A classical mechanics problem by Rohith M.Athreya

A particle subjected to a central force moves in a circle identified by the equation r = r 0 cos θ r=r_{0}\cos\theta where ( r , θ ) (r, \theta) is the instantaneous address of the particle in polar coordinates. The central force varies with radial distance as 1 r n \frac{1}{r^{n}} in the radial direction. Input the value of n n .


The answer is 5.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

1 solution

Mark Hennings
Oct 27, 2017

The differential equation for central motion r ¨ = K r n r ^ \ddot{\mathbf{r}} \; = \; -\frac{K}{r^n}\hat{\mathbf{r}} becomes r ¨ r θ ˙ 2 = K r n r 2 θ ˙ = h \ddot{r} - r\dot{\theta}^2 \; = \; -Kr^{-n} \hspace{2cm} r^2\dot{\theta} = h for some constant h h , after introducing polar coordinates. Thus r ¨ h 2 r 3 = K r n \ddot{r} - h^2r^{-3} \; = \; -Kr^{-n} If we put r = u 1 r = u^{-1} then r ˙ = h d u d θ r ¨ = h 2 u 2 d 2 u d θ 2 \dot{r} = -h\frac{du}{d\theta} \hspace{2cm} \ddot{r} = -h^2u^2\frac{d^2u}{d\theta^2} so we obtain the differential equation d 2 u d θ 2 + u = K h 2 u n 2 \frac{d^2u}{d\theta^2} + u \; = \; \tfrac{K}{h^2}u^{n-2} The solution r = r 0 cos θ r = r_0\cos\theta , so u = r 0 1 sec θ u = r_0^{-1}\sec\theta , is possible provided that r 0 1 ( sec θ tan 2 θ + sec 3 θ ) + r 0 1 sec θ = K h 2 r 0 n 2 sec n 2 θ r_0^{-1}\big(\sec\theta\tan^2\theta + \sec^3\theta\big) + r_0^{-1}\sec\theta \; = \; \frac{K}{h^2r_0^{n-2}} \sec^{n-2}\theta which is possible provided that n = 5 n = \boxed{5} and K = 2 h 2 r 0 2 K = 2h^2r_0^2 .

Sir, I don't quite understand why r ¨ \ddot{r} has to be a monomial function of radial distance.If, suppose, I had asked ,subjectively ,to determine the causative force without asking for the value of n n or without mentioning that the force varies as the n t h n^{th} power of the inverse of the radial distance, then how would your approach change?

Rohith M.Athreya - 3 years, 7 months ago

Log in to reply

Hardly at all. The force acting would then be of the form g ( r ) r ^ g(r)\hat{\mathbf{r}} , and we could proceed to obtain a differential equation for u u in terms of θ \theta . The requirement for a circular solution would have then defined the function g g .

Mark Hennings - 3 years, 7 months ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...