Let a , b , and c be non-negative real numbers which satisfy a 2 + 1 1 + b 2 + 1 1 + c 2 + 1 1 = 2 . Find the maximum value of a b + b c + c a .
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Another way of using Titu's lemma. First, we change the condition into a 2 + 1 a 2 + b 2 + 1 b 2 + c 2 + 1 c 2 = 1 Then we have 1 = a 2 + 1 a 2 + b 2 + 1 b 2 + c 2 + 1 c 2 ≥ T i t u ′ s L e m m a a 2 + b 2 + c 2 + 3 ( a + b + c ) 2 ⇔ a 2 + b 2 + c 2 + 3 ≥ a 2 + b 2 + c 2 + 2 ( a b + b c + c a ) ∴ a b + b c + c a ≤ 2 3 The equality holds when a = b = c = 2 1
Exactly the same solution..!!
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
[It's late so I might be wrong with my signs. Please verify and see if this is correct.]
Cross multiplying the terms and simplifying, we obtain 2 a 2 b 2 c 2 = 1 − a 2 b 2 − b 2 c 2 − c 2 a 2 .
We will apply titu's lemma creatively, and force the a b + b c + c a term to appear on the "correct" side:
2 = a 2 b 2 c 2 + b 2 c 2 b 2 c 2 + a 2 b 2 c 2 + c 2 a 2 c 2 a 2 + a 2 b 2 c 2 + a 2 b 2 a 2 b 2 ≥ 3 a 2 b 2 c 2 + b 2 c 2 + c 2 a 2 + a 2 b 2 ( b c + c a + a b ) 2
Cross multiplying, we get
6 a 2 b 2 c 2 + 2 ( b 2 c 2 + c 2 a 2 + a 2 b 2 ) ≥ ( a b + b c + c a ) 2
Now, substituting in 2 a 2 b 2 c 2 = 1 − a 2 b 2 − b 2 c 2 − c 2 a 2 , we get
3 ≥ ( a b + b c + c a ) 2 + a 2 b 2 + b 2 c 2 + c 2 a 2
Finally, since a 2 b 2 + b 2 c 2 + c 2 a 2 ≥ 3 1 ( a b + b c + c a ) 2 , we can conclude that
3 ≥ 3 4 ( a b + b c + c a ) 2 ⇒ 2 3 ≥ ( a b + b c + c a )
Note: Almost every inequality that we apply naively gives the wrong direction. IE It is true that a 2 + b 2 + c 2 ≥ 2 3 and a + b + c ≥ 2 3 2 , but clearly neither of that will help us to maximize a b + b c + c a .
My initial path for this solution originally focused on a 1 + b 1 + c 1 = a b c a b + b c + c a , which is what led me to looking at ( a 1 ) 2 + 1 ( a 1 ) 2 , which then led to a 2 b 2 c 2 + b 2 c 2 b 2 c 2 .