x 4 − 8 x 3 + 2 4 x 2 + b x + c = 0 has 4 real and positive roots.
Then find the value of b
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
I hope this is what @Calvin Lin sir expected as a proof. @Chew-Seong Cheong note this. You can't directly say b = − 3 2 from your proof.
Log in to reply
Yes, but then it requires the equation to have 4 real and positive roots.
However, all that is stated is that the equation has "(at least one) real and positive roots". With this constraint, it is possible for the equation to have 2 real and positive roots, and 2 complex roots. Hence the report that I filed.
Thanks. I actually only learn inequalities after joining Brilliant still very rusty with it.
You got the actual reason. Congratulation!
This problem can also be done with the help of Calculus, here's how:
Since the given equation has 4 real roots, f ′ ( x ) will have 3 real roots and f ′ ′ ( x ) will have 2 real roots :
f ′ ( x ) = 4 x 3 − 2 4 x 2 + 4 8 x + b
f ′ ′ ( x ) = 1 2 x 2 − 4 8 x + 4 8
The roots of f ′ ′ ( x ) comes out to be 2 . Now putting 2 in f ′ ( x ) = 0 we get b = − 3 2 .
Can I ask you something? A similar answer has been posted here...
The intuition is right.
Let f ( x ) = x 4 − 8 x 3 + 2 4 x 2 + b x + c . Then f ′ ( x ) = 4 x 3 − 2 4 x 2 + 4 8 x + b and f ′ ′ ( x ) = 1 2 x 2 − 4 8 x + 4 8 . Factoring the latter, we obtain f ′ ′ ( x ) = 1 2 ( x − 2 ) 2 . Therefore f ′ ′ ( x ) ≥ 0 for all x , and then the function f ′ ( x ) is always increasing on ( − ∞ , ∞ ) . Thus f ′ ( x ) can have only one real solution.
Now we have to prove that if f ′ ( x ) has only one real root and f ( x ) has only real roots, then there will be a real number c such that f ( x ) = ( x − c ) 4 . That is, f ( x ) will has only one real solution of multiplicity 4.
Let us prove it by contradiction. Assume that f ( x ) has more than one real solution. Of course, the number of real roots cannot be 4 or 3, because using the Rolle's Theorem this would imply that f ′ ( x ) would have more than one real root. The other possibility is that f ( x ) had 2 different real roots, let us say α and β . In this case at least one these two roots would have multiplicity greater than one, let us say α . But this would imply that f ′ ( x ) would have two different real roots: one of them would be α and the other one, according to Rolle's Theorem, would be a number in between α and β . This contradiction proves that f ( x ) has a unique real root and as it does not have complex roots, the given unique real root would have multiplicity 4. Then f ( x ) = ( x − c ) 4 . By expanding the binomial and making it equal to the given polynomial, we obtain that c = 2 . Then from the expansion of ( x − 2 ) 4 , we get that the value of b would be -32.
But in this solution I never used the fact that the roots are positive numbers. I used only the fact that the polynomial does not have complex non-real roots. Did I miss something?
x 4 − 8 x 3 + 2 4 x 2 + b x + c = 0
⇒ x 2 − 8 x + 2 4 + x b + x 2 c = 0
⇒ ( x 2 − 2 c + x 2 c ) + 2 c − 8 ( x − 8 x b ) + 2 4 = 0
⇒ ( x − x c ) 2 − 8 ( x − 8 x b ) + 2 4 + 2 c = 0
Equating c = 8 b ⇒ x − x c = x − 8 x b = y
Then the equation has real roots when:
8 2 − 4 ( 2 4 + 2 c ) ≥ 0 ⇒ 6 4 − 9 6 − 8 × 8 b ≥ 0
⇒ y 2 − 8 y + 2 4 + 2 c = 0 ⇒ − 3 2 − b ≥ 0
⇒ b ≤ − 3 2
This does not explain why b = − 3 3 cannot be the answer.
