An easy one

Algebra Level 2

Which one of the following is correct??

where i 2 = 1 i^{2}=-1

8 7 i > 7 + 8 i 8-7i>7+8i 6 + i > 6 i 6+i>6-i 6 + 5 i < 6 5 i 6+5i<6-5i None

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

3 solutions

Tanishq Varshney
May 12, 2015

Complex numbers with non zero imaginary part can never be compared.

What about 2 > 1 2>1 ?

Both 1 1 and 2 2 are complex numbers but they can be compared. You must mention that complex numbers with imaginary part 0 0 can be compared.

Abhishek Sharma - 6 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

@Abhishek Sharma actually u might be saying that complex number with real part zero cannot be compared

Tanishq Varshney - 6 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

Sorry there was a typo, now I have edited my comment.

Abhishek Sharma - 6 years, 1 month ago
Swapnil Das
May 12, 2015

All of the given numbers were complex in nature, and c o m p l e x complex numbers can never be compared.

yup correct ¨ \ddot \smile

Tanishq Varshney - 6 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

Upvote if u like and thank U for commenting!

Swapnil Das - 6 years, 1 month ago
Stewart Gordon
May 17, 2015

It's simple to prove that it is impossible to define a total ordering of the complex numbers that satisfies all the properties of the ordering of the reals. The properties as I was taught them are:

  • For any x x and y y , exactly one of these is true: x < y x < y , x = y x = y , y < x y < x .
  • If x < y x < y and y < z y < z , then x < z x < z .
  • If x < y x < y then x + a < y + a x + a < y + a .
  • If x < y x < y and 0 < a 0 < a , then a x < a y ax < ay .
  • 0 1 0 \neq 1 .

From these it can be proven that

  • 0 < 1 0 < 1 .
  • If x < y x < y then y < x -y < -x .
  • If x < y x < y and a < 0 a < 0 , then a y < a x ay < ax .

Now suppose there is a total ordering of the complex numbers that meets this property. Then either

  • 0 < i 0 < i , in which case multiplying through by i i gives 0 < 1 0 < -1 .
  • 0 = i 0 = i , in which case squaring both sides of the equation gives 0 = 1 0 = -1 .
  • i < 0 i < 0 , in which case multiplying through by i i again gives 0 < 1 0 < -1 .

each of which is nonsense.

It is, however, possible to define a partial ordering of the complex numbers that is an extension of that of the reals and satisfies all of the properties except for the total ordering one. If ( z ) = ( w ) \Im(z) = \Im(w) , then the numbers are ordered according to their real parts. Otherwise, neither z < w z < w nor z > w z > w . I have previously proven that it impossible even to define it even for some z z and w w with different imaginary parts without losing another of the properties.

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...