There exist three distinct rational numbers , , and such that is also rational. At least how many of , , and have to be rational?
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Relevant wiki: Rational Numbers
Let’s suppose c is rational and the other two are not. Then let the sum of the other two equals a rational number d , so that we have
a + b = d
or, re-arranging, we have
2 d b = d 2 + b − a
which implies that b is rational, which is a contradiction.
Let’s suppose all are irrational, and let their sum be a rational number d , so that we have
a + b = d − c
Squaring both sides gets us
a + 2 a b + b = d 2 − 2 d c + d
which implies that the following is rational
a b + c d 2
But as we’ve seen above, this leads to a contradiction.
Being that just one of them being irrational is a trivial case that won’t work, we conclude that all 3 of the terms have to be rational.
Note: By induction, we [ought to maybe be able to] extend this argument to show that the sum of any number of irrational square roots cannot be rational.