x 3 + 1 2 x − 1 2 = 0
Find real root of this equation above. Give your answer the two decimal places.
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Match the equation with the identity ( u + v ) 3 − 3 u v ( u + v ) − ( u 3 + v 3 ) .We get the following system of equations: ⎩ ⎪ ⎨ ⎪ ⎧ u + v = x − 3 u v = 1 2 → u v = − 4 u 3 + v 3 = 1 2 Cube the second equation to get u 3 v 3 = − 6 4 .Make an equation in a variable z having roots u 3 , v 3 : ( z − u 3 ) ( z − v 3 ) = z 2 − ( u 3 + v 3 ) z + ( u 3 v 3 ) = z 2 − 1 2 x − 6 4 = 0 This has roots 16 and -4 so u 3 = 1 6 → u = 2 3 2 v 3 = − 4 → v = 3 − 4 .So x = u + v = 2 3 2 + 3 − 4 which is 0 . 9 3 to 2 decimal places.
This solution is incomplete because you have only shown that there exist a root but failed to show that it's the only root.
Yes, after many infructuous tries, I put it on wolfram. How are we supposed to know it?
This solution has been marked wrong for not showing any relevant working.
Newton-Raphson Method, I guess?
Woops, never heard of that, my fault.
You may check Cardano's method and Newton's meehod from here
But the better is cardano one
Given that this is a depressed cubic, we can use the Cardano method. Of course, it doesn't offer you a way to calculate the exact value.
You may check Cardano's method from here
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Since we only require two decimal places (which is very little), Intermediate Value Theorem is preferred. While Cardano's Method looks messy and Newton Raphson Method requires a background in calculus and plenty of tedious work.
Let f ( x ) = x 3 + 1 2 x − 1 2 . Because f ( 0 ) < 0 , f ( 1 ) > 0 , the root is in between 0 and 1 exclusive.
f ( 0 . 5 ) < 0 , f ( 0 . 7 ) < 0 , f ( 0 . 9 ) < 0 , f ( 0 . 9 5 ) > 0 , f ( 0 . 9 3 ) < 0 , f ( 0 . 9 4 ) > 0 , f ( 0 . 9 3 5 ) > 0
Since f ( 0 . 9 3 ) < 0 < f ( 0 . 9 3 5 ) , the root of the equation x 3 + 1 2 x − 1 2 = 0 is equals to 0 . 9 3 to 2 decimal places.
And suppose there is another root, by fermat's theorem, there exist a point c such that f ′ ( c ) = 0 but since f ′ ( x ) = 3 x 2 + 1 2 > 0 for all x , there can't be any more roots.