Bifonacci

Fibonacci numbers are defined as follows: f 0 = 0 , f 1 = 1 , f_0=0,f_1=1, and f n = f n 1 + f n 2 f_n=f_{n-1}+f_{n-2} for n 2. n\ge 2.

How many pairs ( f m , f n ) , \big(f_m,f_n\big), where f m f_m and f n f_n are Fibonacci numbers less than 1 0 8 , 10^8, have the property that gcd ( f m , f n ) = 233 ? \gcd\big(f_m,f_n\big)=233?

Notation: gcd ( ) \gcd(\cdot) denotes the greatest common divisor function.


The answer is 9.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

1 solution

Firstly, the following fact, about Fibonacci numbers, is helpful.

g c d ( f m , f n ) = f g c d ( m , n ) gcd(f_m,f_n)=f_{gcd(m,n)}

Secondly, when f m < 1 0 8 f_m<10^8 , then m < 40 m<40 and this can be verified by having a look at Fibonacci numbers list.

Final fact is to realise that 233 = f 13 233=f_{13}

then we can get to the main Problem.

g c d ( f m , f n ) = f g c d ( m , n ) = 233 = f 13 g c d ( m , n ) = 13 gcd(f_m,f_n)=f_{gcd(m,n)}=233=f_{13} \implies gcd(m,n)=13

since m , n < 40 m,n<40 , the following pairs ( m , n ) (m,n) would lead to g c d ( m , n ) = 13 g c d ( f m , f n ) = 233 gcd(m,n)=13 \implies gcd(f_m,f_n)=233

( 13 , 26 ) , ( 26 , 13 ) , ( 26 , 39 ) , ( 39 , 26 ) , ( 13 , 39 ) , ( 39 , 13 ) , ( 13 , 13 ) , ( 0 , 13 ) , ( 13 , 0 ) (13,26),(26,13),(26,39),(39,26),(13,39),(39,13),(13,13),(0,13),(13,0)

Nice solution. Note that we could also find the value of m for which f m < 1 0 8 f_m<10^8 by using Binet's formula.

Shanthanu Rai - 2 years, 6 months ago

Please help me by identifying my error: F¹³ =233={((√5+1)/2)^13-((1-√5)/2)^13}/√5; Now multiplying both sides by n: {n∆^13-nß^13}/√5=233n. [∆=. {(√5+1)/2}^13, ß={(1-√5)/2}^13. ,And also ∆=-1/ß ]

Now,Let n∆^13=∆^k¹........(i) nß^13=ß^k².........(ii) Dividing these two equations: ∆^(13-k¹)=ß^(13-k²)=(-1/∆)^(13-k²); ∆^{26-(k¹+k²)}=(-1)^(13-k²);......(iii) Now,Multiplying (i) & (ii) and using ∆=-1/ß,we get: -n^2=(-1)^k².∆^(k¹-k²)......(iv) Putting the value of ∆^(k¹-k²) from eqn (iv) to eqn (iii): { ∆^26.(-1)^(k²-1)}/n^2=(-1)^(13-k²); ∆^26/n^2=(-1)^(14-2k²) =1 Giving n=∆^13; Now please tell me where is the wrong there??? please....hurry

Rupayan Jana - 2 years, 6 months ago

Fibonacci number no. 13, 26, 39, ... are multiples of 233. Can you give a proof?

Atomsky Jahid - 2 years, 6 months ago

Log in to reply

just use the relation that I used in the solution. gcd(f(13),f(13t))=f(gcd(13,13t))=f(13)=233. so 233 should always divide f(13t) for all t

A Former Brilliant Member - 2 years, 6 months ago

To Atomsky Jahid question, please read this proof .

I got stung by the fact that I did not know that the greatest common integer of 0 and a positive integer was defined and was that positive integer. I also forgot to apply the limitation of f m < = 1 0 8 f_m<=10^8 and was using a larger set of Fibonacci numbers.

A Former Brilliant Member - 2 years, 4 months ago

1 pending report

Vote up reports you agree with

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...