Which one of the following is correct??
where i 2 = − 1
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
What about 2 > 1 ?
Both 1 and 2 are complex numbers but they can be compared. You must mention that complex numbers with imaginary part 0 can be compared.
Log in to reply
@Abhishek Sharma actually u might be saying that complex number with real part zero cannot be compared
Log in to reply
Sorry there was a typo, now I have edited my comment.
All of the given numbers were complex in nature, and c o m p l e x numbers can never be compared.
yup correct ⌣ ¨
It's simple to prove that it is impossible to define a total ordering of the complex numbers that satisfies all the properties of the ordering of the reals. The properties as I was taught them are:
From these it can be proven that
Now suppose there is a total ordering of the complex numbers that meets this property. Then either
each of which is nonsense.
It is, however, possible to define a partial ordering of the complex numbers that is an extension of that of the reals and satisfies all of the properties except for the total ordering one. If ℑ ( z ) = ℑ ( w ) , then the numbers are ordered according to their real parts. Otherwise, neither z < w nor z > w . I have previously proven that it impossible even to define it even for some z and w with different imaginary parts without losing another of the properties.
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Complex numbers with non zero imaginary part can never be compared.