Log in to reply
Thanks for the comment. I think only b = 3 2 gives a real root of x = 2 . Get back to it after breakfast. The wife is calling already.
c^(1/2) = b/8
Looking at the graph for some values of b and c, the graph is shaped like a parabola only. How ever we have four real roots. This would be only possible if the graph touches Y=0. This points to four equal roots.
S
o
f
(
X
)
=
(
X
+
a
)
4
.
S
i
n
c
e
t
h
e
r
e
i
s
a
−
t
i
v
e
c
o
e
f
f
i
c
i
e
n
t
o
f
X
3
t
e
r
m
,
a
<
0
.
F
o
r
m
>
0
,
(
X
−
m
)
4
=
X
4
−
4
∗
m
∗
X
3
+
6
∗
m
2
∗
X
2
−
4
∗
m
3
∗
X
+
m
4
.
C
o
m
p
a
r
i
n
g
t
h
e
c
o
e
f
f
i
c
i
e
n
t
s
o
f
X
3
t
e
r
m
s
w
i
t
h
g
i
v
e
n
e
q
a
t
i
o
n
w
e
g
e
t
m
=
2
.
C
o
e
f
f
i
c
i
e
n
t
s
o
f
X
2
t
e
r
m
s
c
o
n
f
i
r
m
s
t
h
i
s
.
⟹
b
=
−
4
∗
2
3
=
−
3
2
.
Let the roots be a, b, c, d and given or related values quoted as {8} and {24}:
(a + b + c + d)^2 = a^2 + b^2 + c^2 + d^2 + 2 (a b + a c + a d + b c + b d + c d)
a^2 + b^2 + c^2 + d^2 = (a + b + c + d)^2 - 2 (a b + a c + a d + b c + b d + c d)
= {8}^2 - 2 {24} = {16}
Generally, Sqrt [(a^2 + b^2 + c^2 + d^2)/ 4] >= (a + b + c + d)/ 4
Specifically, Sqrt [{16}/ 4] = {8}/ 4 => If and only if a = b = c = d.
(x - a)^4 = x^4 - 4 a x + 6 a^2 x^2 - 4 a^3 x + a^4
= x^4 - 8 x + 24 x^2 + b x + c
Quoted that:
1) 4 a = 8
2) 6 a^2 = 24
3) - 4 a^3 = b
4) a^4 = c
Therefore a = 2, b = - 4 (2^3) and c = 2^4
b = -32 and c = 16 due to the fact of only possibility of all equal roots or all repeated roots.
We can check that no other value of (b, c) other than (-32, 16) can possibly satisfy.
Answer: -32
The easiest solution relies on the observation that our given polynomial f ( x ) can be written as ( x − 2 ) 4 . Some quick work with binomial expansion tells us that b = ( 3 4 ) ( − 2 ) 3 = − 3 2
Can you explain what you are trying to do? I agree that f ( x ) seems to want to look like ( x − 2 ) 4 , but that doesn't mean that it must be exactly equal to it.
Log in to reply
Yeah, I jumped the gun a little bit. Perhaps just a lucky and crude assumption. Mr. Cheong's solution seems more like the intended solution.
Log in to reply
Actually, I think that you are closer to a solution. However, the question, as phrased, currently has a solution set of b ≤ 3 2 . However, if the question as "has 4 real roots", then the answer is correct.
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
The question is about the A . M . − R . M . S inequality.
See that if x , y , z , w are roots of this equation, then
x + y + z + w = 8 and ∑ x y = 2 4
We know that ( x + y + z + w ) 2 = ∑ x 2 + 2 ∑ x y
∴ 8 2 = ∑ x 2 + 4 8
∴ 6 4 = ∑ x 2 + 4 8
∴ ∑ x 2 = 1 6
Now as they are positive, we apply the AM-RMS inequality-
4 x 2 + y 2 + z 2 + w 2 ≥ 4 x + y + z + w
and equality is only when x = y = z = w .
Now using the given values, we get R M S = A M = 2 hence x = y = z = w and hence all roots have to be 2 .
Answer = − ( x y z + y z w + z w x + w x y ) = − 3 2