x ⌊ x ⌋ 0 . 1 0 0 . 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 1 0
By looking at the table above, is it true that as
x
approaches 0, then
⌊
x
⌋
approaches 0 as well?
That is, is
x
→
0
lim
⌊
x
⌋
=
0
correct?
Notation : ⌊ ⋅ ⌋ denotes the floor function .
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Don't agree - by looking at the table (as ordered) it IS correct ( even if it's not correct in R). And note: the domain of definition isn't stated.
Log in to reply
Yeah, but the limit says as x approaches 0, that is from both sides. For the two sided limit to exist, it must be the case that both one sided limits are equal!
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Relevant wiki: Floor Function
While this table is true:
x ⌊ x ⌋ 0 . 1 0 0 . 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 1 0
This table is true as well:
x ⌊ x ⌋ − 0 . 1 − 1 − 0 . 0 1 − 1 − 0 . 0 0 1 − 1 − 0 . 0 0 0 1 − 1 − 0 . 0 0 0 0 1 − 1
In essence, the function does not approach the same limit from both sides.
This is why the limit does not exist.