Badminton II

Algebra Level 3

Two players are playing a shortened version of badminton: a k k -point, n n -game match with no deuce, where n , k > 1 n,k > 1 are integers, and n n is odd. Specifically, in each game, the player who first scores k k points wins. The winner of the match is the player who first wins n 2 \lceil \frac{n}{2}\rceil out of n n games.

Is it possible for the loser to earn possible maximum amount of points not strictly more than the winner's possible minimum amount of points? If so, how many choices of n n and k k are there?


See the report

Yes, infinitely many choices. Yes, only one choice. No, None of the answers.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

1 solution

Michael Huang
Sep 5, 2017

The minimum amount of points that the winner can accumulate is min(winner) = n 2 k \text{min(winner)} = \left\lceil \dfrac{n}{2} \right\rceil \cdot k .

The maximum amount of points that the loser can accumulate is max(loser) = ( n 2 1 ) k + n 2 ( k 1 ) \text{max(loser)} = \left(\left\lceil \dfrac{n}{2} \right\rceil - 1\right) \cdot k + \left\lceil \dfrac{n}{2} \right\rceil \left(k - 1\right) , which shows that the loser loses one more game than he wins with all maximum possible amounts.

For the loser to be unable to earn more points than the winner, we need min(winner) max(loser) \text{min(winner)} \geq \text{max(loser)} , which is equivalent to solving n 2 ( 2 n 2 1 ) k n 2 \left\lceil \dfrac{n}{2} \right\rceil \geq \left(2\left\lceil \dfrac{n}{2} \right\rceil - 1\right) \cdot k - \left\lceil \dfrac{n}{2} \right\rceil Setting n = 2 p + 1 n = 2p + 1 , where p p is nonnegative integer, we have ( p + 1 ) k ( 2 ( p + 1 ) 1 ) k ( p + 1 ) (p + 1)\cdot k \geq \left(2(p + 1) - 1\right) \cdot k - (p + 1) where k p + 1 p k \leq \dfrac{p + 1}{p} . But since k > 1 k > 1 , the only choice we have is p = 1 , k = 2 p = 1, k = 2 , which gives the answer for the problem.

It seems there should be some more words in the last option.

Munem Shahriar - 3 years, 9 months ago

Log in to reply

Yes, I think it should be "No, it is not possible" , is that right Michael?

Pi Han Goh - 3 years, 9 months ago

What about n=1, k = any other positive integer?

Siva Budaraju - 3 years, 9 months ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...