Blend Of Thermodynamics And Mechanics

If nitrogen gas molecule goes straight up with its RMS (Root Mean Square) speed at 0 C { 0 }^{ \circ }\text{C} from the surface of the earth and there are no collisions with other molecules, then it will rise to an approximate height of __________ \text{\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_} .

12 km \text{12 km} 12 m \text{12 m} 8 m \text{8 m} 8 km \text{8 km}

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

1 solution

Rajdeep Dhingra
Mar 4, 2016

First we calculate speed of the N 2 N_2 molecule.
We know that v r m s = 3 R T M v_{rms} = \sqrt{\frac{3RT}{M}} where R is Universal Gas Constant , T is the Temperature in Kelvin and M is the Molecular Mass in kg m o l 1 \text{kg }{mol}^{-1} . For N 2 N_2 is 28 × 10 3 28 \times {10}^{-3} .

Plugging in the values we get v r m s 2 = 243184.5 m 2 s 2 {v_{rms}}^2 = 243184.5 m^2s^{-2} .
To calculate maximum height, H , reached we know that H = v 2 2 g H = \frac{v^2}{2g} .
Plugging in values we get that H = 12166.3515 m H = \boxed{12166.3515 m} . Which is approximately 12 k m \boxed{12 km} .

Q . E . D . Q.E.D.

Thank you.

Swapnil Das - 5 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

Welcome. I hope you liked the solution.

Rajdeep Dhingra - 5 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

Of course, I did.

Swapnil Das - 5 years, 3 months ago

I find this problem hard to understand.

Are you saying that the initial velocity is v r m s v_{rms} and then that nothing else matters? If so, that should be made more obvious. Currently, I read this question as "Nitrogen gas is released at the surface of the earth at 0 ^\circ C. Find the height to which it rises".

Calvin Lin Staff - 5 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

Yes sir it only depends on v r m s v_{rms} .

Rajdeep Dhingra - 5 years, 3 months ago

Great chance of marking the q ans as 12m because of not taking in consider mass in kg . One more thing that rms value has been very wisely picked since ht is proportional to square of velocity so in case u did nt mentioned RMS speed in q and rather used the term avg ht. Then even ans remained same and q had became a little tricky since we would take velocities of particle as v1 v2 v3 v4 and then found it proportional to vrms^2 and better u mention in q avg speed rather tha n temp to let it to the solvers to understand which velocity to take in account

aryan goyat - 4 years, 7 months ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...