If x , x 2 , x 3 are three distinct real numbers, which of the following inequalities can be true?
Note: You can select more than one answer. This is a new answer format for Brilliant.
Select one or more
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
For proving x > x 3 > x 2 cannot be true, notice for nonzero x the signs will be
positive > postive > positive
or
negative > negative > positive.
Only the first can be true. Now, when think of multiplying x by itself, if x > 1 the value is constantly increasing, so x 2 > x ; this does not match the inequality we want.
If 0 < x < 1 the value of x is constantly decreasing when multiplying x by itself, so x 3 < x 2 ; again, this does not match the inequality we want.
When x = 1 the inequality is clearly false. We've eliminating every possible value for x , so it can never be true that x > x 3 > x 2 .
In the first case, X should be negative and smaller than -1.
@Pi Han Goh ,how do you contribute a problem with more than one answers?
Log in to reply
I really don't know. The staffs made these edits. I hope they can shed some light on how they did it.
This looks like an interesting way to pose a problem. I'm definitely a fan of this.
It is a private, staff-only feature at this time. We'll eventually release it to everyone.
Log in to reply
I really like this new feature!
OK,I see.Thanks!
Yes. Multiple Choice Questions are very important. These play an important role in IIT Advanced exam. I hope this feature will be available to the community members soon.
Actually I am felling jealousy of you people. You write good solutions to math problems where more people will discuss solutions and chances of getting more up votes are there. But I am not having that opportunity. Because I am basically a physics dependent student. If you want you can see my posts and solutions (or directly go to my contributions page) and you will see only physics questions have more solvers and my physics solutions have more up votes. I don't know why but due to some reason (like already somebody posted with my idea or my solution is wrong). I am not worrying about this but the problem only few will discuss physics problems and hence the chances of getting more up votes are less. If you want see the fourth problem of this problems of the week (easy) by Rohit Gupta. Only 51 people are discussing it. Not only this but most physics problems have less discussions.
I don't know why I have posted this comment but I wanted to keep this because everyone should know my point of discussing solutions. If you want I will delete this comment after some days.
I hope some day I will bag a jackpot of up votes and satisfy my desire.
Then, there must be two answers from the choices. :) The answer must be either the first and the third choice. How can we say that the third choice is the best answer and the first choice is incorrect, if they are both possible and actually are the answers? :)
Log in to reply
Yes, the only way to get this correct is to select both. Apparently, multiple selection is a new experimental feature in Brilliant.
Log in to reply
I see. Thank you so much. I was not able to know or notice about this new feature.
What if x = 0 then all should be right .
Log in to reply
If x=0, for all choices to be right, the 2nd choice must use equal, or greater or equal and less than or equal signs arranged wisely.
x is the best because you can use it it prove the others
Can you explain why the third case is impossible?
In the case of x=1 ( in which case 1^2=1 and 1^3 still = 1) In option 1 you have 1<1<1 ?? Solutions 2 & 3 are the same. Am I wrong or does this question require that x does not =1 ?
Log in to reply
We're asking which of the inequalities can be true; one of them being true in a particular case doesn't mean it will be true in all cases. In the case of x = 1, none of them are true.
Wow I thought those were just tags to x and was about to complain why do they look like square roots
Since x , x 2 , x 3 are distinct real numbers so let's consider some of the following cases
case1 : If x > 1 , then it's always true that x < x 2 < x 3 such as 2 < 4 < 8 also if x ∈ Q or rational number then always true that x > x 2 > x 3 or x 3 < x 2 < x such as 8 1 < 4 1 < 2 1 . (inequality reverses)
case 2 : if x < − 1 then it's always true that x 2 > x > x 3 such as 9 > − 3 > − 2 7 and also for negative rational numbers it always true that x 2 > x 3 > x
case 3: If x > 1 is an irrational number then it true that x < x 2 < x 3 such as 2 < 2 < ( 2 ) 3 and its also true that x 3 < x 2 < x such as ( 2 ) 3 1 < 2 1 < 2 1
case 4: if x < 1 is irrational number then it will be similar to case 2:
Hence for distinct real numbers inequalities x < x 2 < x 3 and x 3 < x < x 2 are always true .
options... answer options didn't offer all possible solutions. I hadn't thought of non-real solutions as in the case of negative X, but in cases of smaller than 1, then X > x^2 > x^3... and if this stuff entails imaginary numbers, would you concur we're all screwed!?
