 a 1 p 2 a 2 p t a t n p_1^{a_1}p_2^{a_2}\cdot \cdots \cdot p_t^{a_t} n with a i k i a_i \leq k_i .

So we have a different divisor (we are using the uniqueness of the prime factorisation) everytime we have a t t- -uple ( a 1 , a 2 , , a t ) (a_1, a_2, \ldots, a_t) living in the cartesian product

{ 0 , 1 , , k 1 } × { 0 , 1 , , k 2 } × × { 0 , 1 , , k t } \{0,1,\ldots , k_1\} \times \{0,1,\ldots , k_2 \} \times \cdots \times \{ 0,1,\ldots , k_t \}

that has exactly ( k 1 + 1 ) ( k 2 + 1 ) ( k t + 1 (k_1+1) \cdot (k_2 + 1) \cdot \cdots \cdot (k_t + 1 ) elements. So the latter is also the number of divisors of n n .

Andrea Palma - 5 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

Very nicely explained !

Anurag Pandey - 4 years, 10 months ago
Munem Shahriar
Sep 4, 2017

Divisors of 56 are 1, 2, 4, 7, 8, 14, 28, 56.

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...