As simple as ABC

9 9 9 × A B C D E F 1 3 2 \begin{array} { l l l l l } & & & & & 9 & 9 & 9 \\ \times & & & & & A & B & C \\ \hline & & D & E & F & 1 & 3 & 2 \\ \end{array}

In this cryptogram, A , B , C , D , E A,B,C,D,E and F F are (not necessarily distinct) single digits. What is the value of A + B + C + D + E + F ? A+B+C+D+E+F?


The answer is 43.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

5 solutions

999 × A B C = A B C ( 1000 1 ) = A B C 000 A B C = D E F 132 1000 A B C = 132 A B C = 868 999 × 868 = 867132 A + B + C + D + E + F = 8 + 6 + 8 + 8 + 6 + 7 = 43 999\times \overline{ABC} = \overline{ABC}(1000-1) = \overline{ABC000} -\overline{ABC} = \overline{DEF132} \\ \Rightarrow 1000 - \overline{ABC} = 132 \quad \Rightarrow \overline{ABC} = 868 \quad \Rightarrow 999 \times 868 = 867132 \\ \quad \Rightarrow A+B+C+D+E+F = 8+6+8+8+6+7 = \boxed{43}

Moderator note:

Good work! Bonus question: What would the answer be if I change the number 999 999 to 998 998 ?

Applying the same principle, we have:

998 × A B C = A B C ( 1000 2 ) = A B C 000 2 × A B C 998\times \overline{ABC} = \overline{ABC} (1000-2) = \overline{ABC000} - 2\times \overline{ABC}

2 × A B C = { 1000 132 = 868 A B C = 434 998 × 434 = 433132 2000 132 = 1868 A B C = 934 998 × 934 = 932132 \Rightarrow 2\times \overline{ABC} = \begin{cases} 1000-132 = 868 & \Rightarrow \overline{ABC} = 434 \\ & \Rightarrow 998\times 434 = 433132 \\ 2000-132 = 1868 & \Rightarrow \overline{ABC} = 934 \\ & \Rightarrow 998\times 934 = 932132 \end{cases}

Chew-Seong Cheong - 6 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

for 2XABC WHY DID U CONSIDER 2000-132? PLEASE CAN U EXPLAIN?

Bharat Naik - 6 years ago

Log in to reply

Because A B C × 2 \overline{ABC}\times 2 can be larger than 1000 1000 but A B C \overline{ABC} is definitely less than 1000 1000 .

Chew-Seong Cheong - 6 years ago

Without having to change DEF132; would you be able to use this principle for 997 × ABC = DEF132?

Thanks in advance

Jakob Johnson - 5 years, 2 months ago

Sir can u plz explain that step of

1000-ABC = 132 how

Sushant Agarwal - 6 years ago

Log in to reply

From 999 × A B C = A B C 000 A B C = D E F 132 \space 999\times \overline{ABC} = \overline{ABC000} - \overline{ABC} = \overline{DEF132}\space or

\(\begin{array} {} & A & B & C & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ - & & & & A & B & C \\ \hline & D & E & F & 1 & 3 & 2 \end{array} \)

Can you get A B C \overline{ABC} from the above? If you do, what you would have done was probably 1000 A B C = 132 1000 - \overline{ABC} = 132 . That is how we normally do in arithmetic. We borrow 1 1 in front, because 000 \overline{000} cannot minus A B C \overline{ABC} .

Chew-Seong Cheong - 6 years ago

Log in to reply

Yep, he made a mistake there

Luis Rivera - 5 years ago

Awesome solution dude!, greetings from México

Angel T. López - 6 years ago

Even i had got ABC as 868 but then i saw DEF should have been different then ABC but A & D and B & E are equal i.e A=D & B=E. It was not specifically mentioned in the question whether ABC can have values same to values of DEF.

Karthik Thakkar - 6 years ago

999 x ABC = (1000-1) x ABC = ABC000 - ABC = DEF132 .: ABC000 = DEF132 + ABC .: ABC = 868 DEF132 + 868 = 868000 .: DEF132 = 868000 - 868 .: DEF132 = 867132 .: DEF = 867 So, 8+6+8+8+6+7=43

Faraz Ansari - 5 years, 4 months ago

You guys help me with something. If ABC is 868, why where A and C represented with different letters

Uthman Tanko - 2 years, 3 months ago

This method is so short and sweet... My method is so big and complicated... U P V O T E D + 1 UPVOTED +1

Vighnesh Raut - 6 years, 1 month ago
Des O Carroll
May 9, 2015

999x=1000y+132

1000x=x+1000y+132

1000(x-y)=x+132

x+132=1000 and x-y=1

x=868 and y=867

summing the digits of x and y gives the answer=43

Moderator note:

This is correct too!

why do you assume x-y=1 ??

José Isaac Tijerina - 5 years ago

Log in to reply

x = ABC => x<1000 => x+132<1132 => 1000(x-y)<1132 => (x-y)<1.132

Since x and y are distinct whole numbers x-y=1

Lishan Aklog - 1 year, 6 months ago

The number is divisible by nine obviously. The Divisibility rules says that if a number is a factor of 9 , all the digits add up to 9. 1 + 3+ 2 = 6. Then it's just a matter. of finding three numbers that add up 21, and when added to the 6, make 27, and 2 + 7 = 9

Luis Rivera - 5 years ago
Vighnesh Raut
May 8, 2015

As the last digit is 2 2 , C C must be equal to 8 8 . As second last digit is 3 3 , 9 C + 7 + 9 B ( m o d 10 ) 9C+7+9B (mod 10) must be equal to 3 3 . 72 + 7 + 9 B = 79 + 9 B = 9 + 9 B = 9 ( B + 1 ) ( m o d 10 ) 72+7+9B=79+9B=9+9B=9(B+1) (mod 10) . Hence, B + 1 = 7 B+1=7 or B = 6 B=6 . Now, solving for A, 999 ( A ) ( 100 ) + ( 999 ) ( 68 ) 132 ( m o d 1000 ) ( 1 ) ( A ) ( 100 ) + ( 1 ) ( 68 ) 132 ( m o d 1000 ) 200 + 100 A 0 ( m o d 1000 ) 999(A)(100)+(999)(68)\equiv 132\quad (mod\quad 1000)\\ (-1)(A)(100)+(-1)(68)\equiv 132\quad (mod\quad 1000)\\ 200+100A\equiv 0\quad (mod\quad 1000)\quad so, A = 8 A=8 giving us the 3 3 digit number A B C ABC as 868 868 .Hence, 999 868 = 867132 999*868=867132

Moderator note:

There's a simpler solution for this. Hint: 999 + 1 = 1000 999+1=1000 .

But this is a solution! And not a bad one at all; being iterative, it’s easy to solve mentally.

Seeing multiple ways to solve a problem is a beautiful thing. That’s why I love reading all the diverse problem solving methods for each question on Brilliant.

A Former Brilliant Member - 3 years, 1 month ago
Lam Nguyen
May 12, 2015

999 = -1 (mod 1000) DEF132 = 132 (mod 1000) => -abc = 132 (mod 1000) <=> abc = 868

Tim Boan
Oct 3, 2017

For 998 vs 999 solution is 21

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...