Dan claims that in every arithmetic progression of non-negative integers in which the first element is 0, there exist three integer numbers and such that . Is Dan's claim true?
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
If n is the first number of the progression then by definition 3n, 4n and 5n will also be in there and these 3 numbers are always a Pythagorean Triple