What is the minimum number of cuts required to divide any cube into 27 smaller equal cubes?
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
I assumed that cut meant "with a knife or blade", so I got the right answer. However, if you were to use an appropriately sized tic-tac-toe shaped cookie cutter (not sure if anyone actually makes one) -- assuming the cube material was soft enough, the answer would be 2.
The rubiks cube helps you if you cut along each line in the cube to the bottom u will get 27 cubes as you only need to make 2 vertical cuts 2 horizontal cuts and 2 cuts on the top
The centre cube has to be split from the other cubes that touch all 6 faces. Clearly, only one face can be 'revealed' at a time, so the minimum number of cuts required is 6.
Since you need 27 smaller cubes, the length of each side should be 3 because 3 3 = 2 7 .
Imagine this cube in a space in R 3 with the regular coordinate axes x , y , and z . Imagine one of the cube's verticies at the origin, and three of the edges along the axes. The planes needed to cut this cube into 27 smaller cubes are: x = 1 , x = 2 , y = 1 , y = 2 , z = 1 , z = 2 .
Therefore, assuming that each cut can go through more than one unit, six cuts are necessary to make 2 7 smaller cubes.
Although I would argue that this is an impossible problem ... a Rubik's Cube doesn't actually have a cube in the middle! (Take one apart and see for yourself😄)
to get rid of the middle cube, we hv to cut it 24 times.. partially. 4 cuts from each side, upto the middle row of the adjacent sides.
Log in to reply
Once you cut the cube, 4 cuts from the top, you don't have to do the same thing from the bottom too coz they are just the same right???
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Consider the center small cube. (i.e. If the large cube was 3×3 then I am referring to the 1×1 cube that had no exposed faces)
We can divide the 3×3 cube using planes (with each plane corresponding to one cut). If any face of the small 1×1 cube did not lie on a plane, then the the cube would not have been cut out. (i.e. it would not be exposed). To put it simply, each face requires one cut.
Hence at least 6 planes are needed hence 6 cuts. It is achievable: 2 cuts from the top, 2 cuts from the front and 2 cuts from the sides along the black lines.