Baywatch

While swimming in the sea, a man suddenly suffers a heart attack. A lifeguard on the beach immediately recognizes the situation and wants to rush to the man before he drowns.

The lifeguard is twice as fast on land than in water.

What route must the lifeguard take to reach the drowning man as quickly as possible?

(A) (B) (C) (D) (E)

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

1 solution

Markus Michelmann
Sep 10, 2017

There are two different strategies to minimize the total running time T T for the lifeguard:

  • Minimize the overall path length
  • Minimize line segment inside the water

While the straight path in (C) optimizes the overall path length, the route in (E) has the shortest swim distance. The route in (D) is a compromise between the opposing strategies and represents the true optimum.

To be more precise we consider a path between the points Q = ( 0 , 0 ) Q = (0,0) (lifeguard) and P = ( X , Y ) P = (X,Y) (drowning man) with an intermediate point R = ( x , y ) R = (x,y) at the store. The distance of both line segments on the beach and in the water are s 1 = x 2 + y 2 and s 2 = ( X x ) 2 + ( Y y ) 2 s_1 = \sqrt{x^2 + y^2} \qquad \text{and} \qquad s_2 = \sqrt{(X-x)^2 + (Y-y)^2} The total time T T , that the lifeguard needs to reach the man, reads T = t 1 + t 2 = s 1 v 1 + s 2 v 2 = x 2 + y 2 v 1 + ( X x ) 2 + ( Y y ) 2 v 1 T = t_1 + t_2 = \frac{s_1}{v_1} + \frac{s_2}{v_2} = \frac{\sqrt{x^2 + y^2}}{v_1} + \frac{\sqrt{(X-x)^2 + (Y-y)^2}}{v_1} with the velocities v 1 v_1 and v 2 v_2 for running and swimming (with v 1 = 2 v 2 v_1 = 2 v_2 ). The only free parameter is the coordinate x x , where the lifeguard reaches the shore. To minimize the recue time T T , we zero the derivative d T d x = x v 1 x 2 + y 2 X x v 1 ( X x ) 2 + ( Y y ) 2 = ! 0 (*) \frac{dT}{dx} = \frac{x}{v_1 \sqrt{x^2 + y^2}} - \frac{X - x}{v_1 \sqrt{(X-x)^2 + (Y-y)^2}} \stackrel{!}{=} 0 \qquad \text{(*)} Rewriting sin α = x v 1 x 2 + y 2 , sin β = X y ( X x ) 2 + ( Y y ) 2 \sin \alpha = \frac{x}{v_1 \sqrt{x^2 + y^2}}, \quad \sin \beta = \frac{X - y}{\sqrt{(X-x)^2 + (Y-y)^2}} with the angle α \alpha and β \beta of incidence and refraction, the equation (*) reads sin α v 1 = sin β v 2 or sin α sin β = v 1 v 2 \frac{\sin \alpha}{v_1} = \frac{\sin \beta}{v_2} \quad \text{or} \quad \frac{\sin \alpha}{\sin \beta} = \frac{v_1}{v_2} This is identical to Snell's law, which decribes the light refraction at boundary between two different isotropic media. In our case, the optimal path is gives by the condition sin α = 2 sin β \sin \alpha = 2 \sin \beta , so that the relation α > β > 0 \alpha > \beta > 0 must be fulfilled. This geometric constraint is only true for the path (D).

You wrote: "The optimal path should meet the following conditions: •The overall path length must be as short as possible •The line segment inside the water must be as short as possible"

Both of these are false; the optimal path is neither as short as possible (Option C) nor does is have the segment in the water as short as possible (Option E). Saying that "[the] route in (D) between both limit cases meets both conditions" is false.

Framing it this way is misleading.

The solution minimizes time, a single variable. That's conceptually simpler, and has the benefit of being accurate and reflecting the math.

Nick Singer - 3 years, 9 months ago

Log in to reply

Nick Singer, you have a point, my solution was not very precise and accurate. I tried to give a qualitative argument, why the path in (D) is the optimal choice. Instead of demanding two conditions, that cannot be true at the same time, is should framed these conditions as opposing strategies. Following these strategies, we come closer to the optimum, so that we can make an educated guess about the true solution.

I changed my wording and added also a diagram to my solution. I hope, my statements are now more reasonable.

Markus Michelmann - 3 years, 9 months ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...