Two players are playing a shortened version of badminton: a -point, -game match with no deuce, where are integers, and is odd. Specifically, in each game, the player who first scores points wins. The winner of the match is the player who first wins out of games.
Is it possible for the loser to earn possible maximum amount of points not strictly more than the winner's possible minimum amount of points? If so, how many choices of and are there?
See the report
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
The minimum amount of points that the winner can accumulate is min(winner) = ⌈ 2 n ⌉ ⋅ k .
The maximum amount of points that the loser can accumulate is max(loser) = ( ⌈ 2 n ⌉ − 1 ) ⋅ k + ⌈ 2 n ⌉ ( k − 1 ) , which shows that the loser loses one more game than he wins with all maximum possible amounts.
For the loser to be unable to earn more points than the winner, we need min(winner) ≥ max(loser) , which is equivalent to solving ⌈ 2 n ⌉ ≥ ( 2 ⌈ 2 n ⌉ − 1 ) ⋅ k − ⌈ 2 n ⌉ Setting n = 2 p + 1 , where p is nonnegative integer, we have ( p + 1 ) ⋅ k ≥ ( 2 ( p + 1 ) − 1 ) ⋅ k − ( p + 1 ) where k ≤ p p + 1 . But since k > 1 , the only choice we have is p = 1 , k = 2 , which gives the answer for the problem.