Consider f ( x ) = a x 2 + b x + c , where a , b and c are real numbers and f ( x ) is such that it takes real values for all real x and non-real values for all non-real x . Then which of the following is necessarily true?
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Let's prove first that a=0. If a≠0, then we can prove that for some non real z we'll have az²+bz as a real number. Now let that real number be k. So now we want az²+bz=k where a,b and k are real numbers and a≠0. We can always find such k so that the above equation has non real roots. So the expression ax²+bx+c will attain a real value for at least one non real x if a≠0 . So a=0. b and c are not necessarily 0 as we take an example 2x+1 which satisfies all the given conditions.
It is not necessary that c = 0 , as ( a x 2 + b x ) ∈ R ⇒ ( a x 2 + b x + c ) ∈ R and ( a x 2 + b x ) ∈ C ∖ R ⇒ ( a x 2 + b x + c ) ∈ C ∖ R ( ∀ c ∈ R )
So the first and the third option are ruled out.
If b = 0 is necessary (the second option), it is clear that it isn't sufficient in that it necessarily implies a = 0 (otherwise: a ∗ ( i 2 ) + c = c − a ∈ R ).
But as only one option is correct this leaves us with the fourth option, that a = 0 .
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Let f ( m + n i ) = z where ( m , n ) ∈ R and n = 0 . We then have ℑ ( z ) = 2 a m n + b n = n ( 2 a m + b ) According to conditions of problem, ℑ ( z ) = 0 Thus, n ( 2 a m + b ) = 0 Since n = 0 , we must have 2 a m + b = 0 , but if m = 2 a − b then 2 a m + b = 0 . This can be avoided iff a = 0 .