This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
This integral was studied by Johann Bernoulli and he called it the 'series mirabilis'; and with good reason:
I = ∫ 0 1 x x d x = 1 − 2 2 1 + 3 3 1 − 4 4 1 . . .
I am unaware of the existence of a closed form. But, for the purpose of this question, manually adding just the first 3 or 4 terms gives the required result. (Or you could just Wolfram-alpha it -_-)
N o t e :
For an outline of a proof of this result, see this .
A related series is ∫ 0 1 x − x d x = 1 + 2 2 1 + 3 3 1 + 4 4 1 . . .
Correct but I believe that he (along with his brother) is famous for solving the Bernoulli DE . I'm sure you must know all about it , don't you?
Log in to reply
@Azhaghu Roopesh M It's even there for JEE, so it's no biggie :)....
But what's more interesting to me is the work that he did on the calculus of variations along with his elder brother Jacob; and all because they wanted to beat each other at math :D
Since exact answer is not required, I have used Numerical Integration . Here, f ( x ) = x x and x varies from 0 to 1. Split this interval into two parts ,i.e., break at 0 . 5 (you can split the interval into more parts in order to get more exact answer)
Interval size h = 0 . 5 Now, we have three values of x ,say :
x 0 = 0 which implies y 0 = f ( x 0 ) = x → 0 lim x x = 1
x 1 = 0 . 5 which implies y 1 = f ( x 1 ) = 0 . 5 0 . 5 = 0 . 7 0 7 1
x 2 = 1 which implies y 2 = f ( x 2 ) = 1 1 = 1
Using the Trapezoidal Rule,
I = 2 h ( y 0 + y 1 + 2 y 1 ) I = 0 . 8 5 3 5 5 8 I = 6 . 8 2 8
Thus, ⌊ 8 I ⌋ = 6
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
The easiest way to do this question is to bind it between two functions.
Look at the rough graph of x x . All the points have been labelled and their respective coordinates given.
Now, observe that:
A r e a ( O B C E ) + A r e a ( △ D P C ) < ∫ 0 1 x x d x < A r ( O B C E ) + A r ( △ D P C ) + A r ( △ A B P )
⇒ x x + 2 1 ( 1 − x ) ( 1 − x x ) < ∫ 0 1 x x d x < 2 1 + x x
Now, putting x equal to our old friend 0 . 5 means that x x ≈ 0 . 7 .
⇒ 0 . 7 8 0 < ∫ 0 1 x x d x < 0 . 8 5
⇒ 6 . 2 4 < 8 ∫ 0 1 x x d x < 6 . 8
Hence ⌊ 8 ∫ 0 1 x x d x ⌋ = 6
I know that this is a very crude method(and slightly incorrect), but it will work in this case. Why doesn't this happen to me in the exam! :/