1 5 2 + 3 5 2 + 6 3 2 + . . . . . . . + 9 9 9 9 2
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
But can't it be n 2 − 1 2 ? @sujoy roy
Log in to reply
Yes , the answer comes by this also good observation
n = 4 ∑ 1 0 0 ( n − 1 ) ( n + 1 ) 2
n = 4 ∑ 1 0 0 ( n − 1 1 − n + 1 1 )
3 1 − 1 0 1 1
This one came in NSEJS some time back.
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Given expression = ∑ n = 1 4 9 ( 2 n + 1 ) ( 2 n + 3 ) 2
= ∑ n = 1 4 9 [ ( 2 n + 1 ) ( 2 n + 3 ) ( 2 n + 3 ) − ( 2 n + 1 ) ]
= ∑ n = 1 4 9 [ 2 n + 1 1 − 2 n + 3 1 ]
= ( 3 1 − 5 1 ) + ( 5 1 − 7 1 ) + … + ( 9 9 1 − 1 0 1 1 )
= ( 3 1 − 1 0 1 1 ) = 0 . 3 2 3