Doesn't the set of rational numbers also include numbers like 1.5? As far as I can tell, case 1 is incomplete. You have Case 1a: x > 1 and x is an integer Case 1b: x < 1 and x is rational
I think you are missing: Case 1c: x > 1 and x is rational Case 1d: x = 1
@ Karen Bhandari - No, use x = -1/2. Then x^2 = 1/4 and x^3 = -1/8. In your last line, those inequalities are not always true.
I tried to graph the functions: f(x)=x, g(x)= x 2 , h(x)= x 3 , and then tried to find x values which satisfy the above inequalities. The first one is true for x>1 and the third one is true for x<-1. So only the 1st and 3rd answers are correct. I also found the: x, x 2 , x 3 inequality for -1<x<0 and the x 3 , x 2 , x, inequality for 0<x<1
Two such triangles make one isocel
Sorry two triangles put side by side make a square or a parallelogram or an isoceles triangle.
Firstly, x = x 2 = x 3 if x = 0 or x = 1 , so we must have x = 0 and x = 1 .
Inequality 1 ( x < x 2 < x 3 ) . Let x = 2 . Then 2 < 2 2 < 2 3 and so the first inequality can be true.
Inequality 3 ( x 3 < x < x 2 ) . Let x = − 2 . Then ( − 2 ) 3 < − 2 < ( − 2 ) 2 and so the third inequality can be true.
Inequality 2 It remains to show whether or not x 2 < x 3 < x for some x ∈ R .
Assume a 2 < a 3 < a for some a ∈ R (and a = 0 , a = 1 ).
Since a 2 < a 3 ⇒ a 2 ( a − 1 ) > 0 , we have:
(1) a 2 < 0 and a − 1 < 0
(2) a 2 > 0 and a − 1 > 0 .
Because (1) is not possible, (2) implies a ∈ ( 1 , ∞ ) .
Since a 3 < a ⇒ a ( a 2 − 1 ) < 0 , we have:
(3) a < 0 ∩ a 2 > 1 ⇒ a ∈ ( − ∞ , − 1 ) XOR
(4) a > 0 ∩ a 2 < 1 ⇒ a ∈ ( 0 , 1 )
Hence a ∈ ( − ∞ , − 1 ) ∪ ( 0 , 1 ) . This is a contradiction, since a 2 < a 3 implied a ∈ ( 1 , ∞ ) ( a cannot be a member of two disjoint sets).
Very neat solution. Thank you!
There are great solutions already but I want to point out that you can divide through by x squared because it’s always positive so it won’t change the inequality but simplifies the problem. This simplifies all the inequalities and make them easier to examine.
You forgot the option x 3 < x 2 < x that can also be true (when x is a fraction between 0 and 1)
Idk if I did it right but I just broke it down to 4 ways x is positive and greater than 1 x^3>x^2>x x is positive and less than 1 x>x^2>x^3 x is negative and greater than -1 x^2>x^3>x^1 x is negative and less than -1 x^2>x>x^3 2 of these are there and the third one is not
x^3 < x^2 < x (If it's a fraction)
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
When x is negative, x 2 > x > x 3 . For example, take x = − 2 Then, 4 > − 2 > − 8
When x is positive and greater than 1, x 3 > x 2 > x . For example when x = 2 ,then 8 > 4 > 2 . We can see any positive number greater than one always increases with greater powers.
But the case x > x 3 > x 2 is impossible.
Hence, only the first and third cases are possible.