Modulus+Logs+Circles+Vectors!

Calculus Level 5

Let k 1 , k 2 k_1, k_2 be any two integers given in the relation ( n a ) ! t + t ( n b ) ! + a + b k 1 n k 2 0 |(n-a)!-t| + |t-(n-b)!| + | a+b-k_1n-k_2| \leq 0 n \forall n such that a < b n a < b \leq n and a , b , n , t N a,b,n,t \in N .

Let P , Q P , Q be any two points on the curve

y = log 1 2 ( x + k 2 2 ) + log 2 4 x 2 + 4 k 2 x + ( k 1 + k 2 ) y = \log_{\frac{1}{2}} \left({x + \dfrac{k_2}{2}}\right) + \log_2 \sqrt{4x^2 + 4k_2x +(k_1 + k_2)} .

Also P P lies on the circle x 2 + y 2 = k 1 3 2 k 2 x^2 + y^2 = k_1^3 - 2k_2 and Q Q lies inside the given circle such that its abscissa is a non-zero integer.

O is the centre of the circle.

1) Find the minimum possible value of O P O Q \vec{OP} \cdot \vec{OQ} .

2) The maximum length of PQ

2 ; 3 2 ; 3 4 ; 2 4 ; 2 0 ; 3 0 ; 3 2 ; 4 2 ; 4 3 ; 1 3 ; 1

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

1 solution

Nishant Rai
Apr 26, 2015

@Nishant Rai The solution has made so many assumptions!! If Q Q has it's abscissa as integer, then why not on the negative X a x i s X-axis , namely ( 2 , 1 ) (-2,1) and ( 1 , 1 ) (-1,1) , as they are integers as well. That will give the value of O P . O Q OP.OQ as negative. Please check this.

Secondly, in your question, what do you mean by length of O P . O Q OP.OQ . That is the scalar product and how do you define the length of a scalar. It would be good if you could change that.

Thirdly, due to the anomaly mentioned in the first point, the value of length of P Q PQ also changes. It comes out to be 5 as maximum, i.e. between P = ( 3 , 1 ) P = (3,1) and Q = ( 2 , 1 ) Q = (-2,1) .

Thanks! :)

A Former Brilliant Member - 5 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

No, the x x coordinate of P P and Q Q must be x > 1 / 2 x > 1/2 , so that the l o g log functions are well-defined. Notice that the question simply uses l o g log and not l o g |log| .

However I agree on the 'length' aspect. He should change that.

Adwait Godbole - 5 years, 2 months ago

Log in to reply

Can you please try the problem named 'spicy 1'?It is a tough question on definite integrals. If you are able to solve it please give me an outline of the procedures.Please do reply here.

Manish Maharaj - 5 years, 2 months ago

Oh ok! Thanks! I kinda solved it by taking Mod in my copy!

A Former Brilliant Member - 5 years, 2 months ago

Which is this book @Nishant Rai

Arpit Kharbanda - 3 years, 9 months ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...