A calculus problem by Rahil Sehgal

Calculus Level 4

a n = n 2 500 + 3 n 3 \large a_n = \dfrac{n^2}{500+3n^3}

The sequence { a n } \left \{a_n\right \} is defined as above ( n N n \in \mathbb N ). Find the n n when a n a_n is the largest.


For more problems try my new set


The answer is 7.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

2 solutions

a n a_{n} will be maximized when 1 a n = 500 n 2 + 3 n \dfrac{1}{a_{n}} = \dfrac{500}{n^{2}} + 3n is minimized. Now by the AM-GM inequality we have that

500 n 2 + 3 n = 500 n 2 + 3 n 2 + 3 n 2 3 500 n 2 × ( 3 n 2 ) 2 3 = 9 2 500 3 \dfrac{500}{n^{2}} + 3n = \dfrac{500}{n^{2}} + \dfrac{3n}{2} + \dfrac{3n}{2} \ge 3\sqrt[3]{\dfrac{500}{n^{2}} \times \left(\dfrac{3n}{2}\right)^{2}} = \dfrac{9}{2}\sqrt[3]{500} ,

with equality holding when 500 n 2 = 3 n 2 n = 1000 3 3 6.9336 \dfrac{500}{n^{2}} = \dfrac{3n}{2} \Longrightarrow n = \sqrt[3]{\dfrac{1000}{3}} \approx 6.9336 .

Now the closest integer value is 7 7 , but to confirm that this is the solution we need to check that a 6 a_{6} and a 8 a_{8} are less than a 7 a_{7} , which indeed they are. Thus the answer in 7 \boxed{7} .

Comment: We could also use calculus. Taking n = x n = x as a continuous variable, we have that

a ( x ) = 2 x ( 500 + 3 x 3 ) x 2 ( 9 x 2 ) ( 500 + 3 x 3 ) 2 = 0 a'(x) = \dfrac{2x(500 + 3x^{3}) - x^{2}(9x^{2})}{(500 + 3x^{3})^{2}} = 0 when x = 0 x = 0 or 1000 = 3 x 3 x = 1000 3 3 1000 = 3x^{3} \Longrightarrow x = \sqrt[3]{\dfrac{1000}{3}} ,

which is consistent with our previous result.

How could you chose 7 only.Since the point of maxima is non integer so to chose between 6 and 7 you must compare the rate of decrease on both sides of the curve.

Mayank Jha - 4 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

True, which is why I had the note about checking n = 6 , 7 , 8 n = 6,7,8 to confirm that the closest integer to 6.9336... 6.9336... does provide the maximum. I've edited my solution to mention this more directly.

Brian Charlesworth - 4 years, 1 month ago

Differentiating the reciprocal is much simpler than determining the first derivative of the original expression (can be done without the quotient rule).

Also (for the sake of completeness) we have to show that the stationary point is a maximum (or minimum when using the reciprocal).

Zee Ell - 4 years, 1 month ago
Swapnil Vatsal
Jun 2, 2017

Not a solution but i found this in Fiitjee RSM. IIT aspirants may know this

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...