Arithmetic Prime!

What is the smallest positive integer k k such that k + 1 , 2 k + 1 , 3 k + 1 , 4 k + 1 k+1,2k+1,3k+1,4k+1 are all primes?

If you think no such k k exists, enter your answer as 0.


Bonus: No such k k exists if k + 1 , 2 k + 1 , 3 k + 1 , . . . , n k + 1 k+1,2k+1,3k+1,...,nk+1 are all primes. Is this possible? If yes, what is the smallest n ? n?


The answer is 330.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

1 solution

Jordan Cahn
Oct 9, 2018

Note that k 1 k\neq1 since 3 ( 1 ) + 1 = 4 3(1)+1=4 is not prime and k 2 k\neq 2 since 4 ( 2 ) + 1 = 9 4(2)+1=9 is not prime. Now, k ≢ 1 m o d 2 k\not\equiv 1\bmod 2 , since, if it were, k + 1 0 m o d 2 k+1 \equiv 0\bmod 2 and, since we already know k 1 k\neq 1 , this cannot be prime.

Next, we consider k m o d 3 k \bmod 3 : k 1 m o d 3 k\equiv 1\bmod 3 and k 2 m o d 3 k\equiv 2\bmod 3 are both impossible, since they lead to 2 k + 1 0 m o d 3 2k+1\equiv 0\bmod 3 and k + 1 0 m o d 3 k+1\equiv0\bmod3 , respectively (remember k 2 k\neq 2 . Thus k 0 m o d 3 k\equiv 0\bmod 3 .

Similarly, we can show that k ≢ 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 m o d 5 k\not\equiv 1,2,3,4\bmod 5 , and so k 0 m o d 5 k\equiv 0\mod 5 . For k m o d 7 k\bmod7 , we find that k 0 , 1 , 4 m o d 7 k\equiv 0,1,4\bmod7 are all possibilities.

We could continue to test k m o d 11 k\bmod 11 , but at this point it is more efficient to try numbers based on the information we have. We need only test numbers that are multiples of 2, 3 and 5 (that is, multiples of 30) and which are congruent to 0, 1 or 4 mod 7. Thus our candidates are: 60 4 ( 60 ) + 1 = 121 = 1 1 2 is not prime 120 1 ( 120 ) + 1 = 121 = 1 1 2 is not prime 210 4 ( 210 ) + 1 = 841 = 2 9 2 is not prime 270 4 ( 270 ) + 1 = 1081 = 23 × 47 is not prime 330 All four are prime! \begin{array}{rl} 60 & 4(60) + 1 = 121 = 11^2 \text{ is not prime}\\ 120 & 1(120) + 1 = 121 = 11^2 \text{ is not prime}\\ 210 & 4(210) + 1 = 841 = 29^2 \text{ is not prime}\\ 270 & 4(270) + 1 = 1081 = 23\times47 \text{ is not prime}\\ \boxed{330} & \text{All four are prime!} \end{array}

@X X Is this the only way???? I mean, what if we need the second smallest or the fifth smallest k ???? What was your intended approach??

Aaghaz Mahajan - 2 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

@Mark Hennings Sir, could you help me out here please???

Aaghaz Mahajan - 2 years, 4 months ago

@Pi Han Goh @Jon Haussmann @Brian Charlesworth @Otto Bretscher Sir, can anyone help me out here please......??

Aaghaz Mahajan - 2 years, 3 months ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...