Satellite Speed

Consider a satellite that is revolving around the Earth at a fixed height. As it moves to a lower orbit, what will happen to its speed?

It will increase It will remain the same It will decrease None of these choices

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

4 solutions

Rajdeep Dhingra
Apr 13, 2016

Relevant wiki: Gravitation

An object moving in circular motion will need a force towards center i.e centripetal force. Here it is being provided by gravity. m v 2 r = G M m r 2 \dfrac{mv^2}{r} = GM\dfrac{m}{r^2}
On solving this we get v 1 r v \propto \dfrac{1}{\sqrt{r}}
This means To maintain a constant height at a lower orbit, a higher speed is needed \color{#D61F06}{\text{To maintain a constant height at a lower orbit, a higher speed is needed}}
Hence answer is 'It will increase'.

Moderator note:

More accurately, the statement should be "To maintain a constant height at a lower orbit, a higher speed is needed".

It is not true that "Moving the satellite close will increase the speed of the satellite".

Thank you for correcting me. I have edited the solution.

Rajdeep Dhingra - 5 years, 1 month ago
Sravanth C.
Apr 13, 2016

We know that the velocity of a spacecraft at a radius r r from the earth and the mass of earth being M E M_E is given by the expression:

v = G M E r v=\sqrt{G\dfrac{M_E}{r}}

Now, let us say that the spacecraft was initially orbiting at a radius r 1 r_1 with a velocity of v 1 v_1 and it moves to a lower orbit of radius r 2 r_2 and changes the velocity to v 2 v_2 . We will compute the change in velocity as the spacecraft moves from r 1 r_1 to r 2 r_2 :

Δ v = v 2 v 1 = G M E r 2 G M E r 1 = G M E ( 1 r 2 1 r 1 ) = G M E ( r 1 r 2 r 1 r 2 ) \begin{aligned} \Delta v &= v_2-v_1\\ &= \sqrt{G\dfrac{M_E}{r_2}}-\sqrt{G\dfrac{M_E}{r_1}}\\ &=\sqrt{GM_E\left(\dfrac{1}{r_2}-\dfrac{1}{r_1}\right)}\\ &=\sqrt{GM_E\left(\dfrac{r_1-r_2}{r_1r_2}\right)}\\ \end{aligned}

Thus we can observe that there is a positive change in the velocity of the spacecraft, which means that the velocity increases.

Moderator note:

Good clear explanation.

I think you had some latexing error, and typed the 'G' outside of the root.

A Former Brilliant Member - 5 years, 2 months ago

Log in to reply

Oops! thanks, edited.

Sravanth C. - 5 years, 2 months ago
展豪 張
Apr 15, 2016

Consider the total mechanical energy in the process,
as there is no external forces,
Kinetic Energy + Gravtional Potential Energy is a constant.
Moving to a lower orbit is a drop in GPE, so KE increases.
KE increases means speed increases.

Hm, how do you know that the satellite didn't have to expand energy to move?

Calvin Lin Staff - 5 years, 2 months ago

Log in to reply

Hmmm... if it expands energy to move, it will further increases its KE? (I'm not sure)

展豪 張 - 5 years, 1 month ago

Kepler's Third Law states that the two orbits compare as r 3 T 2 = const . \frac{r^3}{T^2} = \text{const}. With v r / T v \propto r/T , this becomes r v 2 = const , r\cdot v^2 = \text{const}, so that v 1 r . v \propto \frac 1{\sqrt r}. Smaller orbits will require higher speeds.

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...